Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich made big bucks pushing corporate welfare (BIG PHARMA)
Washington Examiner ^ | 11/16/11 | Tom Carney

Posted on 11/16/2011 6:54:03 PM PST by Fred

Newt Gingrich spent the last decade being paid by big business to convince conservatives to support big-government policies that would profit his clients.

Gingrich's consulting firm racked up $1.6 million in fees from the government-sponsored enterprise Freddie Mac, we learned this week from Bloomberg News. Gingrich's job was to help Freddie Mac win over conservatives to this market-distorting, bubble-fueling, housing-subsidy entity, which is now officially owned by the federal government.

We also know that Growth Energy, an ethanol lobby, paid $312,500 to the Gingrich Group in 2009, according to the group's tax filing. Growth Energy lobbies to preserve many ethanol subsidies and create new ones. Gingrich has consistently supported ethanol subsidies, despite his professed allegiance to the free market.

But there may be much more to Gingrich's advocacy work than has been reported so far. For instance, a former employee of the nation's biggest drug lobby told me Gingrich was being paid by the drug industry during the 2003 debate over the Medicare prescription drug benefit.

(Excerpt) Read more at campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cronycapitalist; ethanol; ethanolsubsidies; fannie; freddie; gingrich; gingrichgroup; growthenergy; growthenergym; pharma; porkbarrel; subsidies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: Farmer Dean

It would sure as hell sit well with me if I could do it!!!


21 posted on 11/16/2011 7:34:07 PM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Fred

So, Gingrich was running a PRIVATE business that hired out to increase other private companies’ chances with the government. Therefore, that means he believed in the goals of the companies he contracted with.

That’s like saying that the Jeffrey Dahmer’s lawyer had to believe like Dahmer did.

Lawyers defend people because that’s their business.
Advocacy companies advocate for other companies because that’s their business.

It’s called: FREE ENTERPRISE.


22 posted on 11/16/2011 7:46:47 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred

Like so many who left high government positions, Newt hung around to cash in on his connections and influence. It just that most don’t cash in and then turn around and run for president.

Probably more to come before this chapter is written.


23 posted on 11/16/2011 7:49:15 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: Farmer Dean; Fred
That Newt can make as much money in one insider lobbying deal as most people will make in a lifetime doesn’t sit well with a lot of folks out here.

Is it the amount he was paid? Or was it that as a former Speaker of the House he would have access to legislators?

Once Newt was out of office was he supposed to just go back to GA and retire?

Newt is not my first choice. I don't see anything illegal in him being paid well to represent clients in talking with people who can directly affect their livelihoods. For example, if I'm being prosecuted for a crime and I have the choice of a fresh out of school public defender, or a top notch former prosecutor to represent me I want the former prosecutor.

If we don't want lobbying then push for a flat tax, or national sales tax instead of the tax code we have today.

25 posted on 11/16/2011 8:00:42 PM PST by wmfights (PERRY 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Fred

I can not support this guy. I did like him as Speaker back in the day, but I turned out disappointed. Let him work at a think tank or something.


26 posted on 11/16/2011 8:00:45 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The “Cain Train” continues.........trying to smear every candidate who is not him.

Cain backers mistakenly think his support wanes because of the media. Let me tell ya, folks:

Nobody likes the little brother who roots against all of his older brothers in order to pump himself up. That’s why his numbers have dropped.

I have no use for the “everyone is scum but Herman Cain” crowd and their daily attempts to push liberal smears against accomplished Republicans in the race. Every day for months it has been the same crap. You’re fast running out of people to alienate.

P.S. I’m not supporting your third party push for Herman Cain when the tantrum hits DefCon 5.


27 posted on 11/16/2011 8:06:32 PM PST by TitansAFC (Stop the caINSANITY, The Pizza guy is less qualified than Obama!!! No New taxes!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins; Fred
Advocacy companies advocate for other companies because that’s their business.

It's a great point! As long as he was not doing anything illegal (giving bribes) why shouldn't he make a living.

28 posted on 11/16/2011 8:07:11 PM PST by wmfights (PERRY 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: wmfights; Farmer Dean; Fred

Apparently, Gingrich made about one and a half million bucks over 8 years as a contract consultant with Freddie Mac. Nobody forced Freddie to contract with him.

It was a private business. He was no longer in government. It is roughly 200 grand a year. He makes fairly big bucks.

Some freepers are starting to sound like they believe in Obama’s class envy. They hate, not just the rich, but the upper middle class, too. They hate people who make more money than they do.


29 posted on 11/16/2011 8:12:06 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Nobody likes the little brother who roots against all of his older brothers in order to pump himself up. That’s why his numbers have dropped.

Great point. I think his decline is caused by that as well as his ignorance of the issues. Newt to his credit has been the opposite. Newt has been supportive of all candidates and does have a good command of the issues.

30 posted on 11/16/2011 8:15:01 PM PST by wmfights (PERRY 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: xzins

The problem is that there is more to Newts record than just these things. He is a sitting duck. and, no matter how much you or any of us want to say “Oh, this was a private business” I guarantee the Left will go gangbusters about these things.


31 posted on 11/16/2011 8:15:56 PM PST by chilepup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: xzins; Farmer Dean; Fred
Some freepers are starting to sound like they believe in Obama’s class envy. They hate, not just the rich, but the upper middle class, too. They hate people who make more money than they do.

My refrain is always the same, "as long as it was made honestly I don't care".

We should look at this from the perspective of our own lives. What ever it is we do for a living there are things that accrue to our benefit over time and people do business with us because of them. For example, I sold real estate for a long time and I often picked up listings because I worked with a large number of European immigrants and sellers knew this was the market most likely to buy their property. If sellers gravitated to me because of this advantage and I made a lot of money because of it was this somehow evil? NO!

If Newt made a bunch money because he had been in govt for 20 years and was a former Speaker of the House what do I care as long as he did it honestly.

I think where Newt does run into trouble is the times he lined up with the foes of conservatives rather than fighting with conservatives.

32 posted on 11/16/2011 8:31:47 PM PST by wmfights (PERRY 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Fred

And this surprises — WHO!?


33 posted on 11/16/2011 9:17:48 PM PST by patriot preacher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred
The drug industry hires well connected people to lobby Washington DC to support their interests? Say it ain't so!! Next thing you'll be telling us is there's politics going on in DC. It's a damned travesty, I tell ya.

It costs hundreds of millions of dollars and more tan 10 years to bring a new drug to market. More than 90% of all compounds never make it out of clinical trials. Looks like "BIG PHARMA" (it is such a joke for anyone to use that term then pretend to support capitalism) needs to find some better connected lobbyist because they sure aren't getting much bang for their buck from the current crop.

Thanks for your time. Now back to your circular firing squad that will ensure we get four more years of hope and change.

34 posted on 11/16/2011 9:20:30 PM PST by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

What’s even more notable is that there’s no allegation - so far as I can tell - of him doing anythin illegal or unethical. This stuff came from his filings, right?

So what’s the issue?

Hank


35 posted on 11/16/2011 9:35:06 PM PST by County Agent Hank Kimball (Screw it. Newt's the smartest candidate and the guy I want to see debating Obummer. Flame away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Bravo TitansAFC!!! well said


36 posted on 11/16/2011 9:40:17 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Fred
First Michele

Then Perry

Then Cain

Then Newt

All according to plan BWAHHAHAHAHAHAH

37 posted on 11/16/2011 10:00:46 PM PST by Tribune7 (If you demand perfection you will wind up with leftist Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Cain is writing these Newt “vetting” articles? Or are you just having a hissy now that’s it time for your guy in the meat grinder lol


38 posted on 11/16/2011 10:44:23 PM PST by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I am most definitely NOT in favor of class envy.I DO not like influence peddling.
39 posted on 11/17/2011 4:26:09 AM PST by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

“Influence peddling” is indistinguishable from “Expert Consultant”.

So, if I hire a defense attorney who used to work in the District Attorney’s office, then that is unethical...right?

That man has no business being a defense attorney.


40 posted on 11/17/2011 4:59:05 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson