Skip to comments.Penn Police: McQueary Never Told Us Jack [Sandusky]
Posted on 11/16/2011 5:14:30 PM PST by BunnySlippers
Mike McQueary never once went to the Penn State campus police OR the State College PD after witnessing Jerry Sandusky allegedly rape a 10-year-old boy in 2002 -- this according to reps for both departments.
According to CBS, neither police bureau has any record of being contacted by Mike McQueary -- despite recent claims McQueary made in an email ... "I did have discussions with police and with the official at the university in charge of police."
(Excerpt) Read more at tmz.com ...
Not a Happy Valley, now.
Yeah. And if he did and the cops did nothing, the cops would be equally culpable. Nobody can be believed here.
But hey, let’s pay attention because it will create jobs, won’t it?
Strictly a distraction for anyone other than the participants.
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
Nothing “on the record,” they mean.
They probably called Joe Pa for guidance on that.
I’m a firm believer that people can walk and chew gum at the same time.
I am interested in job creation AND PEDOPHELIA at the same time.
Just for the record, In your headline it’s Penn State Police not Penn Police
Maybe a correction by the Mods is in order?
The cops are in on the coverup.
I can’t speak for McQueary or Paterno or the others ... but if I went to the police and said I walked into the gym and hear the “slap-slap” of sexual activity and saw Sandusky abusing the boy ... then I waited weeks, months and years with nothing happening, I would take it higher.
I totally agree.
If the D.A. was working on the case back in the 90’s and ended up missing in action, don’t you think that the police were somehow and sometime during that period called in to investigate the case? Wouldn’t they be brought into working the case at the same time the D.A. was actively involveda? Don’t you think the Board of Trustees for Penn State when this D.A. was working on the case, would be notified that there is a potential child molester working in the Atlectic Dept? Also wouldn’t you think that at that time Sandusky’s name would be on the police’s radar. Why wasn’t he being carefully watched at that time?
Whoever ends up in charge of this investigation sure has their work cut out for them. Don’t know if anybody can be believed.
These are not exactly public thoroughfares but there are presumably athletes going in and out of the showers from practice sessions all day long!
So why did this guy think he could get away with the practice?
One conclusion is everybody else he encountered was of the same inclination.
At least for the attack witnessed by McQueary, it was long after anyone would normally have been around: 9:30 PM. The locker room was dark, and McQueary noticed the lights on in the showers, which was unusual.
As I look across the room at my 10 year old son, I guarantee that we’d be talking about Sandusky in past tense and I would be proud to accept the legal rammifications.
I’m suprised a father hasn’t already shot him with buckshot right between the legs and left to bleed out in agony.
The OP used the actual headline from the source (misleading as it is), which is in accordance with the FR rules.