Skip to comments.The Secrets of Soros, Obama, Occupiers and the MSM (Part 2 of 3)
Posted on 11/22/2011 4:51:53 AM PST by Kaslin
Last week, I discussed how Occupy protesters are being directly aided by the mainstream media and indirectly aided by White House stimulus money, as well as New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg's and even Vice President Joe Biden's households. I also detailed how the mainstream media are accelerating their progressive blitz not only to hasten the second coming, or election, of President Barack Obama but also to help him and other progressives in reaching their final goal of "fundamentally transforming the United States of America."
I believe the MSM are also bent to coronate a particular GOP candidate whom they feel could be beaten most easily by Obama. I believe that candidate is former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, for the sole fact that the powers behind the MSM believe his presidential run would fracture the Republican Party and cause a third-party candidate to run, dividing the conservative vote, just as Ross Perot did in 1992 and 1996.
With still two months before the Iowa caucuses and three top-tier candidates vying for the GOP nomination, should Romney become the GOP nominee, as the MSM and the White House believe? I pray that what they believe will not be the case.
Obama himself is only a pawn in the parade of progressivism. And behind the White House and MSM curtains are progressive billionaire power brokers and globalists, such as George Soros, who are wielding their finances and pulling the strings in more than 30 major puppet networks, including The New York Times, The Associated Press, The Washington Post, NBC and ABC.
And those progressive agents are at it again right now in the series of GOP presidential debates. Does anyone really believe questions coming from MSM moderators aren't ultimately asked to trip up the candidates and then elevate and orchestrate the re-election of their furor? The entire debate system should be derailed from the MSM and played out exclusively on C-SPAN with questions being fed in via the Internet from people around the 50 states.
Soros is spreading his dominion to control states' voting processes, too. Bubbling up in the progressive boiler for months has been the state of Wisconsin, which The New York Times called "a swing state in more ways than one." Snopes.com researchers actually just confessed a week ago that they couldn't verify the report that Soros holds a "significant ownership stake" in the companies that are tabulating the electronic votes in Wisconsin, but what about a "partial" ownership stake?
What we can document for certain is that Media Trackers, a "non-profit, non-partisan investigative watchdog dedicated to promoting accountability in the media and government across Wisconsin," discovered that Soros and his Open Society Foundations are financing the new Wisconsin section of the website MapLight, allegedly designed to draw "back the curtain on how money influences legislation around the issues that people care most about." Right. Draw back the curtain? Meaning a voting curtain? Interesting terminology. MapLight is the 15th organization in Wisconsin financed by Soros' grants.
But those progressive political connections are all just coincidental, conspiratorial and inconsequential, right? And I suppose Soros' five visits to the White House were only to hang out in the Rose Garden and sip Obama's new beer? More likely, they were talking about the implementation of Agenda 21, a United Nations program launched in 1992 for the nebulous purpose of reaching global "sustainable development" but which actually promotes a European socialist system that would chip away our freedoms, liberties and rights.
At the heart of that global and social change agenda is the use of nongovernmental organizations, civil resistance movements and class warfare protests, such as Occupy's "Day of Action" last week in New York. One Occupy website even embraces Agenda 21 as the agenda for the movement.
Indeed, the MSM have fueled the Occupy movement by broadcasting its every move for thousands of hours, exaggerating its expansion and even condoning and minimizing the violent acts of the protesters. For example, though at least 12 New York police officers were injured last week during the protest, the MSM insinuated law enforcement exaggeration, noting that they were merely "reported injured." MSNBC even jumbled the number of injured law officers, appearing to place a numerical emphasis on injured protesters: "Seven police officers and 10 protesters were injured. Five other officers were treated after being hit in the face with stinging liquid."
Bottom line, these Occupy protests are nothing short of plays taken straight from the playbook of another Chicago progressive, Saul Alinsky, who pioneered civil disobedience in his "Rules for Radicals." In it, Alinsky plotted: "The job of the organizer is to maneuver and bait the establishment so that it will publicly attack him as a 'dangerous enemy.' ... The organizer dedicated to changing the life of a particular community must first rub raw the resentments of the people of the community; fan the latent hostilities of many of the people to the point of overt expression." But do Americans really want to get their social marching orders from a book that was dedicated to the "first radical" himself, Lucifer? No joke.
You've got to hand it to progressives for their success in erecting their kingdom and implementing their plan: Take over the institutions of higher education, and indoctrinate our youth; then commission them into key areas -- such as journalism, government and teaching -- where they can feed the progressive machine via media networks, politics and public schools, creating minions for the next generation.
(In Part 3, I will address not only exactly what the meaning and goal are of progressives' "fundamentally transforming the United States of America" but also what I believe we can do to stop that onslaught from overturning our republic.)
Every Secretary of State must face impeachment if they certify Obama’s eligibility to run for re-election. I notice Orly was starting this already in New Hampshire.
The only idea that makes any sense of this is that Soros is setting the U.S. up to abandon soveriegnty to a one world gov’t. I can’t imagine anyother objective.
Lemon Demon ~ Ultimate Showdown Of Ultimate Destiny
While Norris is doing well as a private citizen articulating conservative ideology, the typos and the occasional nonsquitur in this piece made me suddenly miss Sarah’s clarity and passion.
His take, they are ripping us off, massive dollars, no fear of being caught. (Fed,stimulus,trading, DOE...) Then collapse the system, hide the evidence, create chaos.. roll it into new system being set up by Soros
Oh, there’s no doubt in my mind that Soros sees himself getting rich in this process; but as for a “new system being set up by Soros”, I’ve got some questions and reservations. I don’t think Soros sees himself setting up the new system so much as he’s a player in the “World Bank” system idea with a one world reserve currency, not the dollar and he’s pushing this by orchestrating implementation of Agenda 21 throughout the country. He profited collapsing the pound; now he wants to profit collapsing the Dollar. The Agenda 21/One World Gov’t types have many problems with the U.S.; one is the Constitution which hampers abandonment of soveriegnty, the other is private property rights. The “response” to the housing/mortgage mess is to effectively “nationalize” the mortage/home ownership system. The feds are buying up the loans, then foreclosing which means they own the homes and then leasing them back to the previous homeowners or selling them but holding the paper. In California, their using regulations to evict people from unimproved rural real property, effectively confiscating the land by way of regulation. The health care law can be used to scarf up property; people who don’t comply will be fined, then levied on by the IRS; people forget the IRS can take anything and everything to satisfy a debt to the IRS and bankruptcy filings don’t stop them.
So, I see Soros as part of the New World Order bunch that GHW Bush talked about and that’s a big part of the problem; the country club/Big Government Republicans are as much a part of this cabal as are the Liberal Democrats; they just go at the problem from a different angle. Romney is so close to Obama they may as well be brothers, only, obviously with different fathers.
Are you saying that a vote for Romney is equal to a vote for Obama? I don’t see how that is true but I am keeping an open mind on all the candidates. Please explain how Romney would be just as bad as Obama.
I’ll be skewered for this but here goes. First, I’m not equating a vote for Romney to be as bad as a vote for Obama; Romney will take the U.S. down the same road Obama would, only at a slower pace. When I said that Obama and Romney are like “brothers” what I mean is that while they would employ different techniques, they take the U.S. toward the same end goal. Here’s an example of how to look at that; if you put on the “Liberal” glasses and take a look at Obama, he appears to be too much in the “center” and thus he’s a tremendous disappointment to the “Liberal”, many of whom will tell you that he’s essentially just followed Bush’s formulas. Then too, if you look at Bush through a Conservatives glasses, he looks too liberal.
Now take a look at what both Bush and Obama did; they bailed out the banks. Its all been all about the banks. And there’s a simple reason for that.......since the creation of the Federal Reserve Board, which is actually composed of private banks, the “Wizard” behind the screen that controls everything is the Federal Reserve Board.
Don’t get me wrong, if I had to make the choice between Obama or Romney, I’d hold my nose and vote for Romney. The reason being that while they both take us the same way, they do it with different flavors. Obama takes us to the goal of One World Gov’t under the New World Order by way of confiscation of private property, euthanasia, a police state, etc. Romney would take us there via highly regulated capitalism, outsourcing, devaluation of the currency, globalization of trade and euthanasia via the Morphine Drip.
The essence of the difference is that Democrats take from the productive and give to the gov’t and ration out money and property to “their” people while their friends on the Republican side of the aisle employ the productive to funnel wealth to the Corporations who take from the productive to give to the rest of the world. With the Republicans, you get to live longer and die with more toys.
Now that I’ve clued you in to this, learn how to discern the “game”. Ever notice the awesome speed with which the Military was able to assemble forces and invade Iraq? Wonder how that was done? It was an “Off the Shelf” game plan that had been prepared and written years ago. Ever notice how quickly the Dems came up with Obamacare, wrote the legislation and got it passed? How did they do that so fast? It was an “Off the Shelf” game plan, written years ago with the help of the Kleptocrats at the Insurance company lobby.
Were you surprised at the speed with which the Arab Spring took down the regimes in Tunisia, then Egypt, then Libya and now they’re working on Syria? “Off the Shelf” Game plan sponsored by NATO, courtesy of MI-6, the CIA and French and Italian secret services.
As Sherlock Holmes would say, “the games afoot Watson”; the job now is to figure out what’s coming off the shelf so we can prosper therefrom! My money’s on Gingrich and Haliburton.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.