Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich Gave Push to Clients, Not Just Ideas
New York Times ^ | November 29, 2011 | MIKE McINTIRE and JIM RUTENBERG

Posted on 11/30/2011 3:10:53 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

Newt Gingrich is adamant that he is not a lobbyist, but rather a visionary who traffics in ideas, not influence. But in the eight years since he started his health care consultancy, he has made millions of dollars while helping companies promote their services and gain access to state and federal officials.

In a variety of instances, documents and interviews show, Mr. Gingrich arranged meetings between executives and officials, and salted his presentations to lawmakers with pitches for his clients, who pay as much as $200,000 a year to belong to his Center for Health Transformation.

When the center sponsored a “health transformation summit” at the Florida State Capitol in March 2006, lawmakers who attended Mr. Gingrich’s keynote speech inside the House chamber received a booklet promoting not just ideas but also the specific services of two dozen of his clients. Executives from some of those companies sat on panels for discussions that lawmakers were encouraged to attend after Mr. Gingrich’s address.

Gerard White, president of Clearwave, which paid about $50,000 to become a center member, used the occasion to pitch his company’s system for managing patient medical data. “It was a way for companies who were part of Newt’s group to say to health officials in Florida, ‘Hey, here are some exciting things we’re doing,’ ” Mr. White said.

Mr. Gingrich and his aides have repeatedly emphasized that he is not a registered lobbyist, an important distinction in their effort to position him as an outsider who will transform the ways of Washington. They say that he has never taken a position for money and that corporations have signed on with him because of the strength of his ideas.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservatism; gingrich2012; morals; values
Are Conservatives Ready to Forgive Newt Gingrich His Sins? ………..”If Newt can withstand the rehashing of Tom Coburn’s book — a book that portrays Gingrich as talking the talk, but betraying the talk once in office — we may have our anti-Romney. If not, I think Rick Perry may yet have a second coming if he is ready. I say that having asked many callers to my radio show who are Cain supporters where they would go. Most say Newt. The others Perry. And if Newt implodes? They almost always say they’d go to Perry — Romney is rarely their choice.”…….
1 posted on 11/30/2011 3:11:01 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All; shield
Cain's backers warily consider Gingrich...."But an indication of discomfort in some quarters over Gingrich's rise came Tuesday when a new attack on the former House speaker surfaced online from a group calling itself Iowans for Christian Leaders in Government.

...."Newt is famous for being all over the board," Cary Gordon, an influential pastor from Sioux City, Iowa, told the Des Moines Register. "He is admirable in many ways, but I won't back him. I don't trust him."....

Iowans for Christian Leaders in Government Put Presser on Vander Plaats

......." YOU AND MR. GINGRICH SHARE A MUTUAL FRIEND IN JIM NUSSLE

In 2006, Mr. Nussle ran for Governor and asked that you serve as his running mate; an offer your willfully accepted.

In the nineties, Mr. Nussle’s current wife was working for Mr. Gingrich; while Mr. Gingrich’s current wife was working for a committee which Mr. Nussle served on in the House of Representatives.

Furthermore, both men were married when they began affairs with each other’s staff members – all while Mr. Gingrich was leading the investigation into Bill Clinton’s extramarital affair with Monica Lewinsky. This is an unfortunate irony.

More importantly, it points to a willful disregard of personal behavior and you are forever linked to both of these candidates in a way that is unacceptable for many of us who demand Christian leadership.

Which brings us to our next concern."..............

2 posted on 11/30/2011 3:14:17 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Power and soul struggle: Vander Plaats Says He's Still Searching for Clarity (Iowa FAMiLY leader endorsement angst) …………..”Sources familiar with the meetings at Walnut Creek Church have indicated that the goal of the meeting is to come to a conclusion as to which candidate social conservatives should rally behind. In the first meeting there was no consensus, but when they met for a second time, a new candidate rating system was unveiled. What TheIowaRepublican.com was told is that Bachmann received the highest ranking with 36 points, followed by Santorum with 35.5, Perry with 34, and Gingrich with 31.5.

It’s unknown who created the criteria and what it all entails, but the meeting has a large contingent of Bachmann supporters. The reason why this is important is because TheIowaRepublican.com was told that this group has been charged with making a recommendation to the FAMiLY Leader’s board before they decide on who they will endorse. When asked why his board of directors cannot make a decision on their own, Vander Plaats admitted that the board will seek the input of others, and added that, “Wisdom comes in a multitude of counsel.”

Since showering praise on Gingrich in an interview with the Des Moines Register following the forum, social conservatives leaders around the state have been grumbling about what they think is a likelihood that Vander Plaats may endorse Gingrich.

Yesterday, an anonymous letter from a group called Iowans for Christian Leaders in Government distributed an open letter that they had sent Vander Plaats warning him about the negative ramifications that endorsing Gingrich would bring. The letter stated that Vander Plaats’ endorsement “may be guided, not by prayer and conviction, but by personal benefit and prior relationships.”

Vander Plaats traveled the state in 2008 to advocate on behalf Gingrich’s American Solutions. Gingrich also provided financial support to Vander Plaats’ effort to defeat three Iowa Supreme Court justices last fall. Vander Plaats also received financial support from the American Family Association and worked with Wayne Hamilton, a key Perry aide. …………

While Vander Plaats and the FAMiLY Leader are still searching for clarity, there is one thing he was very clear about. The process is more difficult because their goal is not to just find a candidate who can beat President Obama next fall, but this candidate also needs to be able to beat Mitt Romney.

The only question for Vander Plaats and the FAMiLY Leader is, what kind of candidate will best accomplish that goal? A surefire conservative whose core convictions match theirs, or a candidate who already has momentum or has the connections that may pay dividends down the road?”

3 posted on 11/30/2011 3:14:48 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Bull, newt was lobbying by a different name just like his amnesty by a different name. The slug got kicked out of congress because he thought the rules did not apply to him. He still thinks the rules do not apply to him.


4 posted on 11/30/2011 3:18:16 AM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Newt, Willard, Perry and his fellow supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
What TheIowaRepublican.com was told is that Bachmann received the highest ranking with 36 points, followed by Santorum with 35.5, Perry with 34, and Gingrich with 31.5.

That's my top four right there, but not in that order. One has to factor in electability, power of ideas, oratory, past history, and statesmanship.

5 posted on 11/30/2011 3:20:23 AM PST by ez ("Abashed the Devil stood and felt how awful goodness is." - Milton, "Paradise Lost")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

NO Newt!

No independents or swing voters will vote for him. He is a guaranteed loser.


6 posted on 11/30/2011 3:21:59 AM PST by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Come on, Newt’s a healthcare genius. His ideas are gold. It has nothing to do with his access and influence in D.C.


7 posted on 11/30/2011 3:28:52 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

“.....lawmakers who attended Mr. Gingrich’s keynote speech inside the House chamber received a booklet promoting not just ideas but also the specific services of two dozen of his clients.”

Gee...you mean people actually paid for this? And geee you mean Newt made money doing this? My gosh, the shame of it all....

I’ll bet a week’s wages that this dumb think piece, probably put together by Romney’s people...will be on the side bar before you can say “colonscopy”.....


8 posted on 11/30/2011 3:47:41 AM PST by nikos1121 (Stand up is hard if you're not funny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

I know what you mean. Newt is a genius just like Obama. We have to keep being told how smart they are because it’s so hard to tell by what they do.


9 posted on 11/30/2011 4:01:12 AM PST by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2

Honestly, I don’t fault any of them. They know how the system works and have played it to the hilt to gain enormous wealth and power. It’s the way it’s designed to work, and they work it. Just don’t piss on my leg and tell me it’s raining.


10 posted on 11/30/2011 4:17:36 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2
Charlie Crist was Governor at the time Newt made his pitch here in Florida.

Now he's chasing ambulances with Morgan and Morgan, but I'm sure Newt made this venue in 2006 attractive to Charlie to arrange for Florida politico big wigs to be at Newt's disposal.

RINOS flocking together for their own personal gain in God's Waiting Room - one of the biggest population in need of Newt's magical mystery tour.

11 posted on 11/30/2011 4:21:55 AM PST by not2worry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

I do fault them for playing the system. The system is the same as the evil system we fought wars to rid ourselves of. Washington and many of the other founding fathers refused to play the system and chose personal loss in order to give us this nation. Many of the politicians we have now aren’t sons of liberty, they are illegitimate children that should be sent home to their whore mothers.


12 posted on 11/30/2011 4:22:29 AM PST by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2
Rick Perry on Congressional Insider Trading [:24]

******************

Nov. 13, 2011: “Pelosi fires back at ‘60 Minutes’ report on ‘soft corruption’”

“Pelosi and her husband participated in an initial public offering of Visa in 2008, according to CBS. They bought 5,000 shares at the initial price of $44; two days later, shares were trading at $64, CBS said.”.......... Source

Pelosi Bashes Catholics: 'They Have This Conscience Thing'... “After having some of her behind the scenes shenanigans exposed, Nancy Pelosi has turned to her friends in the MSM to help her with damage control. The effect is something akin to watching what scrambles out after you overturn a large rock.

Pelosi sought to defend herself from allegations that she and her husband made millions from insider trading in what the Washington Post calls a wide ranging interview……..

……Pelosi added a startling, if inadvertent, admission. Addressing the effects such [ObamaCare] legislation would have on Catholic health care providers, Pelosi said:

"I'm a devout Catholic and I honor my faith and love it . . . but they have this conscience thing."…….

13 posted on 11/30/2011 4:32:38 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

WWW.RICKPERRY.ORG

November 16, 2011

Dear Leader Pelosi,

After reading about House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer’s outburst over my “Overhauling Washington” plan, I wonder if his obstructionism reflects your own opposition and that of the Democratic Caucus to urgent reforms the American people so vehemently demand.

After increasing the debt by $4 trillion in less than three years, no one can believe that Americans are satisfied with business as usual, and that a permanent political class in Washington can get us out of the mess you and your colleagues have created.

A part-time Congress with half the pay would still make $38,000 a year more than the average American family. Do you truly oppose lawmakers spending more time in their districts? Is it so important for the Washington power brokers to build their fiefdoms of influence, including providing bailouts to Wall Street while businesses on Main Street are being boarded up every day?

Here is the fundamental question: do you believe Washington is broken? Before answering that question, consider these facts:

1) the Washington Metro area is now the most affluent metropolitan area in the country because lobbyists, contractors, elected officials and bureaucrats have been insulated from the economic ruin prevalent in the private sector;
2) Congressional office budgets have doubled since 2000 while employers all across America are laying off workers;
3) Our nation’s total debt is nearing the size of our nation’s economy, increasing our dependence on competitors like China;
4) The number of Americans out of work has increased by more than two million since January 2009, despite the massive stimulus package Democratic leaders promised would revive the economy, and;
5) on top of the job-killing spending policies of the previous Congress, employers are faced with a staggering $1.1 trillion in costs related to federal regulatory compliance.

Do you truly believe the answer to massive debt, over-regulation and bloated big-government policies is to continue to protect the status quo, which enriches and empowers Washington insiders at the expense of the American People?

My plan would overhaul Washington, eliminating certain agencies and reducing the size and scope of others. It will force Congress to make the tough decisions to balance the budget or require a further reduction in their pay. It would end lifetime appointments to future appointees to the federal bench. I don’t want to tinker around the edges when the American People demand a complete overhaul of Washington.

Let me conclude with an invitation: I am in Washington Monday and would love to engage you in a public debate about my Overhaul Washington plan versus the congressional status quo. I think it would be a tremendous service to the American public to see a public airing of these differences. Let the people decide. If Monday doesn’t work, perhaps we could find a time in Iowa over the course of the next month to discuss these issues in front of the people of America’s heartland.

Should you choose not to respond or engage in such a healthy discussion, I will take it to mean you will continue your obstructionist ways in the face of much needed Washington reform.

Sincerely,

Rick Perry
Governor of Texas


14 posted on 11/30/2011 4:33:27 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2

Maybe I’m too cynical, but I think human nature is human nature. Founding Fathers included. Yes, they risked a lot, but only to put themselves in place to benefit. None of this is new. It goes back as long as human history. Governments are nothing more than wealth engines designed to benefit those who run them.


15 posted on 11/30/2011 4:35:07 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
and Dodd and Barney Frank get a complete pass

.

16 posted on 11/30/2011 4:40:07 AM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Ted Kennedy's "Health Care Consultancy" is called Marwood (named after a Kennedy family house in Maryland.

Shockingly, the Consultancy's main activity appears to be running the family's private hedge-fund-of-funds.

In a year which should be about "throwing out the bums", how come we end up with one of the most inside-the-beltway candidates ever? Gingrich is 20% conservative, 80% Ted Kennedy's not-so-evil twin.

17 posted on 11/30/2011 4:41:09 AM PST by Vide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The divorce rate for Christians is HIGHER than the general population.


18 posted on 11/30/2011 4:57:57 AM PST by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Newt is not lobbyist. He merely took money in exchange of assuring conservatives about the merits of Fannie Mae and individual mandate in health care law.


19 posted on 11/30/2011 5:01:35 AM PST by heiss (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faucetman
The divorce rate for Christians is HIGHER than the general population.

Now that's an interesting claim. I'd like to see the study. Many people don't get married (just say they're engaged or baby-daddies), aren't really opposite sex to get married, and then of course there are those arranged marriages. It's a mixed bag. I'd like to see how that study was done. If you would provide the source. Thank you.

Of course the Newt marriages involved infidelity stints too. But now all should be forgiven because he's a grandfather and his daughters are campaigning with him and Callista. It's amazing how things just fly out the window on claims made by Newt that he is a master debater with ideas. This man's moral foundation is flawed and everything he's built on it is too.

20 posted on 11/30/2011 5:06:33 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; RoosterRedux; jonrick46; deepbluesea; RockinRight; TexMom7; potlatch; ...
Perry Ping....

IF you'd rather NOT be pinged FReepmail me.

IF you'd like to be added FReepmail me. Thanks.

*****************************************************************************************************************************************************


21 posted on 11/30/2011 5:39:42 AM PST by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

LOL Gotta love this.

“Push.” LOL

The NY Times is desperate. They should just go back to the “divorced cancer stricken wife” meme. What a joke!


22 posted on 11/30/2011 7:00:55 AM PST by TitansAFC (Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry are not your enemies, my fellow Freepers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Forget it this dog is just not going to hunt. Nobody believes or probably even cares about this non scandal which is why try as they may the MSM and the Perrybots cannot get any traction on this subject.


23 posted on 11/30/2011 7:18:28 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

LOL, no one has cast the first vote yet.


24 posted on 11/30/2011 8:10:11 AM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Newt, Willard, Perry and his fellow supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2

http://www.amazon.com/George-Washingtons-Expense-Account-Washington/dp/0802137733


25 posted on 11/30/2011 2:35:42 PM PST by Kenny Bunk (So, you're telling me Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts can't figure out this eligibility stuff?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Maybe I’m too cynical, but I think human nature is human nature. Founding Fathers included. Yes, they risked a lot, but only to put themselves in place to benefit.

It’s not true of everyone. Many including some of the founding fathers made decisions that they knew would cause themselves harm.

If governments are nothing more than wealth engines for the people that run them, then the commoners are fools to cooperate.


26 posted on 11/30/2011 4:10:34 PM PST by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Maybe I’m too cynical, but I think human nature is human nature. Founding Fathers included. Yes, they risked a lot, but only to put themselves in place to benefit.

It’s not true of everyone. Many including some of the founding fathers made decisions that they knew would cause themselves harm.

If governments are nothing more than wealth engines for the people that run them, then the commoners are fools to cooperate.


27 posted on 11/30/2011 4:10:45 PM PST by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson