Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Perry's congressional supporters wary of plan to cut lawmaker pay
The Hill ^ | November 20, 2011 | Debbie Siegelbaum

Posted on 11/20/2011 3:17:23 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

Lawmakers who've endorsed Rick Perry for president reacted warily to his plan for a part-time Congress and expressed concern about his proposal to cut their salaries in half.

In response to inquiries from The Hill, the lawmakers disagreed with some aspects of the plan but said they liked other parts, such as the idea of spending more time in their districts.

Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) vowed to continue to stand by Perry, although he wasn’t necessarily on board with all of the Texas governor's plans.

“I don’t anticipate that I’m going to agree with everything he says,” Inhofe said.

At issue was halving lawmaker pay, which according to Inhofe, could lead to an independently wealthy Congress run by “Rockefellers and people like that, many of whom don’t really have the sensitivities to the real world.”

According to Perry supporter Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-S.C.), we might already be there.

“With campaign finance reform laws being the way they are now, with McCain-Feingold, you’re almost moving to that anyway because it’s so hard to raise money that you almost have moved to a situation where there is a political class that runs,” he said....

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: allhatnocattle; amnesty; congressionalpay; heartless; lawmakers; moron; openborders; perry; perry2012; perryastroturfing; regulations; rino; tuition4illegals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-75 next last
Rick Perry on Congressional Insider Trading [:24]

******************

Nov. 13, 2011: “Pelosi fires back at ‘60 Minutes’ report on ‘soft corruption’”

“Pelosi and her husband participated in an initial public offering of Visa in 2008, according to CBS. They bought 5,000 shares at the initial price of $44; two days later, shares were trading at $64, CBS said.”.......... Source

1 posted on 11/20/2011 3:17:24 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All; shield

WWW.RICKPERRY.ORG

November 16, 2011

Dear Leader Pelosi,

After reading about House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer’s outburst over my “Overhauling Washington” plan, I wonder if his obstructionism reflects your own opposition and that of the Democratic Caucus to urgent reforms the American people so vehemently demand.

After increasing the debt by $4 trillion in less than three years, no one can believe that Americans are satisfied with business as usual, and that a permanent political class in Washington can get us out of the mess you and your colleagues have created.

A part-time Congress with half the pay would still make $38,000 a year more than the average American family. Do you truly oppose lawmakers spending more time in their districts? Is it so important for the Washington power brokers to build their fiefdoms of influence, including providing bailouts to Wall Street while businesses on Main Street are being boarded up every day?

Here is the fundamental question: do you believe Washington is broken? Before answering that question, consider these facts:

1) the Washington Metro area is now the most affluent metropolitan area in the country because lobbyists, contractors, elected officials and bureaucrats have been insulated from the economic ruin prevalent in the private sector;
2) Congressional office budgets have doubled since 2000 while employers all across America are laying off workers;
3) Our nation’s total debt is nearing the size of our nation’s economy, increasing our dependence on competitors like China;
4) The number of Americans out of work has increased by more than two million since January 2009, despite the massive stimulus package Democratic leaders promised would revive the economy, and;
5) on top of the job-killing spending policies of the previous Congress, employers are faced with a staggering $1.1 trillion in costs related to federal regulatory compliance.

Do you truly believe the answer to massive debt, over-regulation and bloated big-government policies is to continue to protect the status quo, which enriches and empowers Washington insiders at the expense of the American People?

My plan would overhaul Washington, eliminating certain agencies and reducing the size and scope of others. It will force Congress to make the tough decisions to balance the budget or require a further reduction in their pay. It would end lifetime appointments to future appointees to the federal bench. I don’t want to tinker around the edges when the American People demand a complete overhaul of Washington.

Let me conclude with an invitation: I am in Washington Monday and would love to engage you in a public debate about my Overhaul Washington plan versus the congressional status quo. I think it would be a tremendous service to the American public to see a public airing of these differences. Let the people decide. If Monday doesn’t work, perhaps we could find a time in Iowa over the course of the next month to discuss these issues in front of the people of America’s heartland.

Should you choose not to respond or engage in such a healthy discussion, I will take it to mean you will continue your obstructionist ways in the face of much needed Washington reform.

Sincerely,

Rick Perry
Governor of Texas


2 posted on 11/20/2011 3:17:52 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Texas Debt Clock

Uproot and Overhaul Washington

The Perry Plan: Energizing American Jobs and Security

The Perry Economic Plan: Cut, Balance and Grow

Texas, Austin exception to gloomy retail picture

3 posted on 11/20/2011 3:18:36 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Perry on Cavuto Nov 18, 2011.

Hannity’s 3rd Freedom Concert - Perry on America heroes! 7 minute video

Nov. 11, 2011 VIDEO: Rick Perry interview Nov 11, 2011 in Columbia 25 minute video – starting around 4:00 – 12:00 Perry speaks at length about Iran, allies and national defense.

The President says Americans are Lazy [:31]

4 posted on 11/20/2011 3:19:45 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The only problem I have here is Discount Rick saying he’ll work for half the price.

That comes across with the same credibility as fringe candidates who say the same thing.


5 posted on 11/20/2011 3:27:14 AM PST by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

I hope you read the article. Most who were interviewed or gave a quote were supportive of the idea.

Does that make them fringe?


6 posted on 11/20/2011 3:36:52 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Iowa candidate-tracker
7 posted on 11/20/2011 3:39:31 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper (For years the Left protested "the occupation of Iraq"- now they want to "Occupy" all across the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

I like his plan. Texas does fine with a part-time legislature. Congress just meddles in our lives too much. I can understand why that upsets the politicians.

And we need terms limits on them, too.


8 posted on 11/20/2011 3:43:42 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Cutting pay is ridiculous gimmickry and doesn’t solve the real issues.


9 posted on 11/20/2011 3:44:51 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Rick Perry has more red flags than a May Day Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Unless you’re prepared to put term limits on staffers, you’ll end up leaving them as the power behind the throne.


10 posted on 11/20/2011 3:45:47 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Rick Perry has more red flags than a May Day Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I did read the article and what they support is not spending a lot of time in Washington, not the cut in pay.

The issue with the cut in pay is that, it can make people more vulnerable to corruption.

That isn’t to say that congressmen are under paid.


11 posted on 11/20/2011 3:52:36 AM PST by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Cutting pay is ridiculous gimmickry and doesn’t solve the real issues.

It isn't if they do half the damage and head home to their districts to work at least half of the year.

You can pick each thing apart but when taken as a whole, the picture is clear.

Gov Perry's 3-Part Agenda:

Perry: Uproot and Overhaul Washington

The Perry Plan: Energizing American Jobs and Security

The Perry Economic Plan: Cut, Balance and Grow

Smart, limited government works for Texas:

Texas Debt Clock

12 posted on 11/20/2011 3:59:08 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Right now they do a lot of damage and over-regulate every detail of our lives. Congresscritters have an overinflated sense of their own place in the grand scheme of things. They need to be brought down to size.


13 posted on 11/20/2011 4:04:43 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
They look upon themselves as a ruling class.

Perry says he'll cut his salary in half.

Leadership.

Gov. Rick Perry: ...........“I’m going to support the Republican nominee. That isn’t even a question,” said Perry. “Our country is on the precipice of a huge economic disaster and foreign policy wise none of our allies know where America is going to be on any given day. We’ve got huge issues facing this country today and [Obama’s] in Burma talking about relations with a country that — I’ll be real honest with you — I don’t know what America’s interest is there.”

He also criticized the president for delaying a decision on the 1,700-mile pipeline from Alberta to Texas until after the 2012 election so a study can be carried out with respect to its impact on an environmentally sensitive area of Nebraska.

“That Canadian oil is going to go one of two ways,” said Perry. “It’s either going to go west to China or it’s going to go south to the United States. That’s not even a question about where that ought to be going. Our national security is in jeopardy with this president.”.......... Perry Pledges to Take Only Half Salary

14 posted on 11/20/2011 4:07:34 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

I want to know who intends to limit the power of an increasingly dictatorial office of president.


15 posted on 11/20/2011 4:08:50 AM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

So now you want us to believe congress critters? Yea, right. That will go over like a fart in a diving bell.

Right now I believe four of the Republicans, the four that voted against that awful “balanced on our backs” budget amendment. They stripped out all of the points like cap and balance that would have kept them from just raising taxes to cover their spending. It was tailor made for the Democrats and they were not smart enough to have taken it. Thank God most of them only read the title before voting for it.


16 posted on 11/20/2011 4:09:39 AM PST by mazda77 (and I am a Native Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

The “congress critters” didn’t bring this up, Gov. Rick Perry did and some stepped up to agree with Perry that Congress is in D.C. WAY too much.

Hard to say those aren’t correct sentiments. But you called them farts in a diving bell. Why should they bother then? You get the government you deserve.


17 posted on 11/20/2011 4:13:50 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

What Perry wants to do is reduce the need to go to Washington. What this means, in practical terms, is downloading more responsibility to the states, where it should have always been.

It may also mean, in practical terms, is that while Washington shrinks, state legislatures grow. But, because states are closer to the people, it’s less likely that they would become as corrupt as Washington.


18 posted on 11/20/2011 4:17:25 AM PST by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
You know and I know that we don't see eye to eye on Governor Rick Perry. Having said that, I will say that I back his plan for cutting back on the amount of time Congress is in Washington, I certainly agree with his offer to take a 50 percent salary cut and that lawmakers should do likewise.

Washington has become nothing but a millionaire's club, and being a millionaire isn't necessarily a bad thing, but America needs to return to a Jeffersonian approach regarding public office, i.e., "When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property.".

It isn't "fringe" as some of my fellow FReepers suggest, to propose a slashing of federal salaries, particularly those who allegedly are to serve the public interest. THEY work for us, not the other way around.

Perry seems to 'get' this, and I agree.
19 posted on 11/20/2011 4:28:55 AM PST by mkjessup (I stand with Herman Cain, a God-fearing, Jesus-loving, Constitution-honoring PATRIOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I think Perry is your best bet, in that regard.
His record indicates an honest interest in reducing government and making it abide by its constitutional limits.

We know Romney won’t and Newt has had plenty of opportunity to put pressure on the House and Senate to do that and Cain, I think, is too inexperienced to know necessarily how to do that.


20 posted on 11/20/2011 4:33:08 AM PST by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

The pay a Congress critter makes is not that important to them anyway.
That is not where the real perks come in.

They real deal comes from Insider trading, Lobbyists who give them free stuff under the table, trips around the world on our dime. Deals here and a gifts there.A staff of people to kiss their ass daily, free rides, the perks are amazing, they live like kings at our expense.

Some of the new members probably need the salary for a while , but for some reason those who have been there a while say 25 to 30 years appear to do very well with that salary.The salary and the treasure chest campaign slush funds they build up.


21 posted on 11/20/2011 4:36:42 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

The fact that he talks about making congress do anything is unconstitutional at best.


22 posted on 11/20/2011 4:40:56 AM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

That’s why getting them out of Washington and back to the people is so critical.

I think a worthy idea, if somebody could be so kind to forward it to Rick Perry is to have each congress person, when they vote, to have to vote in their district.

Kinda hard to vote to fill their purse strings when their vote are televised and watched by their constituents. Don’t allow them to vote when they are in Washington, when they have some amount of cover.


23 posted on 11/20/2011 4:45:38 AM PST by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

he is also saying everyone in WDC should be doing the same - I agree with him


24 posted on 11/20/2011 4:52:07 AM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Cutting pay is ridiculous gimmickry and doesn’t solve the real issues.

Going part time and spending more time in their districts and not rooting themselves in DC is enticing however.

I question how much a POTUS can do to make it happen but it is a good idea IMO.

25 posted on 11/20/2011 4:57:48 AM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Staffers in Congress and in the Federal agencies flourish in the rat-holes of influence.

They are overpaid, stay too long - and by necessity are ‘big government’ advocates.

Job security!


26 posted on 11/20/2011 4:58:37 AM PST by sodpoodle (Loving America is not a fashion statement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Won’t be La Raza Rick, especially since he set himself up as Dictator-for-Life of Tejas.


27 posted on 11/20/2011 4:58:57 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Rick Perry has more red flags than a May Day Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

What Perry WANTS is to get elected President. That’s it.


28 posted on 11/20/2011 5:00:33 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Rick Perry has more red flags than a May Day Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
Iowa doesn't speak for me or anyone I know. Looking at their polls, I don't think Iowans are nearly as politically smart as they think they are.
29 posted on 11/20/2011 5:00:47 AM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I want to know who intends to limit the power of an increasingly dictatorial office of president.

Ron Paul is the only one I've heard so far.

30 posted on 11/20/2011 5:01:47 AM PST by uptoolate (For the record: I have complete assurance that nothing can pluck me from His hand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Cutting salaries exclusively of Congressmembers will only ensure that nothing but millionaires serve. Those folks of modest means (more likely OUR people) won’t be able to afford to do so. It’s the bureaucracy that needs to be cut down.


31 posted on 11/20/2011 5:03:15 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Rick Perry has more red flags than a May Day Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
Sure, sounds good... but any real changes to how long Congress remains in session would have to come from them. You can probably blame air conditioning for these neverending sessions, since in the past the heat of DC summers would cut them short.
32 posted on 11/20/2011 5:07:16 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Rick Perry has more red flags than a May Day Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

They all want to be elected president.

It is just a question of how much you believe they’ll attempt to follow through on their promises.

And Perry has a record of downloading responsibility unto the people and away from government.


33 posted on 11/20/2011 5:08:47 AM PST by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

Yup. And they’re like a cancer that keeps spreading, larger gubmint begatting larger gubmint until the costs bankrupt us, and we’ve reached critical mass. I’m in favor of getting rid of civil service... they are overrun by leftists permanently ensconced regardless of whom is in power in the Exec/Congress/SCOTUS. Let it go back to the 19th century standards of filling it with your people for 2/4/8 years and out you go for the next administration. At least we know who those hacks will be loyal to.


34 posted on 11/20/2011 5:10:39 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Rick Perry has more red flags than a May Day Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
The fact that he talks about making congress do anything is unconstitutional at best.

How so?

35 posted on 11/20/2011 5:10:40 AM PST by uptoolate (For the record: I have complete assurance that nothing can pluck me from His hand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Coming from a man who is an opportunistic career politician who refuses to relinquish the Governorship after a reasonable period of time, his claims to support “limited Government” is highly laughable. Watch what politicians DO, not just what they say.


36 posted on 11/20/2011 5:14:23 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Rick Perry has more red flags than a May Day Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: uptoolate

Because a president is only one branch of co equal branches of government. A president can’t dictate when the legislative branch works or how much they’re paid. He can only ask.


37 posted on 11/20/2011 5:19:38 AM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

I’m not sure if, as long as he’s doing his job to the satisfaction of his constituents, if it’s necessary for him to resign his position.

Most people don’t resign their jobs, if they are applying for work elsewhere or preparing for new careers. You’d have to make the case to me the necessity of a politician resigning, if he’s still able to do his job in a responsible manner.


38 posted on 11/20/2011 5:22:00 AM PST by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Because a president is only one branch of co equal branches of government. A president can’t dictate when the legislative branch works or how much they’re paid. He can only ask.

I didn't see anything in the article that indicates a "dictation" to Congress. I see a man with a "plan proposed" and seeking Congressional supporters. Has he mentioned in maybe other speeches about this topic of using an "Executive Order" to accomplish this? I am not aware of any but maybe you have. If so, could you direct me to that info?

39 posted on 11/20/2011 5:27:50 AM PST by uptoolate (For the record: I have complete assurance that nothing can pluck me from His hand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Congressional salaries are minuscule in comparison to the cost of the perks the Congresspersons receive.

If anything needs to be cut, it is their $multi-million in perks.

40 posted on 11/20/2011 5:31:43 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The cut in pay was the headline, but not the main thrust of Perry’s reforms. While I would agree the paycut is mostly a gimmick, there is more substance here than that.

And after all, it’s not congressional pay that is anyone’s problem. It’s congressional action. And cutting THAT - which Perry is also for - is a winner IMO.


41 posted on 11/20/2011 5:43:08 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

They take in more via self dealing and other larceny. Why are they worried ?


42 posted on 11/20/2011 5:46:45 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

>> I’m in favor of getting rid of civil service... they are overrun by leftists permanently ensconced regardless of whom is in power in the Exec/Congress/SCOTUS. Let it go back to the 19th century standards of filling it with your people for 2/4/8 years and out you go for the next administration. At least we know who those hacks will be loyal to. >>

You are correct about that, though government is so doggoned big now that you could never even finish your hiring process in 8 years. But your concept is dead on and it is THIS permanent political class - MORE THAN CONGRESS itself - which might be the problem.


43 posted on 11/20/2011 5:52:55 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Perry is the poster boy for term limits in Texas (ditto for KBH).


44 posted on 11/20/2011 5:55:37 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Rick Perry has more red flags than a May Day Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
I’m in favor of getting rid of civil service... they are overrun by leftists permanently ensconced regardless of whom is in power in the Exec/Congress/SCOTUS.

Quite a part large of the civil service is civilian support for the military. Everything from pay clerks to equipment re-builders. Several years ago, some states reserve and national guard had test programs using contractors to repair and service equipment. That was a colossal failure. Most of the civil service has to also be a military member.

45 posted on 11/20/2011 6:10:21 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Dear God, thanks for the rain, but please let it rain more in Texas. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Cutting salaries exclusively of Congressmembers will only ensure that nothing but millionaires serve. Those folks of modest means (more likely OUR people) won’t be able to afford to do so. It’s the bureaucracy that needs to be cut down.

Actually you have it backwards. We have millionaires serving now, almost exclusively. A low salary, coupled with laws which would eliminate most of the perks of a legislature member, would mean more ordinary citizens would serve and it would help to eliminate the permanent politicians. The fact is, even with their pay cut in half, they would still be earning much more than the average wage earner in this country.

Along with the pay cuts and perks elimination we would have to make sure their health plans and their retirements were done away with and make them have to draw SS. We would see some action on SS if that happens, I can guarantee it.

46 posted on 11/20/2011 6:10:51 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Yes, all those trips over seas to study other countries economies, etc when we are self destructing here in our country. One involved 10 members of Congress and their wives who went to Italy for 10 days to see how Italy’s economy worked.

I think term limits and for the House of Reps to write a bill stating that they are no longer immune from insider trading is the ticket. I wish the Repubs would have the balls to write a bill changing that rule regarding insider trading issue. That would win over lot of folks.


47 posted on 11/20/2011 6:19:54 AM PST by Engedi (Hec)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Cutting salaries exclusively of Congressmembers will only ensure that nothing but millionaires serve. Those folks of modest means (more likely OUR people) won’t be able to afford to do so. It’s the bureaucracy that needs to be cut down.

Point taken. The fact is, we need TERM LIMITS combined with (just pulling a random figure out of my azz here) a 14 year FREEZE on ALL congressional salaries (elected and support staff alike), in addition to a freeze on hiring.

OR how about a stipulation that any new member of Congress with a net worth of over (again, just a random number) say, 3 million dollars will NOT receive a congressional salary but will serve in the public interest in lieu of any paid wages?
48 posted on 11/20/2011 6:23:04 AM PST by mkjessup (I stand with Herman Cain, a God-fearing, Jesus-loving, Constitution-honoring PATRIOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Again, in your zeal, you missed entirely what I said.

Why, when it suits your agenda, should we start to believe in what people in congress say to us. I want to clean the entire cesspool out, even the ones who pander to what they think are our agendas. Most of us only have one and it starts with 1791.

Until you get past that, you are just flatulence in the wind.


49 posted on 11/20/2011 6:31:02 AM PST by mazda77 (and I am a Native Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; RoosterRedux; jonrick46; deepbluesea; RockinRight; TexMom7; potlatch; ...
Perry Ping....

IF you'd rather NOT be pinged FReepmail me.

IF you'd like to be added FReepmail me. Thanks.

*****************************************************************************************************************************************************


50 posted on 11/20/2011 6:50:29 AM PST by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson