Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt had his chance, but he blew it: Why Gingrich won’t earn the 2012 GOP presidential nomination
NY Daily News ^ | 11-23-11 | SE Cupp

Posted on 11/23/2011 5:22:45 AM PST by MNJohnnie

I was only 15 in 1994, when Newt Gingrich experienced his last great moment. (Well, before this one, where he’s surging in the polls, with his campaign having figured out how to run for President.) So I don’t really remember Newt’s glory days.

I have interviewed him on many occasions, however, as far back as 2006 and as recently as last month, and every time we talk, I’m struck by how smart he is. Despite that, I can’t get past the nagging voice in my head telling me that no matter how good he would be at running the country, he doesn’t deserve to.

Call me a square, but Newt’s past mistakes occupy both columns: character and politics. From his ugly romantic entanglements to his flirtation with environmentalism to his questionable relationship with Freddie Mac, bad decisions and lapses in judgment have been too frequent for a man of such obvious intelligence.

And yet, for all his mistakes, Newt remains startlingly unembarrassed, which makes those mistakes even less palatable. Though arrogance and a lack of shame characterize Capitol Hill, I’m suspicious of a guy who’s had so many public errors, and is so untroubled by them.

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2012; campaign; freddie; gingrich; hitpiece; newt; newtgingrich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-190 next last
Seems cracks are appearing in the PR image being painted by the Newt Campaign.
1 posted on 11/23/2011 5:22:45 AM PST by MNJohnnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

The cracks have been there all along. His supporters just demand we ignore them.


2 posted on 11/23/2011 5:26:12 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Yawn.

“Hey, guys......someone else is in the lead now who’s not Cain....DESROY THEM!!!!!!”

Yawn.


3 posted on 11/23/2011 5:26:24 AM PST by TitansAFC ("..then propose a reasonable program for the 12 million (illegals) who broke our laws" - Herman Cain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Newty is fundamentally a creature of DC. He was kicked out for his Contract with America.


4 posted on 11/23/2011 5:26:47 AM PST by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Newtfail.


5 posted on 11/23/2011 5:28:22 AM PST by snowrip (Liberal? You are a socialist idiot with no rational argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

I don’t click on that dangerous website. Is she talking about last night?


6 posted on 11/23/2011 5:28:33 AM PST by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Question about Newt's comments on illegals last night.

He basically said that he expects that 50% would go back of their own volition, but ( paraphrasing) was it "realistic to want to see people, neighbors, who had been here for 25 years, put down roots..sent packing."

Bachmann and Mitt jumped on this, called it amnesty...

Whether or not one agrees with Newt, there's one questio that I'd like him, or maybe one of his supporters, to answer:

That other 50% of illegals he mentions, those here for years. There is no way that they vast majority of them could have stayed, put down roots, without doing something illegal to obtain a false identity, social security #..whatever. IOW..a crime...an overt act. Should they, according to Newt's vision, be deported?

7 posted on 11/23/2011 5:28:44 AM PST by ken5050 (Support Admin Mods: Doing the tough, hard, dirty jobs that Americans won't do...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Yep. Though Newt may be the only adult in the GOP room at times, he’s still a RINO. I’m glad Bachmann went after him. Too bad the Texas. Governor didn’t do the same.


8 posted on 11/23/2011 5:31:15 AM PST by rintense (ABO is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
"...no matter how good he would be at running the country, he doesn’t deserve to."

Doesn't "deserve to"? What exactly has this to do with anything? If I am hiring someone to do a very important job for me (and what is more important then correctly overseeing the operation of the country?), I want the man best able to do the job. The author makes this look like some sort of an award for good behavior handed to a politician, without regard for the enormity of the responsibility of the job and whether the winner has the ability to perform.

9 posted on 11/23/2011 5:31:49 AM PST by 101voodoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Yes, everybody knows MNJohnnie’s agenda, but it is Newt who is in the news because he is the alleged frontrunner who just had a Rick Perry moment last night.


10 posted on 11/23/2011 5:31:52 AM PST by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mo

Not the Contract for America-— in fact that propelled him to the leadership. He resigned before being kicked out due to his questionable ethics. Republicans want better of their leaders.

Never forget that Gingrich supported some very liberal stuff since leaving office.


11 posted on 11/23/2011 5:32:50 AM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
There is no way that in the US we would roundup every illegal immigrant - there are about 12 million of the illegal immigrants - not only economically is that just an impossibility but that's not a humane way anyway to deal with the issue that we face with illegal immigration. Sarah Palin.

I do not support Newt for President but it's hilarious how most of the Cain supporters are broken hearted Palin backers. They trash every candidate so Cain, who has got to be one of the worst candidates ever invented, can look better. These are the same people who would mercilessly destroy anyone who questioned Palin just a few month ago. Crazy crazy crazy.

12 posted on 11/23/2011 5:33:23 AM PST by normy (Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Newt wants to legitimize illegals who have been in this country for a long time.

Sorry Newt, that is unacceptable. A real conservative wouldn't consider amnesty to illegals in any way, shape or form. Right there, we know that his carefully crafted image as a conservative is phony. America does not need a fake conservative.

13 posted on 11/23/2011 5:33:50 AM PST by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Do you believe Newt Gingrich is a legitimate threat to grab the GOP nomination?

What part of media bias do you enjoy when it's not your candidate? So it appears you go off the conservative plantation when it suits you, also.
14 posted on 11/23/2011 5:34:29 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

Newt Gringo the compassionate one with a heart.


15 posted on 11/23/2011 5:35:00 AM PST by bigdirty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rintense

“Though Newt may be the only adult in the GOP room at times”

Please, it’s still too early for a belly laugh. I know 18 year-olds who behave more like an adult than Newt Gingrich.


16 posted on 11/23/2011 5:35:03 AM PST by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

I think, although at first swayed by Newt’s comments, I now just think it skirts the obvious CURRENT BIT TIME PROBLEM of the millions who have recently come here.

And the problem of the rule of law.

Illegal is illegal. And if someone has been here for 25 years, are they going to pay back taxes, reimburse taxpayers for all the services they’ve used over those 25 years?

How many have actually been living here for 25 years illegally? Weren’t most who came 25 years ago actually given citizenship throught amnesty signed by Reagan?


17 posted on 11/23/2011 5:35:03 AM PST by LibsRJerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
SE Cupp on right

18 posted on 11/23/2011 5:35:47 AM PST by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: normy

You Krishnas accusing anyone of trashing other candidates is a hoot. You and your ilk are just mad because the Palin people didn’t fall behind Perry.


19 posted on 11/23/2011 5:36:46 AM PST by rintense (ABO is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mo
Newty is fundamentally a creature of DC.

And that right there is more than enough for me.

My personal ticket would be a Cain/Bachmann ticket. Between them their fiscal ideas are rock solid and Bachmann is strong on foreign policy.
20 posted on 11/23/2011 5:38:03 AM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Newt's more than a RINO. He is a complete creature of the Beltway. And he simply appears incapable of understanding how things really work outside of the Beltway.

He acts like he is willing to take the consequences for his position on amnesty. OK, just what are those consequences?

Wow, he might not win the nomination.

He can go right back to milking his Beltway influence - a job where he does not have to compete with illegals and where illegals will not drive his wages down like has been done with meatpacking, construction and many other jobs.

He can afford a home in a nice gated community so he doesn't have to live next to any illegals.

He can go to a top-tier hospital that is not bogged down with treating illegals as mandated by the fedgov.

And the tax bite to pay for government bennies for illegals is just a tiny nibble out of his pay, as opposed to a big, wet bite for a regular working stiff.

And that is my point entirely - Newt only sees possible consequences to his own ambitions - he has no clue (like most Beltway types) as to how his self-inflated sense of humanity impacts those of us in the real world outside the Beltway.

And that is why he should never be the nominee.

21 posted on 11/23/2011 5:38:16 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

100% spot on, dirtboy.


22 posted on 11/23/2011 5:39:18 AM PST by rintense (ABO is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ngat

>> Yes, everybody knows MNJohnnie’s agenda, but it is Newt who is in the news because he is the alleged frontrunner who just had a Rick Perry moment last night. <<

That’s a pretty accurate statement. I would call it a semi Perry moment. Of course, it begs one question and muddies another truth.

The question is, do we really think under any circumstances that there will be any “rounding up” of illegals for the purpose of deportation? Of course not, under any President.

And the main point it muddies? That we must start by stopping the bleeding: CLOSE THE BORDER. If we don’t do that, then nothing else matters.

And on that issue, I think they all agree. So until that happens, nothing about what happens later is even going to effect our lives.


23 posted on 11/23/2011 5:40:12 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rintense

Can you imagine —we elect a Republican house and senate, begin to try to enforce the laws on the books, return power to the states ...and President Gingrich tries to stop it all so Jose who’s been here for 25 years can continue to stay here illegally?

So what’s Newt going to do about the ones who have only been here 10 years or less? What are the details about that situation? He’d better come out and clarify it, or he’s lost my vote.


24 posted on 11/23/2011 5:40:43 AM PST by LibsRJerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rintense
I would prefer to ask the supporters of every other candidate.

I can't wait until Cain is actually on the hot seat to state soundly his position on deportation of illegal immigrants. My thought is he will reiterate Newts point to a T and you and others will twist yourself into a knot defending it. That's ok by me.

Cain should be judged on his lack of knowledge on issues and his desire to be voted for because of his advisers.

I saw one Cain guy suggest a Cain/Newt ticket. Why? Why not just vote for Newt if that's the case?

25 posted on 11/23/2011 5:42:10 AM PST by normy (Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
I think Newt is not as big of a liar as most of them, and his mouth gets him in trouble.

The question of deporting illegals with long residence and US-born families is, as a political question, resolved. It will never happen, for reasons both good (we are a kind people) and bad (business likes illegals).

I am a Newt supporter, and it aggravates me to see him slammed for this, because the intense border control supporters have lost election after election after election, even in the districts which should be most favorable to their cause.

THERE IS NOT AND NEVER WILL BE A MAJORITY FOR DEPORTATION OF MOST ILLEGALS.

I think, on the whole, that this is a bad thing, because it is a symptom of weakness in our culture - but just because I think that doesn't mean we should nominate a man certain to lose because of a pro-deportation stance.

A position to the right of Obama on this question can attract majority support.

A position favoring deporting the pool boy and the maid, together with their US citizen children, is a certain loser, and this has been demonstrated in elections in California, Arizona, Colorado, etc, and it has been demonstrated many times over many years.

26 posted on 11/23/2011 5:43:07 AM PST by Jim Noble (To live peacefully with credit-based consumption and fiat money, men would have to be angels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Newt is the first to admit he has made mistakes. He says so all the time. The point is that if elected he would be strong center-right. He has a plan that is a 65% + agenda. English as national language, strong defense, deficit reduction, Social Security reform, and flat tax alternatives.

It has taken the better part of a century of massive Liberalism in this country to get us where we are today. We need a center right agenda and at least several decades to get us back on track. Newt would start to get us back on track. Bachman would get us back on track, Perry would start to get us back on track, so would Cain. Romney would be the least effective of the field at returning us to a more Constitutional based Federal Government.

Newt knows DC and he knows how to move legislation. He would be fine. What we can not afford is another four years of the nightmare we are living now.

Lots of people, including those here on FR, tend to believe that the natural state of man and society is that of freedom. Nothing could be further from the truth. We are now on the precipice of falling into tyranny, Obama would love to further erode our liberties. Newt would move us away from the brink, as would most of the Republican field.

Make no mistake, ALL our candidates will be blasted by the mainstream media and many on the right. S.E. is a little more boobs than brains, somewhat right and mostly wrong on what she perceives to be the best course. Two debates with Newt and Obama is toast. If he is able to jawbone Obama into seven Lincoln/Douglas style debates Obama will be buried in a land slide. Now is not the time to beet ourselves. It is time to push forward and defeat Obama, before it is too late.

27 posted on 11/23/2011 5:44:26 AM PST by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: MNJohnnie

This leaves us with either President Romney or Hussein.


29 posted on 11/23/2011 5:47:27 AM PST by WayneM (Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
That's a good point. However, who in their right mind thinks we will ever deport ALL the illegals who are here now. MB and Mitt know that, also, and are being deceitful.

Those two, MB/MR, work hand in hand. Ron Paul said it - it will never happen. Newt is being realistic and NOT tickling the ears of conservatives. America has to own up to her own failures. To expel those who have been here for 20/25 yrs and have settled down to a good way of life - we must eat as our own failure. If they get rid of the rest, it will be a huge accomplishment and I'm all for it. I doubt Mitt is - who would do his manicured lawn.
30 posted on 11/23/2011 5:48:10 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rintense
It's always Perry's fault with you.

Guess that makes it easier to watch Cain deconstructing.

31 posted on 11/23/2011 5:48:56 AM PST by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

>> THERE IS NOT AND NEVER WILL BE A MAJORITY FOR DEPORTATION OF MOST ILLEGALS.
A position to the right of Obama on this question can attract majority support.
A position favoring deporting the pool boy and the maid, together with their US citizen children, is a certain loser, and this has been demonstrated in elections in California, Arizona, Colorado, etc, and it has been demonstrated many times over many years. >>

You are right on that - which means the only issue is what do we do with the border. Next are the entitlements the illegals receive. Then there’s the criminal activity, and those should be deported. If we fixed those 3 issues, 98% of the problems would be gone.

And all the candidates know that. None of them will even think of starting a deportation campaign. Illegal immigration, hate to break it to you, is merely a misdemeanor. We may not like that, but that is the law.

This problem is where it is due to 50 years of a weak border and an awful Mexican economy. Fix the border, and it will unwind itself over maybe ten years and will do so without much cost.


32 posted on 11/23/2011 5:50:32 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

Good ‘common sense’ post. Thanks.


33 posted on 11/23/2011 5:50:46 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Yawn... “Hey, guys......someone else is in the lead now who’s not Cain....DESROY THEM!!!!!!” Yawn.

Nope, you've got this one wrong. This is not "liberal destruction of a conservative" ... this is SELF DESTRUCTION! There's a stark distinction.

34 posted on 11/23/2011 5:51:21 AM PST by ThePatriotsFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

Hey, you guys are the ones claiming Perry is the immigration expert. If he didn’t take Newt to task last night, that’s another missed opportunity for Perry to set himself apart. As a Perrywinkles, YOU should know that.


35 posted on 11/23/2011 5:51:46 AM PST by rintense (ABO is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: normy
Crazy crazy crazy

Go Bachman, Perry, Cain, Newt,...

Not crazy, pretty normal if you remember the 2008 primary. Is it time to cycle back around or will everybody just wait for Palin to tell them what to do?

36 posted on 11/23/2011 5:52:07 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Maybe someone should get the commies view on the illegals and match it up with the repubs. Also why should the people standing in the legal line and waiting years be punished vs someone who just walks across the border and takes up with govt benefits etc. I know of a legal immigrant who waited 7 years before he could have family join him.


37 posted on 11/23/2011 5:53:14 AM PST by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Sorry but after you wrote your own opinions into the body of an NRO story about Cain hoping to pass off you opinions as part of the story, you ended any credibility you might have as a Freeper

I'm amazed that you still have the arrogance to show your face around here after that shameful, childish act.

38 posted on 11/23/2011 5:53:16 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibsRJerks

That’s exactly why the so called ‘compassionate conservatives ‘ named Newt, Romney and Perry can shove it.


39 posted on 11/23/2011 5:54:05 AM PST by rintense (ABO is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

So Newt has begged the illegal immigration question and muddied the truth. No, he has done way more than that. he just disqualified himself for the nomination. He just undid all the slow progress he has made since he was written off as a factor last summer.

I’m going to quote what dirtboy said about it in another thread, and leave it there.

“This one sentence shows all that is wrong with the Beltway types.

OK, Ginrich is willing to ‘take the heat’ - but what does that mean?

Wow, he might not get the nomination. Big whup. He goes back to raking in the bucks from his Beltway influence peddling - which also gives him the money to be insulated from the consequences of this country pandering to illegals.

He makes enough money to live in a gated community.

He can go to a high-end hospital not overwhelmed by treating illegals, as mandated by the fedgov (all in the name of humanity, mind you).

And he makes enough to where taxes needed to pay for welfare and bennies for illegals don’t take a big proportional bite out of his paycheck.

So in other words, he is oblivious to the impact that his perceived ‘humanity’ has on working stiffs.

And that is EXACTLY what is wrong with him as GOP nominee.”


40 posted on 11/23/2011 5:54:35 AM PST by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: presently no screen name

Agree with you 100%. Deportation of folks who committed a single misdemeanor (yes, according to code, it’s about the same crime as a speeding ticket) years ago but who have been productive folks since then will not be deported REGARDLESS of who is President.

I could see the case for making it a felony, but it’s simply not. So it is what it is. And I like living in reality. And other reality is, the logisitics of doing so would far outweigh the benefits.

Seal the border. Kick out those arrested for drug, traffic, other crimes. Stop the hand outs. Do that, and the problem is mostly solved.

But mass deport? Really?
Bachmann won’t. Cain won’t. Mitt won’t. Just won’t happen. Newt should have said that, but he didn’t and he will pay some kind of price for it. Anyone who says otherwise is ignoring reality.


42 posted on 11/23/2011 5:55:13 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
And yet, for all his mistakes, Newt remains startlingly unembarrassed, which makes those mistakes even less palatable.

Newt has that trait in common with his old political sparring partner -- Bill Clinton. Drove me crazy when Clinton just blithely went forward, but it made his supporters love him all the more.

43 posted on 11/23/2011 5:56:12 AM PST by Tallguy (You can safely ignore anything that precedes the word "But"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

Yeah, I guess. As much as I abhor this development with Newt, there is no perfect candidate. We just better accept this fact to be true about each one of these Republican candidates.

Newt could also just be plainly playing politics to garner some portion of the hispanic vote.


44 posted on 11/23/2011 5:56:16 AM PST by LibsRJerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Just to be safe, we better elect as many Tea Partiers as possible to Congress.


45 posted on 11/23/2011 5:56:34 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: y6162

Thanks for rescuing MNJohnnie from breaking the rules, however; in the picture you posted, those two cancel each other out.


46 posted on 11/23/2011 5:57:15 AM PST by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Wow. Bravo!

Spot.

On.

47 posted on 11/23/2011 5:58:59 AM PST by SW6906 (6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: y6162

Yowza!


48 posted on 11/23/2011 5:59:41 AM PST by Huck (LIBERTY is the object.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Newt destroyed himself last night!

No different than Perry's “heartless” definition of Conservatives who want to protect the sovereignty of our Country and enforce the Law.

49 posted on 11/23/2011 5:59:46 AM PST by not2worry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson