Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The UN wants your guns
BIZPACReview.com ^ | 11/18/2011 | Michael Dorstewitz

Posted on 11/18/2011 7:25:22 AM PST by SmileRight

Six months ago, I posted a blog here called, “Gunfight at the Credo Corral.” In it, I described our Second Amendment right to bear arms as both fundamental and inalienable, meaning that the government is powerless to take that right away from us, and we can’t even give it away.

Of course, this has never stood in the way of a determined government. After all, a right possessed by the individual is a power denied to the state. Therefore, we must jealously guard our rights from attack by the very people we hire to protect them -- our politicians.

For example, some U.S. senators view gun control as an excuse to combat terrorism. It’s even been suggested that Operation Fast and Furious, which was engineered by our own government, will itself provide an excuse for gun control. Four months ago, the National Rifle Association warned its members that the Obama administration is planning to propose new gun control legislation.

But while our attention has been focused on our own lawmakers, a gang outside our borders is preparing to do battle with our Second Amendment rights. The name of that gang is ...

(Excerpt) Read more at bizpacreview.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; bloodoftyrants; clinton; communism; corruption; cwii; deadunwalking; democrats; donttreadonme; guncontrol; guns; liberalfascism; libertyordeath; lping; obama; secondamendment; shallnotbeinfringed; socailistdemocrats; tyranny; un; undertheradar; unitednations; unsmallarmstreaty; waronliberty; willnotbeinfringed; youwillnotdisarmus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-75 next last
This reminds us we need to stay vigilent about our Second Amendment rights. There are many out there who are quietly fighting to take it away.
1 posted on 11/18/2011 7:25:24 AM PST by SmileRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmileRight
"After all, a right possessed by the individual is a power denied to the state."

Great line! Me likey. I'm gonna save that one for future use.

2 posted on 11/18/2011 7:38:44 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight
They can try, but it will only get a bunch of them killed.

We will not comply.

III%


3 posted on 11/18/2011 7:41:23 AM PST by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight

Just heard a guy on the radio about the nationwide concealed carry thing. He said, basically, that since you don’t have to get a drivers license in every state to drive across country because your license for one state makes you good to go in others, the same should be true for concealed carry.

I just moved to Kentucky. I have to be a resident for six months before I can get a cc permit. I’m basically defenseless for six months.


4 posted on 11/18/2011 7:45:40 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight

Molon Labe


5 posted on 11/18/2011 7:47:53 AM PST by wordsofearnest (Proper aim of giving is to put the recipient in a state where he no longer needs it. C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight

They can have my bullets.


6 posted on 11/18/2011 7:48:13 AM PST by dfwgator (I stand with Herman Cain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight
Click on image to download PDF file of poster.

7 posted on 11/18/2011 7:50:17 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The enemy of my enemy is my candidate.<sup>®</sup>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

The problem is, it won’t be “blue helmets” coming to enforce the law,

but it will be expected that law enforcement at all levels enforce this law, including the cop down the street.

America is bound to abide by treaties it signs,
unless folks think we shouldn’t... ?


8 posted on 11/18/2011 7:52:13 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Correction : “ They can have my (Discharged ) bullets ,... one at a time .”

THere , I fixed it !


9 posted on 11/18/2011 7:53:26 AM PST by Tilted Irish Kilt ( (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11) by GlockThe Vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt

I figured that was assumed.


10 posted on 11/18/2011 7:54:16 AM PST by dfwgator (I stand with Herman Cain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight

Molon Labe


11 posted on 11/18/2011 7:56:17 AM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
My statement stands. Regardless of who they send.

Treaties made under the Constitutional authority given to the FedGov cannot exceed the limits placed on government by the Constitution itself.

Unless you think those treaties should exceed that authority...

12 posted on 11/18/2011 7:56:42 AM PST by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight
The UN wants your guns

"Ok, sure UN, go down that alley to where dead ends and turn into that warehouse, that's where I keep them"

UN walks into warehouse.

