Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leading senators: Kagan may have to recuse herself from health case
The Washington Times ^ | November 18, 2011 | Stephen Dinan

Posted on 11/18/2011 4:30:01 PM PST by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 11/18/2011 4:30:04 PM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

She should absolutely not be sitting on this case. She’s 100% conflicted.


2 posted on 11/18/2011 4:32:56 PM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle

Your right. but..

She will.


3 posted on 11/18/2011 4:33:41 PM PST by cableguymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle

“She should absolutely not be sitting on this case. She’s 100% conflicted.”

She ain’t conflicted at all...that’s the problem.


4 posted on 11/18/2011 4:34:33 PM PST by jessduntno ("They say the world has become too complex for simple answers... they are wrong." - RR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

May? She should not be sitting on the court when this is heard.


5 posted on 11/18/2011 4:34:54 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle

She’s not conflicted at all. One needs a conscience for that. She is a democrat. They have seared their conscience long ago.


6 posted on 11/18/2011 4:35:53 PM PST by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Yeah, we’ll wait for that to happen.


7 posted on 11/18/2011 4:36:02 PM PST by sixgunjer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Recusal is the prerogative of the individual justices. She will never step away from this one. They know the furor will be temporary and the media will give her a pass.


8 posted on 11/18/2011 4:36:06 PM PST by Baynative (The penalty for not participating in politics is you will be governed by your inferiors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle

Agreed and I’ll go one step further, she’s an activist judge that shouldn’t be on the SCOTUS bench.


9 posted on 11/18/2011 4:36:10 PM PST by jazusamo (The real minimum wage is zero: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Obama knew the conflict when he nominated her. If he says he did so expecting her to recuse herself then she should recuse herself. If Obama says he did not expect her to recuse herself for such an obvious conflict of interest then Obama should be impeached.


10 posted on 11/18/2011 4:36:44 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

I agree, she’ll never recuse herself.


11 posted on 11/18/2011 4:37:39 PM PST by jazusamo (The real minimum wage is zero: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The decision to recuse is up to the judge himself/herself and I would be highly surprised if she did that on this case. After all, the reason Obama put her on the court was to rubber stamp his policies.


12 posted on 11/18/2011 4:38:32 PM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Her voting for Obamacare is the very reason that she was nominated for the court in the first place.
13 posted on 11/18/2011 4:38:59 PM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

You’re dead on the money. This is but one thing Obama should be impeached for though.


14 posted on 11/18/2011 4:40:11 PM PST by jazusamo (The real minimum wage is zero: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
Because of two characteristics Barry bassturd has, he is unimpeachable. There is not any behavior he could commit which would result in impeachment and removal. None.
15 posted on 11/18/2011 4:40:32 PM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

She can be impeached and put up for trial in the senate and then removed from office. A conflict of interest would be an impeachable offense. Would boner and. Cantor do it, hell no.


16 posted on 11/18/2011 4:42:01 PM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Perry and his fellow demorats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It won’t matter. The remaining 3 liberals will vote to uphold, the 4 conservatives will vote to strike down, Kennedy will be the swing vote. If it is 4-4 the law stands.


17 posted on 11/18/2011 4:42:24 PM PST by FewsOrange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FewsOrange
I actually think the notion that the commerce clause applies to your body won't sit well with Kennedy. I say it gets struck down 5-4.
18 posted on 11/18/2011 4:49:13 PM PST by jpf (phillies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
"Kagan Directs Staff to “Be Involved” in Crafting Defense of Obamacare; Scolds Justice Colleague on the Issue of Her Participation: “This Needs to be Coordinated…You Should not Say Anything about This before Talking to Me.”

http://www.judicialwatch.org/news/2011/may/documents-raise-questions-about-supreme-court-justice-kagan-s-role-obamacare-defense-s

19 posted on 11/18/2011 4:56:54 PM PST by Qbert ("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Thanks for linking. This shows she was darn well in it.


20 posted on 11/18/2011 5:00:19 PM PST by jazusamo (The real minimum wage is zero: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson