Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chicago school bans some lunches brought from home
The Chicago Tribune ^ | April 11, 2011 | Monica Eng and Joel Hood

Posted on 11/30/2011 5:29:41 AM PST by Clintonfatigued

At his public school, Little Village Academy on Chicago's West Side, students are not allowed to pack lunches from home. Unless they have a medical excuse, they must eat the food served in the cafeteria.

Principal Elsa Carmona said her intention is to protect students from their own unhealthful food choices.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: arth; chicago; food; homeschooling; homeschoolyourkids; liberalnonsense; nannystate; publicschools; schoollunch; totalitarian; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

1 posted on 11/30/2011 5:29:45 AM PST by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

The Lunch Police


2 posted on 11/30/2011 5:30:59 AM PST by Mustang Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom; wintertime; rabscuttle385; bamahead

Boy, it’s sure a good thing that the government school is teaching the students they need protection from themselves and from making their own choices!


3 posted on 11/30/2011 5:31:10 AM PST by Clintonfatigued (Illegal aliens collect welfare checks that Americans won't collect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Facists!


4 posted on 11/30/2011 5:31:59 AM PST by jimfree (In Nov 2012 Herman Cain will have more relevant and quality executive experience than Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Principal Elsa Carmona said her intention is to protect students from their own unhealthful food choices.

In other words, protect the children from their parents.
5 posted on 11/30/2011 5:32:12 AM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Simple, the government shouldn’t be supplying food at all.


6 posted on 11/30/2011 5:32:16 AM PST by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Its Illinois of course.


7 posted on 11/30/2011 5:33:17 AM PST by Eye of Unk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

“”Who thinks the lunch is not good enough?” the seventh-grader shouted to his lunch mates in Spanish and English.

Any school that bans homemade lunches also puts more money in the pockets of the district’s food provider, Chartwells-Thompson.

The federal government pays the district for each free or reduced-price lunch taken, and the caterer receives a set fee from the district per lunch.

During a recent visit to the school, dozens of students took the lunch but threw most of it in the garbage uneaten.”


8 posted on 11/30/2011 5:35:24 AM PST by wolficatZ (Somebody once wrote "Revenge is a dish that has to be eaten cold".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

From the article:

“Any school that bans homemade lunches also puts more money in the pockets of the district’s food provider, Chartwells-Thompson. The federal government pays the district for each free or reduced-price lunch taken, and the caterer receives a set fee from the district per lunch.”

That’s what it’s really all about, the Federal goody, taxpayer-and-Chinese money. It always, always, is.


9 posted on 11/30/2011 5:35:52 AM PST by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
"In other words, protect the children from their parents."

...and save the lunch lady's union job. A TWOFER!

10 posted on 11/30/2011 5:37:15 AM PST by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wolficatZ

Awww, you beat me to the money quote by 28 seconds!


11 posted on 11/30/2011 5:37:34 AM PST by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

This is concerning and just plain wrong on so many levels. Parents are the ones who should decide what their child eats. NOT the school. Whether the majority of the kids receive free lunches or not, the school is mandating that something be purchased. Another school was mentioned in the article that allows food from home but they confiscate (i.e. steal) what they determine to be unhealthy. Some of the children are exempt with a doctor’s note. A DOCTOR’S NOTE? This is beyond ridiculous. It is absolute control over the parents right to nourish their children.


12 posted on 11/30/2011 5:39:20 AM PST by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Tell me Jose, what does it say when Msssss Carmona thinks your parents are too stupid to pack a healthy lunch for you?

Anyone got a picture of the slim and trim Mssss Carmona?


13 posted on 11/30/2011 5:41:24 AM PST by silverleaf (common sense is not so common- voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
If their children do not qualify for free or reduced-price meals, such a policy would require them to pay $2.25 a day for food they don't necessarily like.

This has got to be a financial hardship for some families, especially those with more than one child. Unbelievable policy.

14 posted on 11/30/2011 5:41:40 AM PST by McLynnan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235

LOL, at least we read the article, which most here don’t before commenting.


15 posted on 11/30/2011 5:41:44 AM PST by wolficatZ (Somebody once wrote "Revenge is a dish that has to be eaten cold".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS = CHILD ABUSE!!


16 posted on 11/30/2011 5:42:50 AM PST by Coldwater Creek (He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High will rest in the shadow of the Almighty Psalm 91:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; albertp; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; ...
Principal Elsa Carmona said her intention is to protect students from their own unhealthful food choices.



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!

17 posted on 11/30/2011 5:45:14 AM PST by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

I think somebody might want to check Principal Elsa Carmona’s bank account. Wouldn’t surprise me at all if there’s a recent spike in the deposit column. Maybe a trip to the Caymans in her future?


18 posted on 11/30/2011 5:45:41 AM PST by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wolficatZ

The thing that got me was that I don’t think I saw a single student name that wasn’t latino. I may have to go back and check the article again, but I only recall Ruiz, Gutierrez, etc. I don’t know enough about Chicago to know if this is a school populated almost entirely by hispanics, or if they’re the only ones that were involved in the article.


19 posted on 11/30/2011 5:45:57 AM PST by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
Not a full body shot but........


20 posted on 11/30/2011 5:46:23 AM PST by liberalh8ter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson