Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mike McQueary's statement to police doesn't say he stopped attack or notified ...
http://mobile.pennlive.com/advpenn/pm_29239/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=qP7Mq6rO ^

Posted on 11/16/2011 6:31:07 PM PST by TigerClaws

Penn State assistant football coach Mike McQueary never mentioned that he talked to police in 2002 after witnessing an alleged sexual assault by Jerry Sandusky of a young boy, according to a hand-written statement McQueary gave to police during the recent grand jury investigation.

(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.pennlive.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: pedstate; pennstate; psu; sourcetitlenoturl

1 posted on 11/16/2011 6:31:10 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Help Free Republic Avoid
A Conservative "Time Out"!!
Your Donations Help To Keep
FR In The Fight!!
For Quarterly Or Monthly Donations
Click Here!!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


2 posted on 11/16/2011 6:33:11 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
In [his statement to the grand jury], McQueary states that he witnessed a boy, about 10, being sodomized in a shower and hurried out of the locker room.

So much for the brief attempt to try to obscure or excuse this coward's behavior. The account stands as it was originally reported: a burly, 28 year old adult man saw another adult man rape a 10 year old boy and ran away to daddy rather than stopping it or calling the police. He remains scum.

3 posted on 11/16/2011 6:35:05 PM PST by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard
burly, 28 year old adult man saw another adult man rape a 10 year old boy

An naked adult man in his late 60's. It would have been the easiest take down of McQueary's life if he had attempted it.

4 posted on 11/16/2011 6:54:29 PM PST by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

Not only that to save face he’s created a serious credibility gap which may harm the prosecution’s case.


5 posted on 11/16/2011 7:15:20 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK
Sandusky would have been in his late 50s at the time of the attack witnessed by McQueary. McQ now claims he "made sure the attack was ended," which might mean that S. stopped the sex when he realized there was a witness. Sandusky's lawyer claims they have contacted the victim, who swears nothing sexual happened. How is S able to locate the victim, while the prosecutors say they haven't found him? Makes me wonder if S. has continued to have a relationship with the boy over the intervening years. If S. is correct, McQ's testimony is critical.

The trial is going to be amazing, what with all the conflicting stories.

6 posted on 11/16/2011 7:15:33 PM PST by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

That may be the intention here, to muddy the waters just enough....the prosecution has their work cut out for them.


7 posted on 11/16/2011 7:16:49 PM PST by dfwgator (I stand with Herman Cain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

He’s a key witness and he’s discredited himself with his lying.

Sandusky’s lawyer will drive a tractor trailer truck though this pitiful excuse for a man. Obviously the liar did not realize his e-mail would go beyond his addressee pals. It’s time to stop lying now, McQueary.


8 posted on 11/16/2011 7:31:14 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hellbender

I think Sandusky is lying about contacting the victim.


9 posted on 11/16/2011 7:47:49 PM PST by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

How did the Grand Jury know to question McQueary? How did investigators find out about the 2002 incident?


10 posted on 11/16/2011 7:50:38 PM PST by mom.mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: musicman

McQueary failed to man-up and rescue the boy from the debasement he was suffering at the hands of Sandusky. He wanted to be promoted from graduate assistant to assistant coach so bad that he felt compelled to consult his dad about how to handle what he had witnessed. He didn’t want to rock the boat.

He should have gone into the shower, taken the boy by the arm and led him to safety and security. He should have looked Sandusky in the eye and suggested that he go home and blow his brains out and save the state a lot of money and his victims a lot of shame and humiliation because he was about to take the boy to the police and then to the hospital for a medical exam.

This is what a man would have done. McQueary was no man then and he still isn’t. He is lying to his friends and trying to cover his own failures.

He is guilty of gross negligence and infinite cowardice.


11 posted on 11/16/2011 8:01:50 PM PST by Saltmeat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson