Ann Coulter: IF NOT ROMNEY, WHO? IF NOT NOW, WHEN? (No Ann NOT Rommey!)

AnnCoulter.Com ^ | November 16, 2011 | Ann Coulter

[Syncro]

IF NOT ROMNEY, WHO? IF NOT NOW, WHEN?

November 16, 2011

So now, apparently, we have to go through the cycle of the media pushing Newt Gingrich. This is going to be fantastic.

In addition to having an affair in the middle of Clinton's impeachment; apologizing to Jesse Jackson on behalf of J.C. Watts -- one of two black Republicans then in Congress –- for having criticized "poverty pimps," and then inviting Jackson to a State of the Union address; cutting a global warming commercial with Nancy Pelosi; supporting George Soros' candidate Dede Scozzafava in a congressional special election; appearing in public with the Rev. Al Sharpton to promote nonspecific education reform; and calling Paul Ryan's plan to save Social Security "right-wing social engineering," we found out this week that Gingrich was a recipient of Freddie Mac political money.

(Even I will admit, however, that Newt was great when he was chairman of GOPAC back in the '90s with Gay Gaines at the helm.)

Although Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- the institutions most responsible for the nation's current financial crisis -- were almost entirely Democratic cash cows, they managed to dirty up enough Republicans to make it seem like bipartisan corruption.

Democrats sucked hundreds of millions of dollars out of these institutions: Franklin Raines, $90 million; Jamie Gorelick, $26.4 million; Jim Johnson, $20 million.

By contrast, Republicans came cheap. For the amazingly good price of only $300,000 apiece, Fannie and Freddie bought the good will of former Reps. Vin Weber, R-Minn., Susan Molinari, R-N.Y., and Newt Gingrich, R-Ga.* Former Sen. Alfonse D'Amato, R-N.Y., was even cheaper at $240,000.

[*Correction: After Gingrich admitted last week to receiving $300,000 from Freddie, we found out this week that it was actually closer to $1.6 million.]

So now conservatives shy away from denouncing these crooked organizations for fear of running into Vin Weber at a cocktail party.

Sorry, guys -- on the plus side, you're millionaires, but on the downside, you've earned the contempt of your fellow man.

The mainstream media keep pushing alternatives to Mitt Romney not only because they are terrified of running against him, but also because they want to keep Republicans fighting, allowing Democrats to get a four-month jump on us.

Meanwhile, everyone knows the nominee is going to be Romney.

That's not so bad if you think the most important issues in this election are defeating Obama and repealing Obamacare.

Read More »

[Valin]

Moot point, Obama will crush Romney.

Or not.
If unemployment stays in the high 8% low 9% The One is going to have a very hard time winning.

[Clintonfatigued]

Ann Coulter is not actually endorsing Romney in this article. Here’s an excerpt: “There may be better ways to stop Obamacare than Romney, but, unfortunately, they’re not available right now.” If that’s support, it’s tepid, and I’ve never known Ann Coulter to be tepid about anything in the past.

[Syncro]

Very good observation, thanks!

[Syncro]

The Supreme Court argument is one of many reasons [to vote for Romney]

Romney has a track record of appointing leftist and democrat judges over conservatives and Tea Party types.

[Clintonfatigued]

You’re welcome. Romney critics are calling this a near-endorsement. I’m no Romney supporter and in fact he’s my least favorite Republican candidate. More than anything else, this sounds like a call to party untiy.

[Syncro]

Yes, your last statement

Coulter is quite the consummate GOPer.

[JulieRNR21]

Okay.....her support might be tepid but I can’t understand how she can even tepidly support such a flip-flopper RINO like Romney.....that said, I really don’t care what she thinks.

[Impy]

She’s a bit of a flake.