Skip to comments.New Hampshire board decides Obama eligibility
Posted on 11/18/2011 5:59:48 PM PST by Elderberry
A state board in New Hampshire has decided that Barack Obama's name is good to go on the state's 2012 presidential ballot because the application was filled out properly and the $1,000 fee was paid, according to an attorney who challenged his candidacy because of suspicions of fraud.
The determination came today from the state's Ballot Law Commission, which heard arguments from attorney Orly Taitz, who had filed a complaint about Obama's candidacy that was joined by several state lawmakers.
Jerome Corsi's New York Times best-seller, "Where's the Birth Certificate?", which addresses Obama's Social Security Number, is now available for immediate shipping, autographed by the author, only from the WND Superstore
A spokesman at the commission's office today told WND that the members had "broken up" their meeting and left immediately, leaving no information about any decisions they made.
But Taitz told WND in a telephone interview that she was unable to get the board to remove Obama from the ballot, despite the evidence she submitted of alleged fraud regarding his birth certificate. The evidence, she charged, indicates he does not meet the Constitution's requirement that the president be a "natural born citizen."
She also presented allegations and evidence concerning Obama's use of a Social Security number from Connecticut, even though he has no links to the state while growing up. The use of such a number has been cited by critics as evidence of fraudulent activities.
Read more: New Hampshire board decides Obama eligibility http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=369241#ixzz1e70NTw2S
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
How could we possibly ask for more?
Do you think they even scrutinize the application?
I bet they only make sure the $1,000 check was good.
This situation epitomizes modern Protestant Christians. The proof of zero’s ineligibilty is about as clear as you can make it but the modern Protestant can’t really fight back. We’ve been domesticated. This was the ultimate goal.
We go down, not swinging, but watching TV.
It was not supposed to be foolproof. It was due diligence. It was doing the necessary until such time as the corrupt can be brought to a justice too long deferred. Quitters never win, but losers win when they persevere long enough to ultimately win. George Washington lost all of the battles he commanded, except the few he won when he needed to win.
Or, pecking away on a computer keyboard.
Glad you’re setting the example, stud.
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
Who among us was shocked? After all the guy paid his $1,000 fee. What more do you need?
Thirty pieces of silver? The price of betrayal.
Thanks for the ping!
The counsel for the election commission claimed the commission’s, by statute only had the jurisdiction to uphold the law and then cited one law, which was that a presidential candidate had to fill out a form and pay the fee. He ignored that a separate statute requires the candidates to declare under penalty of perjury that he is Constitutionally eligible for office. Orly, evidently had NOT cited that statute and was not prepared to make them uphold that part of the law as should have been required. The good part, I guess, is that she has grounds to sue this commission and she has legal standing since her specific objection was not legally satisified by the commission.
All five members of the election commission turned out to be Democrats, according to Orly. I don’t know if that is true or not, but it sure sounds as though the fix was already in.
And it seems things became somewhat exciting post-hearing, per Orly Taitz:
“I gave them the case. I provided all the evidence that he is using a stolen social security number and forged birth certificate and provided all of the information in regard to Minor v. Happersett, Vattel, etc. I probably spoke for half an hour. Afterward, the assistant attorney general presented his case, which was a joke. A five-year-old could have made a better case. He brought the assistant secretary of state and asked, Well, did Obama fill out the paper? Yes. Did he pay the $1,000 fee? Yes. OK, heres my case. “
“So I did cross-examination, and I told her, Maam, I was born in the Soviet Union. If I were to lie, if I were to commit fraud and fill out a paper saying I am eligible for the presidency and paid you $1,000, would you put my name on the ballot? And she looked at me with her stupid eyes and said, Well, ah ummm well, ah, if there were a challenge, then I wouldnt. So I said, OK. So everything that you just said with the attorney general is pointless. If there is a challenge, then you cannot put the person on the ballot. So what do you do if there is a challenge? And I asked her, If you show the attorney general that Obama is using a stolen social security number and a forged birth certificate, what does he do? And she was looking at me with big cow eyes and said, IIIIIIIII dont know. And I said, What do you mean you dont know? What did he do? Did he say he will not put him on the ballot? Did he start an investigation? Or did he hide it, sweeping it all under the rug? and she had nothing to say. So he was saying, Well, he filled out the paper, and Biden came over and gave us a $1,000 check “
“So I stood up and told them, Ladies and gentlemen of the committee, you have all the evidence that the paperwork was filled out fraudulently. If you allow him on the ballot in the state of New Hampshire, you are aiding and abetting forgery, fraud and treason. You will be criminally complicit. “
“As they stepped out, everybody mobbed the secretary of state and attorney general. They were screaming at them. Ive never seen anything like this. Particularly women women were screaming, How could you do this to us?! How could you allow him on the ballot? Where is your decency? They were screaming. So the committee said, Heres our attorney. He has something to say. So the attorney said, Well, according to the law, the candidate is supposed to fill out a form and pay $1,000. Obama filled out the form and paid $1,000, so hes on the ballot. “
“Everybody jumped to their feet. They were screaming and yelling and saying, Traitors! Youre traitors! You have no decency! You have no honesty! Youre committing treason! It was huge. Cameras were rolling, and they had to call security. (Rep.) Harry Accornero started yelling at to the chair of the committee and the corrupt attorney, and the attorney, Brad E. Cook, said, Representative Accornero, you are out of order. And Accornero said, No, you are out of order; you are committing treason. You have to face the people of the state of New Hampshire, and you better not get out of the house without a mask! “
“Ive never seen anything like it. People were so mad that I thought, In another minute, theyre going to bring a rope and start hanging them all. Representative Carol Vita kept getting right in the face of the assistant attorney general; she was yelling and screaming at him.”
[William Gardner, SoS of New Hampshire, has been serving at that post since 1976.]
Oh yeah, the link:
After the republic is restored, there will be trials
Excellent post. Obama has to swear he is eligible to hold the office of POTUS, yet the application accepted was submitted by Biden.
Looks like challenges to Soebarkahâs qualifications are being filed all over the country. The Sheriff’s report is coming out in January. These committees just need to demand inspection of the Original documents in Hawaii. Not a big deal. I think the “Hampshire five” know that it’s a fraud.
‘Birther’ bid to derail Obama blocked
State Ballot Law Commission members called traitors
By Maddie Hanna / Monitor staff
November 19, 2011
As state election officials yesterday rejected California lawyer Orly Taitz’s argument to keep President Obama’s name off the New Hampshire presidential ballot, supporters lining the hearing room in the Legislative Office Building cried out in protest.
“Traitors!” shouted one woman. “Spineless traitors!”
“Saying a treasonous liar can go on our ballot?” yelled State Rep. Harry Accornero, a Republican from Laconia. “You’re going to have to face the citizens of Laconia. You better wear a mask.”
The spectacle before the state Ballot Law Commission began with a presentation by Taitz, who came to Concord yesterday afternoon to continue her years-long demand for proof of Obama’s U.S. citizenship.
Taitz, a dentist who was born in the Soviet Union, is running as a Republican for a seat in the California Senate and runs what she bills as the “world’s leading Obama eligibility challenge website,” refuses to accept the veracity of the birth certificates released by the White House in response to questions circulating through chain emails and on the internet about Obama’s birth.
The administration released Obama’s birth certificate from the state of Hawaii in 2008. When that didn’t satisfy the skeptics, it posted a long-form version online earlier this year.
But Taitz insists that document is fake: The computer file is layered and could have been altered with the Adobe Illustrator program, she said.
“A child can see this is a forgery,” she told the commission. “Why are they refusing to show the public the original?”
She also claims Obama doesn’t have a valid Social Security number. Included in the 85-page packet Taitz submitted to the commission is a tax return with “a number that was never assigned to him,” Taitz said. She said Obama is using a Social Security number issued in Connecticut around 1977.
In conducting her research, Taitz said she also found several birth dates associated with Obama in a national database. And she found information that she said contradicts Obama’s claim about the length of time he spent attending Columbia University, which claims the president as a 1983 graduate.
“We have an individual where we don’t know who he is,” Taitz said. “We need to know that the person who is at the helm of this country, who is leading our military, whose finger is on the red button of nuclear weapons, has proper identification.”
She told the commission members they would be responsible for “the most egregious election fraud ever committed” if they didn’t take Obama’s name off the ballot.
“This is bigger than Watergate. This is a hundred times bigger than Watergate,” Taitz said. “Ladies and gentlemen, in your hands is national security for the United States of America.”
But the commission wasn’t convinced.
“Is there any decision, any place, by any body - adjudicatory body - to the questions you’re asking?” said the chairman, Bradford Cook. “Because they’ve been asked a lot of places.”
“No, but -” Taitz began.
“No,” Cook said. “Thank you.”
He then addressed the several dozen other people in the room, a number of whom were videotaping the hearing: “Does anybody have factual evidence - not opinions, not rumors, not thoughts?”
“It’s the Constitution, sir,” said Dick Marple, a former state representative. “It states we must respect the law of nations.” He went on to say that the British Nationality Act makes Obama a British citizen, since Obama’s father was born in Kenya, which was still a British colony when Obama was born.
“What took place after that is not even germane to the issue,” Marple said. The commission heard from several others, including Accornero, the Laconia representative; Greg Goss, a self-described “natural-born citizen” from Hudson; and Erin Sullivan of Bradenton, Fla., who had been visiting a relative in Massachusetts and decided to come to Concord for yesterday’s hearing.
“I want to say, the Constitution is what makes America great,” Sullivan said, drawing applause from the room.
It was out of the commission’s purview, however. Senior Assistant Attorney General James Boffetti told commission members they could only consider whether Obama had filed his declaration of candidacy form in accordance with state law and paid his $1,000 filing fee. Both form and fee were properly submitted by Vice President Joe Biden on Oct. 20, according to Assistant Secretary of State Karen Ladd.
The five members voted unanimously to keep Obama’s name on the ballot.
Their response to the testimony during the hearing angered many of those in the room, including state representatives.
“Unbelievable,” fumed state Rep. Susan DeLemus, a Republican from Rochester, walking around the room during a break in the hearing, before the commission took its vote.
“Let’s just bury the Constitution now and have a funeral,” DeLemus said. “It just makes me want to throw up.”
Among several ridiculous things in article, the writer-a little typical 23-25 yr old scribling in a chair near the door- writes OT is a dentist but fails to mention she’s a lawyer- which one HAS to be and was so made very, very clear by the chairman in order to testify without giving oath! Amazing even such a young “reporter” can know when to drop out salient facts to fit the agenda narrative. Bet the editor gave her that tip.
Taitz had very compact and well-done presentation. She covered everything deftly except Selective Service application, citing it only in that zer0 used bogus SS# on it.
I left after initial presentation thinking there’d be a week or two delay before announcement of inevitable. Rep. Susan DeLemus, Rochester was sitting near me with a friend or two of hers and I asked in the general direction at the outset of the break if deliberations would be open and they were set on going toward Taitz and friends while I added too quietly if there’d be another meeting for later announcement and got no answer so they either didn’t know or hear me as to both qs. Im explaining why I left. I went off to pray BTW.
DeLumas then made her remark in regular voice while traversing from our left side of the room toward the right, where ‘the action’ was. She said it within easy hearing of our young female Monitor writer. This writer should clearly have added that Rep Accornero spoke to the various courts having cut off proceedings with the no standing line since she wrote that Chairman Cook cut off Taitz as to any adjudicatory decisions.
I didn’t make photos (just barely cut off on one). As you might be able to tell, Im not a local political junkie but its not out of choice.
Manchester Union Leader apparently has skipped this. Its not in newspaper or on website. I expected TV trucks, the works. There was only this little female from the Concord Vomitor.
By the way, I and younger brothers delivered that paper in our youths.
There were three handheld cameras of citizen reporters that I counted. There was not a single mainstream media person except the Vomitors reporterette and photographer? Why does the reporterette only cite a single woman shouted ? Taitz, per the Post and Mail article insertion, seems to be saying there were more but these would be non-mainstream.
I was thinking there how truly terrible, how woeful this whole situation is. There is no way to enter higher political positions and be a birther.
Adding to this, its been pretty near impossible to enter legitimate politics on any national scale nor any significant state scale while holding the Clinton ascendancy was due to his crime syndicate. That these two men have become president is beyond abysmal. One must pray for our country.
Check # 24 for on-the-scene New Hampshire report from FReeper BonRad.
Thanks, BonRad. Good job; we appreciate it.
Because BO was hiding behind VP Biden's (Constitutionally-eligible) skirts.
Just because VP Biden is Constitutionally eligible to hold his office (he was born in Scranton, PA of American citizen parents) that doesn't make BO eligible by some sort of legal osmosis.
One must pray for our country.
Indeed! We must pray for our country.
From a grateful Patriot
The WND and Jerome and Orly team.
I think they may be on Obama’s side, to make Obama’s opponents look incompetent and goofy.
They have done so.
Thank you, BonRad for the detailed report. What a sad day for our country when the constitution is disregarded. I’m so disgusted with the gutless wonders that call themselves politicians. Not one of them has the guts to challenge BH0. Everyone of them needs to go...clean house from top to bottom and start all over.
Thank you for your effort in attending and reporting. I agree with you 100%.
These two ‘men’ are what the democrat party and it’s voters have become. And they deny they are anti-American yet they hate the nation the Founders established else they would not be rushing headlong to destroy it for some nebulous European Socialist model with the European nations crumbling before their very eyes. It is ... demonic.
Don’t be so naive. Orly’s correct and those that fear her are trying to marginalize her. It’s classic Alinsky tactics.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.