Agree. The lack of perspective in this whole sordid affair is painfully evident. Poor kids. I hope they find peace.
Reading the article, it can be that hard for anyone to figure out who the kid is...Shouldn’t the Times be more concerned about protecting the victims?
I’m coming to this a little late, but just found this thread.
From the article:
“Amendola said Sandusky once spent a night alone in a hotel room with the boy during a trip sponsored by Second Mile. But he insisted he had paid for a pull-out cot in the hotel room, and that he had turned over receipts to investigators to prove it.”
A receipt does not prove that Sandusky didn’t molest the boy, it only shows that he was smart enough to cover his tracks. Victim #1 is one of the later victims, but the first to step forward since the 1998 incident (which didn’t lead to any charges). Sandusky knew that others were on to his wicked deeds, so he KNEW he had to provide a cover for himself.