NS comes up from behind, knocks down the UN, takes UN wallet, points and laughs then runs off to buy some more guns

13 posted on 11/18/2011 7:58:34 AM PST by NativeSon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt

Right! They can have the projectiles but the cartridge cases and spent primers stay with me!


14 posted on 11/18/2011 8:01:50 AM PST by 2nd Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I have never seen this poster. Thanks for sharing.


15 posted on 11/18/2011 8:04:54 AM PST by T.O.K.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight
UN... if you dare...

Come and try to take them. See how far ya get.

"far" = "dead in your tracks"

16 posted on 11/18/2011 8:07:00 AM PST by ScottinVA (I miss America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight

17 posted on 11/18/2011 8:07:02 AM PST by Daffynition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

I don’t, and it’s up to the Senate to verify that any treaties they ratify do not violate the Constitution.


18 posted on 11/18/2011 8:07:38 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MrB
The problem is, it won’t be “blue helmets” coming to enforce the law, but it will be expected that law enforcement at all levels enforce this law, including the cop down the street.

Anyone siding with a foreign power to deny rights protected by our Constitution has declared his treasonous intent. Those who willingly or in ignorance sign on for such duty will need to be reminded that treason comes with a price.


19 posted on 11/18/2011 8:07:48 AM PST by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: T.O.K.

I created it over ten years ago.


20 posted on 11/18/2011 8:08:36 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The enemy of my enemy is my candidate.<sup>®</sup>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

21 posted on 11/18/2011 8:10:08 AM PST by Daffynition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MrB

No treaty which would negate any aspect of the Constitution should be signed, nor ratified, nor enforced.


22 posted on 11/18/2011 8:10:12 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nonsporting

I understand all that...

We have the same problem with the “UN Rights of the Child Treaty”...


23 posted on 11/18/2011 8:14:12 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight

24 posted on 11/18/2011 8:16:47 AM PST by magslinger (Who cares if they are"electable" if they are going to govern like Democrats? -noprogs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
I understand all that... We have the same problem with the “UN Rights of the Child Treaty”...

I decided in the early 90's that the UN coming after my children will terminate "playing nice." When they come for our "nasty toys" that pretty much says what they intend subsequently.

Maybe Europe will fold, but not the small percentage of freedom loving Americans. (3%? -- that will be enough).

25 posted on 11/18/2011 8:21:26 AM PST by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight
Photobucket
26 posted on 11/18/2011 8:28:22 AM PST by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition
I feel like going out there with a block & plasma cutter/welder and making that thing (link for the the bandwidth challenged) into a snubbie...

Is that a thoughtcrime? Or intent to commit intellectual property infringement? Hmm, two birds in one throw!

27 posted on 11/18/2011 8:28:34 AM PST by no-s (B.L.O.A.T. and every day...because some day soon they won't be making any more...for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nonsporting

I’ve put it this way...

When any entity seeks to remove your ability to resist the use of force against you,
they intend to use force against you.


28 posted on 11/18/2011 8:28:56 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


29 posted on 11/18/2011 8:32:01 AM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MrB

Oh... Well that makes me feel better. :-|


30 posted on 11/18/2011 8:36:36 AM PST by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MrB

I’ve put it this way...

When any entity seeks to remove your ability to resist the use of force against you,
they intend to use force against you.


A good use of common sense. To bad common sense ain’t very common.


31 posted on 11/18/2011 9:22:29 AM PST by The Working Man (The mantra for BO's reign...."No Child Left a Dime")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NativeSon

NS should have put a round in UN’s head then take the wallet.Use a supressor also .


32 posted on 11/18/2011 9:30:39 AM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight

Come and get them.


33 posted on 11/18/2011 9:57:10 AM PST by Jacvin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt

YES! If they demand your firearms, give them to them....but give them all your ammo FIRST! LOL.


34 posted on 11/18/2011 10:29:54 AM PST by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: no-s

Be my guest...LOL

Jes tell ‘em you’re from the OWS-gang....you’ll be fine. :)


35 posted on 11/18/2011 10:36:26 AM PST by Daffynition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Agree....


36 posted on 11/18/2011 10:37:36 AM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Renegade

but only after pointing a laughing


37 posted on 11/18/2011 10:40:31 AM PST by NativeSon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Renegade

but only after pointing and laughing


38 posted on 11/18/2011 10:40:51 AM PST by NativeSon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight

The UN wants my gun? Fine, just send a “Blue Hat” over to my house and I’ll let him have it.


39 posted on 11/18/2011 10:51:11 AM PST by HenpeckedCon (What pi$$es me off the most is that POS commie will get a State Funeral!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Hey Corpse...

They can have mine... Ammo first.

III% - Stand up now, or crawl later.

Hope you’re well, brother.


40 posted on 11/18/2011 10:51:17 AM PST by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition; All

That artwork is a direct assault on the Constitution of the United States. It is an abomination.


41 posted on 11/18/2011 10:51:42 AM PST by marktwain (In an age of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MrB

“...they intend to use force against you...”

Which automatically de-legitimizes them, provides an immediate threat vector AND a target, and removes any reason whatsoever why any AMERICAN should entertain any notion of compliance.

F*** ‘em.

“Resist We Much” as Reverend Al Sharpton said...(had to do it...I couldn’t help myself).

We’re Americans, this ain’t Europe, and we will NOT comply.

Molon labe.


42 posted on 11/18/2011 10:56:01 AM PST by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MrB

“...but it will be expected that law enforcement at all levels enforce this law, including the cop down the street...”

Then you already know where he lives.

The words “Choose this day whom you will serve...” come to mind. If Officer Friendly makes his choice against you, his own people, well...he makes his own bed then.

“...America is bound to abide by treaties it signs,
unless folks think we shouldn’t... “

Not when it comes to abrogating my rights as an AMERICAN Citizen. I don’t give a rat’s ass what some Bulgarian or Ghanian puke thinks about my right to own a firearm...nor do I care what Banki Moon, or Kofi Anon or whatever other totally replaceable, completely interchangeable Marxist douchebag du jour is running the show over there thinks.

And any one of OUR politicians who signs us on to ANY treaty that infringes on our rights should be immediately arrested, and publically hanged as a traitor.

We have people that swore an oath to uphold, protect, and defend the US Constitution against enemies foreign and domestic.

This is an example of BOTH types of enemies, right here amongst us.

Pretty much sums it up for me.


43 posted on 11/18/2011 11:05:12 AM PST by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MrB
No treaty can take away a right, the treaty itself would be unconstitional and therefore illegal.

Only a constitutional amendment can remove a right.

44 posted on 11/18/2011 11:11:32 AM PST by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MrB
America is bound to abide by treaties it signs, unless folks think we shouldn’t... ?

Just as a law which presumes powers not granted to the government by the Constitution is invalid, so is a treaty that exceeds their authority. They can't give away in your stead something of yours they don't own.

45 posted on 11/18/2011 11:12:08 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ratman83
Only a constitutional amendment can remove a right.

Wrong. Your rights do not exist because someone wrote them on a scrap of parchment.

46 posted on 11/18/2011 11:15:03 AM PST by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]




Click the Pic               Thank you, JoeProBono

Gary, Dropped Off by His Friend, Wends His Way Home

Follow the Exciting Adventures of Gary the Snail!


Donate Monthly
Sponsors will pony up a sawbuck
For each New Monthly Donor

47 posted on 11/18/2011 11:37:52 AM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lurker
I did not say they existed because of the constitution. But it is the only thing protecting our rights.

The government is constantly trying and in some cases succeeding in eroding away our rights.

48 posted on 11/18/2011 11:42:32 AM PST by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

OC is pre-emption legal in the commonwealth of ky...on the person or in a vehichle, which includes the glove box...


49 posted on 11/18/2011 11:50:21 AM PST by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gilbo_3

What does that mean, exactly?


50 posted on 11/18/2011 11:52:26 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson