Skip to comments.Freep this poll! (Should Occupy be forced to get a permit to camp on city land?)
Posted on 11/21/2011 5:15:00 PM PST by DeusExMachina05
BANGOR, Maine Occupy protesters in Bangor, Aroostook County, Portland and Augusta all are readying themselves for a long winters stay as the municipal rules governing their occupations and cold temperatures increase.
Theyre also brushing up on their knowledge of municipal regulations, and so are community officials.
(Excerpt) Read more at bangordailynews.com ...
FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)
At least all the permits and fees demanded of TeaParties across the exceptional American nation!!!
I voted yes per your request, but I don’t think they should be allowed to “camp” on city land, period.
Is there currently an ordinance against camping on city property? If so then yes they should get a permit. If no then let them stay and fight them with TRUTH. It might be harder but it is the right way to fight this. Law is crap and truth is truth.
I hear you, but anything to make them see they have no support among the population. Psych war here.
How many times do you want me to vote Boss?
That’s why you got my vote. ;>)
91.92 % now.
The Anarchist bass turds hate the Constitution but they’ll invoke it when it suits their purposes.
Time to bring out the K-9 units for some happy doggies fun time and clear out the parks.
Over 90% of the responses thought they should get a permit when I FReeped.
Just stop it!
These OWS (Obama World Squatters) are violating the LOITERING laws of EVERY city that they “camp” in.
So just stop it by enforcing, (with pepper spray if necessary), the local loitering laws.
Yes 91.58% (174 votes)
No 8.42% (16 votes)
Yes 91.15% (175 votes)
No 8.85% (17 votes)
Total Votes: 192
Wait a second. Aren’t they already required to do this? Whenever we had a Tea Party rally we had to get permits, make sure the area was left clean and there was no camping out and disrupting traffic.
Would anyone and everyone else be allowed to camp there? The article makes it sound like the city officials have no idea.
“No 8.85% (17 votes)”
Only 17 Communist, so far.
In reality, these “Oh We Stinkers” are nothing more then hippie throwbacks looking for a party.
That’s how I would have voted as well.
Yes 91.36% (328 votes)
No 8.64% (31 votes)
Total Votes: 359
What the (BLEEP), just suit yerself, my FRiend!!! (grin)
Why did the Occupier cross the road?
Because his Mom called and said, “It’s time to come home, honey.”
Because ‘Ketchup’ broke her glasses during a fit of righteous crying and had to go to Lynz-Krafterz.
Because some radicals thought “free love” meant “unsolicited surprise sex.”
Because three homeless guys were occupying his tent “Help, police...”
Because a few “more-equal-than-thous” (aka, Party people) appropriated [sic, smoked up] his stach for the Greater Good — he had to score another bag of kind bud
Because the police car looked like a port-o-john
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.