Skip to comments.
Gingrich cashed in supporting subsidies for big businessRead more:
Daily Caller ^
| November 17, 2011
| Will Rahn
Posted on 11/17/2011 1:34:10 PM PST by Fred
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-147 last
To: fightinJAG
Did he so something wrong? I am not (again) a Gingrich supporter. Who are we left with? Cain has been attacked because the left is afraid of him, I'll vote for him in primary, they trashed Palin. I've had it too old to worry, mile mark 70 in a year.
141
posted on
11/17/2011 7:40:26 PM PST
by
boomop1
To: Las Vegas Ron
Go read my posting history, I have no interest in further conversation with you. In other words, you're running away from the truth, like a lot of other folks around here who're infatuated with RINO Newt.
To: Las Vegas Ron
Dream on my friend, dream on.
To: Timber Rattler
That's why I told you to go read my history moron. You'll see I haven't made a choice, I am just tired of the same old posters bashing candidate to build up their own.
Especially n00bs!
144
posted on
11/18/2011 6:54:06 AM PST
by
Las Vegas Ron
(Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
To: swampfox101
Care to place a little wager for a donation to FR?
145
posted on
11/18/2011 6:55:30 AM PST
by
Las Vegas Ron
(Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
To: fightinJAG
Yes, Newt would be a perfect candidate for the Dems. Because they can label him as an extreme conservative in order to stir up the middle and the left, while letting all of his numerous RINO activities come out to discourage the conservatives.
And they don’t even need to invent sex scandals. There are plenty of them—enough to make many of Southern Evangelicals stay home and refrain from voting. Especially if they are also reminded of Newt’s support for “a woman’s right to choose,” i.e., abortion.
Newt is probably the weakest candidate out there.
146
posted on
11/18/2011 8:58:20 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius.2)
To: Cicero
As I said, it would be like the Dems nominating Nancy Pelosi as their candidate 20 years from now and expecting Repubs/Tea Party to not remember what she was like during the Obama administration.
In this case, the Dems may be banking on the fact that their voters who were there during the Clinton administration will still be highly, highly anti-Gingrich.
And, yes, there is a lot of REAL stuff to deal with. Is it insurmountable? No. We could plow through, I expect. But acting as though it doesn't exist so long as it's not posted on FR is not a method.
(While reviewing Newt's record, remember these, one recent, one from 1994? Gingrich's Libya answer (compared to Cain's?) and that cringeworthy little sex kitten thing. A veritable walk down Memory Lane! Ugh.)
147
posted on
11/18/2011 9:56:03 AM PST
by
fightinJAG
(NO REPRESENTATION WITHOUT TAXATION! Everyone should pay taxes, everyone should pay the same rate.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-147 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson