Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity: Did anyone catch Newt on Hannity last nite?

Posted on 12/01/2011 10:17:53 AM PST by Maceman

I don't have time to write about my reaction, but I would be interested in the perspective of my fellow Freepers.

Personally, I thought Newt was VERY impressive, and for a whole hour.

I still haven't decided whom to support (not that it matters, since the Massachusetts primary is not going be a game changer anyway).

I have been in Cain's camp, but I am reassessing in light of what I perceive as the Cain team's mis-management of the whole sex attack thing.

Also, rightly or wrongly, unless Cain manages to win a very sympathetic public vindication in a very short time I am seriously doubting his ability to continue in this race.

I'm sad about that. But I was greatly impressed by Newt last nite for a lot of reasons I don't have time to get into just now.

What did alla y'alls think?


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2012; elections; gingrich; newt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-98 last
To: JohnKinAK

Newt recommended Toffler’s book because it is a warning of what can go wrong.

The Tofflers are ‘futurists’.

Your post is dishonest - you are implying that Newt Gingrich is advocating the abominable. Shameful.


51 posted on 12/01/2011 12:13:31 PM PST by sodpoodle ( Newter the Democrats - top to bottom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpX06eAm4sw

Hannity’s interview of Gingrich, 11/30/11


52 posted on 12/01/2011 12:14:42 PM PST by Lady Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

Exactly why I hate ‘lists’ like this. Overwhelm your opponents with BS they won’t/can’t take the time to respond to.

Like I said...lazy.


53 posted on 12/01/2011 12:20:07 PM PST by Raebie (WS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

The Gingrich interview was full of ideas, not platitudes and evasions.

High points: he’d dismantle Obama’s govt, starting on day one, on hour one the “czars” would be gone. Our embassy in Israel would be moved from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

He will humiliate and demolish Obama in the campaign. His slogan, Hannity asked? “Can you take four more years of this?”

Also, Gingrich knows his way around Congress blindfolded. That’s going to be helpful even if it’s a Republican Congress and Senate.


54 posted on 12/01/2011 12:20:58 PM PST by Lady Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnKinAK; Windflier
How bout this instead:

You actually respond to the question posted at the beginning of the thread instead of spamming it like all the other threads you've posted this same list to.

I didn't see his appearance and would love to see a conversation amongst those who did rather than some troll's attempt at thread hijacking. Because believe it or not, we're not stupid...we got it the first time you posted it.

Between you and Windflier's acting as a nattering naybob of negativity...sheesh 53 posts and still little commentary about what was ACTUALLY SAID.

Thanks for the hijack, boys...

55 posted on 12/01/2011 12:23:04 PM PST by Axeslinger (Where has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Lady Lucky

Thank you for offering insight into the actual subject at hand.


56 posted on 12/01/2011 12:25:40 PM PST by Axeslinger (Where has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Axeslinger
Windflier's acting as a nattering naybob of negativity...

Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't see your forum rules posted.

It's an open forum, friend. People are going to comment on the subject matter of any thread in whatever way suits them.

57 posted on 12/01/2011 12:33:46 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Having re-read your comment that anyone whose beliefs “go back to Plato” is blackened with the irremovable taint of the dreaded “elitism”, I stand by my statement.


58 posted on 12/01/2011 12:35:23 PM PST by Notary Sojac (Gingrich/Cain 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkaKwJ9eOUU

Gingrich defends Palin, drops a whole house of Palin approval on msnbc reporter.


59 posted on 12/01/2011 12:37:55 PM PST by Lady Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

traitor!!!!

/s


60 posted on 12/01/2011 12:38:41 PM PST by wardaddy (Michelle, Sarah, Perry now Newt over Mitt.....that is how I've seen it and it's where we are)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

“A Nation Like No Other: Why American Exceptionalism Matters” by Newt Gingrich is available at amazon. http://www.amazon.com/Nation-Like-No-Other-Exceptionalism/dp/B005DI8LIW


61 posted on 12/01/2011 12:43:23 PM PST by Lady Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greenhornet68
New rule...never take a picture with a Democrat


62 posted on 12/01/2011 12:43:54 PM PST by wardaddy (Michelle, Sarah, Perry now Newt over Mitt.....that is how I've seen it and it's where we are)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac
Having re-read your comment that anyone whose beliefs “go back to Plato” is blackened with the irremovable taint of the dreaded “elitism”, I stand by my statement.

You speak well, but your analyzer seems to be malfunctioning. Let me simplify it for you.

What I said, is that you have poorly formed opinions/observations of those who strongly support politicians like Angle, O'Donnell, Cain, and Palin.

You've obviously not comprehended the basic reasons that patriotic conservatives are drawn to these people.

63 posted on 12/01/2011 12:45:34 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: JohnKinAK

Some of the points you posted were also mentioned by Michelle Malkin on this morning’s Fox & Friends show.


64 posted on 12/01/2011 12:48:28 PM PST by 4integrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnKinAK

Thanks for posting this:
.

Know them by their Fruit

Some of Newt’s Progressive Dossier:

04/02/1987 – He cosponsored the 1987 Fairness Doctrine
10/22/1991 – He voted for an amendment that would create a National Police Corps.
03/–/1993 – He Voted for sending $1.6 Billion in foreign aid to Russia.
11/19/1993 – He voted for the NAFTA Implementation Act.
11/27/1994 – He supported the GATT Treaty subjecting US Sovereignty to the WTO
08/27/1995 – He suggests that drug smuggling should carry a death sentence.
04/25/1996 – Voted for the single largest increase on Federal education spending ($3.5 Billion)
04/10/1995 – He supported Federal tax dollars being spent on abortions.
06/01/1996 – He helped a Democrat switch parties in an attempt to defeat Ron Paul in the 1996 election.
09/25/1996 – Introduced H.R. 4170, demanded life-sentence or execution for someone bringing 2 ounces of marijuana across the border.
01/22/1997 – Congress gave him a record-setting $300,000 fine for ethical wrongdoing.
11/29/2006 – He said that free speech should be curtailed in order to fight terrorism. Wants to stop terrorists from using the internet. Called for a “serious debate about the 1st Amendment.”
11/29/2006 – He called for a “Geneva Convention for terrorists” so it would be clear who the Constitution need not apply to.
02/15/2007 – He supported Bush’s proposal for mandatory carbon caps.
09/28/2008 – Says if he were in office, he would have reluctantly voted for the $700B TARP bailout.
10/01/2008 – Says in an article that TARP was a “workout, not a bailout.”
12/08/2008 – He was paid $300,000 by Freddie Mac to halt Congress from bringing necessary reform.
03/31/2009 – Says we should have Singapore-style drug tests for Americans.
07/30/2010 – Says that Iraq was just step one in defeating the “Axis of Evil”.
08/03/2010 – Advocates attacks on Iran & North Korea.
08/16/2010 – Opposes property rights of the mosque owner in NYC.
11/15/2010 – He defended Romneycare
12/05/2010 – He said that a website owner should be considered an enemy combatant, hunted down and executed, for publishing leaked government memos.
01/30/2011 – He lobbied for ethanol subsidies.
01/30/2011 – He suggested that flex-fuel vehicles be mandated for Americans.
02/13/2011 – He criticized Obama for sending less U.S. taxdollars to Egypt.
02/15/2011 – His book said that he believes man-made climate-change and advocated creating “a new endowment for conservation and the environment.”
03/09/2011 – He blames his infidelity to multiple wives on his passion for the country.
03/15/2011 – Says that NAFTA worked because it created jobs in Mexico.
03/19/2011 – He has no regrets about supporting Medicare drug coverage. (Now $7.2T unfunded liability)
03/23/2011 – He completely flip-flopped on Libyan intervention in 16 days.
03/25/2011 – He plans to sign as many as 200 executive orders on his first day as president.
04/25/2011 – He’s a paid lobbyist for Federal ethanol subsidies.
05/12/2011 – He was more supportive of individual health-care mandates than Mitt Romney.
08/01/2011 – He hired a company to create fake Twitter to appear as if he had a following.
10/07/2011 – He said he’d ignore the Supreme Court if need be.
11/16/2011 – Was revealed he actually received 1.6 million from Freddie Mac, vs. his previously stated $300,000-

2009-2010 Travels around the country with Al Sharpton and Arne Duncan to promote President Obama’s new educational policies: i.e. increased local control of schools with increased Federal subsidies and regulations from Washington.

2010 Supported ultra-liberal, pro-abortion, pro-union, establishment candidate Dede Scozzafava in New York’s 23rd Congressional District in a special election, over conservative candidate Doug Hoffman.

1995 Gingrich Wrote the foreword to Alvin Toffler’s book, “The Politics of the Third Wave, Creating a New Civilization” and advocated all members of Congress should read the book. The book calls for a “New Democracy” for the 21st century which is essentially based on following Plato’s Third Wave virtues:
1. Private property must be abolished, the wealthy hated and their wealth redistributed by state mandate.
2. Children belong to, and are born to serve the state. The influence of parents is noxious and disruptive to the interest of the state, thus every child should be raised in government nurseries, without knowledge of who his or her parents are and without the parents having knowledge of who their offspring are. Every child becomes the common property of every parent in the city. Every parent has the collective duty to watch over them.
3. Private education, like traditional parenting, is at the very headwaters of falsehood and social strife. It must be eliminated and replaced with a closely monitored state school system.
4. Old values passed down in history, song, children’s books, all need to be rewritten to discredit and erase the old virtues and to exalt and enthrone the new.
5. Frivolous children’s games eliminated, new games developed that emphasize law and order.
6. Private industry is self serving. State should have absolute control of all industry for benefit of the whole.
7. Class mobility is a revolutionary idea that threatens the stability of the state and the pre-eminence of true philosophy. A strict caste system and the elimination of career choice is the answer.
8. Talent must never be allowed to wander or be wasted. Early on, children must be identified and channeled by the state for the benefit of the state into careers selected by the state.
9. Under the guise of equality, women ought to be exploited: first to foment ‘class war’ during the Third Wave (women’s roles are reversed to men’s); next, to be promptly put into their place as part of a ‘community of women’ to be shared collectively by male guardians.
10. Selective breeding is beneficial to the state.
11. Unwanted babies, inferior babies, deformed babies, and the adult handicapped are an unnecessary drag on the prosperity and well-being of society. They should be left to die. Unproductive adults, likewise, should be terminated.
12. Homosexuality is morally acceptable and homosexual rape of lower-class males and boys is a right of rulers, guardians and war heroes.
13. Only a few men are foreordained to understand life and higher good… the rest are equivalent of dumb sheep.
14. Absolute loyalty to the government is vital for the success and safety of society. A state sanctioned National Police network is an essential good.
15. Wealth is not essential to the safety of the state.

- Gingrich voted to permit the Federal Reserve to purchase Treasury Debt
- Bailed out savings and loan institutions in 1991. $40B Bank bailout
- Gingrich voted to strengthen the federal home loan agencies
- Gingrich voted for increased powers to the FDIC to bail out struggling savings and loans through reorganization, purchase of bad assets, or recapitalization.
- Gingrich voted in favor of the Chrysler Bailout in 1979
- Gingrich voted for an oil windfall profits tax in 1979, which was signed by Jimmy Carter.
- Urged the House to repeal the War Powers Act and give the Presidency more power.
- Urged Clinton to expand military presence in Bosnia.
- Gingrich voted against a provision requiring congressional approval prior to deployment of U.S. troops into Central America in 1983.
- Gingrich voted to increase CIA secrecy and against any requirement that the President report covert activity to congress before it is initiated.
- Gingrich voted for Jimmy Carter’s “Energy Mobilization Board.”
- Gingrich voted for an increase in taxes on coal producers in 1981
- Gingrich voted for a 5-cent increase in the gas tax to fund highway and other mass-transit projects.
- Gingrich was one of the few who voted against the 1984 bill requiring the President and Congress to submit a balanced budget
- Gingrich voted for a congressional pay raise
- Gingrich voted against a bipartisan 1% cut to the Department of Defense budget for 1983


65 posted on 12/01/2011 12:52:21 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Isabel C.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpX06eAm4sw


66 posted on 12/01/2011 12:55:00 PM PST by Lady Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

I’m backing Newt at this point, I don’t care what these know them by thier fruit nutcases say, I liked Cain, but he’s done. The only other dark horse (who should really be the front runner) is Michelle Bachmann, I like her too, she is the only true conservative candidate in the race, the only true Tea Partier too, but look at her numbers, it shows the Tea Party movement is over.


67 posted on 12/01/2011 12:55:43 PM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac

What a drama queen! I just won’t vote for him. LOL


68 posted on 12/01/2011 12:58:07 PM PST by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: JohnKinAK

I think you would be astonished to see Reagan’s list, & yet he was one of the great president’s of all time. I think what many here are trying to say, myself included, is that we don’t care about the fumbles in the past as much as what will be done in the future.

Does Newt have a history of saying one thing, & then doing another? NO! He followed through w/ every single item in the Contract w/ America, he balanced the budget, reformed healthcare, etc.

Has he had some goofy, maybe even liberal ideas in the past? Sure. Has he changed his mind on some of those goofy ideas? Yes. As someone who has lived a long life, I can say many of my positions have changed over the years as well, especially as I’ve allowed religion & experience to become more a part of my life as Newt recently has.

So, if you’ve even read Newt’s 21st Century Contract w/ America, is there anything in there you disagree with, that you feel in not conservative? Newt has a history of following through w/ what he says he’s going to do. Sometimes that has been a bad thing, most of the time it’s been a good thing. Point is, if he follows through w/ what he’s said he’s going to do NOW, then we’re in much better shape than what we might be w/ some of the other candidates.

What other candidate has the history of creaming the Dems as he did in the early 90’s? Sure it didn’t last, but that’s largely due his own caucus getting limp in the wrist & Newt’s self admitted lack of experience in handling those issues. Newt now has that experience & has learned. Who else has that experience & has learned those lessons? We’re in a crisis now & can’t afford more on the job training.

We’re in a war w/ the left. Who else has a better record of beating the left? For that matter, who has ANY record of beating the left?

Is Newt a sure bet? Not even! Does he give us the best odds overall in turning this nation around? I think so.


69 posted on 12/01/2011 12:59:52 PM PST by Confab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

Newt is smart and talks a good game and he always has.

His rhetoric is conservative, his governing is moderate.

He is the typical establishment RINO, and there is a long history to prove that. I believe we elect Gingrich, we will be well on our way to a one world government - unless we also elect a very conservative Congress to combat him.

I was wooed by him too, until I did my homework. I found out why he is SO disliked in Georgia.

Cain he has an army of believers praying for him and supporting him (even some fasting and praying). I believe he still has a shot. A lot can happen between now and January.

I will never, ever vote for Gingrich or Romney.

Beating Obama means nothing if you put in someone who is going to continue the same direction.


70 posted on 12/01/2011 1:15:50 PM PST by justsaynomore (http://teamcain.hermancain.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Confab

>> “Does Newt have a history of saying one thing, & then doing another? NO! He followed through w/ every single item in the Contract w/ America, he balanced the budget, reformed healthcare, etc.” <<

.
First the “Contract with America” was no conservative accomplishment.

It was standard RINO establishment window dressing.

There was no balanced Budget - There was an illusion of balancing the budget, by keeping the debt service, which was close to equaling the entire rest of federal expenditures, out of the budget!

The entire debt service was paid with new debt.

>> “Does Newt have a history of saying one thing, & then doing another?” <<

.
Yes, definitely, every time his lips are moving.

>> “Has he had some goofy, maybe even liberal ideas in the past?” <<

Yes, every one of them.

>> “Has he changed his mind on some of those goofy ideas?” <<

Not a one. If he is elected we will become Europe - West.

There will be no chance of recovery if Noot becomes the nominee.


71 posted on 12/01/2011 1:19:31 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

>> “Newt recommended Toffler’s book because it is a warning of what can go wrong.” <<

.
No!

It is a roadmap of how to commit national suicide.

Futurists are anti-conservative lunatics.


72 posted on 12/01/2011 1:22:24 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: justsaynomore

>> “Beating Obama means nothing if you put in someone who is going to continue the same direction.” <<

.
Exactly!
.


73 posted on 12/01/2011 1:25:13 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Recommended reading is not advocating.

Weren’t you advised to read Marx or Hitler as a warning?


74 posted on 12/01/2011 1:27:09 PM PST by sodpoodle ( Newter the Democrats - top to bottom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Lady Lucky

Have you read it?

Do you agree with its premises?


75 posted on 12/01/2011 1:31:58 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

Wake up!

Noot wrote the foreward to the book, and absolutely agrees with all they advocate.


76 posted on 12/01/2011 1:33:40 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

No offense, but I stopped reading at “First the “Contract with America” was no conservative accomplishment.”


77 posted on 12/01/2011 1:36:56 PM PST by Confab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac
Rush had a good piece yesterday about "perfection".

He said that the framers of The Constitution were mindful of the fact that people are not perfect.

There will never be a perfect candidate or a perfect President.

Newt admits he has made mistakes but who has not?

Loved the idea of him following Zero around rebutting his comments and claims within hours.

78 posted on 12/01/2011 1:37:18 PM PST by Churchillspirit (9/11/01...NEVER FORGET.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

>> “I have been in Cain’s camp, but I am reassessing in light of what I perceive as the Cain team’s mis-management of the whole sex attack thing.” <<

.
Just how would you have handled such a false and criminal attack, with a complicit propaganda ministry carrying the ball for the libelists?
.


79 posted on 12/01/2011 1:37:55 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Yes, I saw the whole hour.

Newt was very impressive.

Would love to see him debate the kenyan.

80 posted on 12/01/2011 1:39:13 PM PST by Churchillspirit (9/11/01...NEVER FORGET.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady Lucky
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpX06eAm4sw

Hannity’s interview of Gingrich, 11/30/11

Thanks. That was great!

81 posted on 12/01/2011 1:40:40 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Confab

Because you have no idea what conservative means.

Clue: Opposite of Noot.


82 posted on 12/01/2011 1:49:06 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

To quote Newt Gingrich, US Speaker of the House of Representatives, “Alvin and Heidi Toffler have given us the key to viewing current disarray within the positive framework of a dynamic, exciting future... The Tofflers correctly understand the development and distribution of information that has become the central productivity and power activity of the human race.... In the Third Wave, the Tofflers moved from observation (found in earlier works such as Future Shock) to creating a predictive framework They placed the information revolution (from circa 1990) in an historical perspective, comparing it with the other two great transformations, the agricultural revolution (beginning 8000 B.C thru around 1700) the industrial revolution (beginning around 1700 and still spreading across world society in an ever slower movement) . According to the Tofflers, we are feeling the impact of the third great wave of change in history, and we are, as a result, in the process of creating a new civilization.” (Preface to Toffler’s Creating a New Civilization)

_____________________________________________________

Yes, I can see what you mean. He is promoting mass killings right there in that foreword. Sorry I was wrong.


83 posted on 12/01/2011 1:49:16 PM PST by sodpoodle ( Newter the Democrats - top to bottom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

Read the damn book and get the cobwebs out of your head.

Noot and the Tofflers are humanists.

They absolutely believe in the perfectibility of Man, not the total depravity of man as stated in God’s word.

New Age, get it?


84 posted on 12/01/2011 1:55:54 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Don’t use that tone with me.

Newt’s a Catholic.


85 posted on 12/01/2011 1:58:36 PM PST by sodpoodle ( Newter the Democrats - top to bottom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

I will not be voting for Newt in our primary.


86 posted on 12/01/2011 2:03:08 PM PST by Fledermaus (I'll vote for Mitt Romney when Hell freezes over. He's as bad or worse than Zero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Your tone seems to be more associated w/ the Liberal way of doing things than Conservative ones. They tend to scream a lot & call people names & such. That might explain a lot.


87 posted on 12/01/2011 2:05:58 PM PST by Confab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Confab

My tone is associated with disgust at those that push global socialist new agers off as patriotic conservatives.

You and Noot are left of liberal.

You openly post lies and fluff to promote the most insidious man to ever run as a Republican.

We’ve had enough of your hope and change. We need to roll back to sanity.


88 posted on 12/01/2011 2:12:44 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

Catholic is meaningless.

Catholic new agers are common. Christians are what is rare among RCs

Perhaps you’re one of the New Agers? - It’s the diametric opposite of conservative.


89 posted on 12/01/2011 2:16:55 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Just how would you have handled such a false and criminal attack, with a complicit propaganda ministry carrying the ball for the libelists?

Well, for one thing, I wouldn't have had my campaign manager out there speculating that Rick Perry's team was behind it without evidence, so I'd have to walk it back.

And I wouldn't have gone out and made a half-assed public response off the cuff within hours, so that I would appear to be embellishing or revising the story as I went along that evening. I would have waited a day at least until I had my team on the same page and my response well thought out.

And however little information I got from Politico ten days before publication, once I heard from them I would have done some scenario planning, thought long and hard about anything -- ANYTHING -- in my past that could be twisted into a sexual harassment claim, and would have begun to develop at least a rudimentary strategy for handling some type of impending crisis.

Cain's team was caught flat-footed with ten days notice that something related to his past encounters with women -- however misconstrued -- was going to be dropped.

During that time, his team could have at least began reaching out to people who could have vouched for Cain's character, and prepped them to be available.

That said, I believe Cain is innocent of these accusations. But I had expected that one of his core strengths would have been to assemble a team that could handle the kind of crises that politics produces. Certainly, he should have had some kind of rapid response function in place months before this whole thing erupted.

More recently, even his use of the word "reassess," and then subsequent retraction that he was in this race to stay, followed by his appearance on Cavuto where he really did appear to be unsure of whether or not he would end his campaign, has led me further to contemplate that he really has not put together a competent team. And that is a major disappointment.

90 posted on 12/01/2011 2:24:00 PM PST by Maceman (Obama: As American as nasei goreng)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Isabel C.
Know, eye mist it.

OMG! U R 2 funny!

91 posted on 12/01/2011 2:26:16 PM PST by Maceman (Obama: As American as nasei goreng)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

Like I thought, you’re an anti-Cain troll.

Amember of Perry’s campaign was totally behind it: Wilson.

His public response was honest and accurate, and appropriate.

There never was a sexual harrasment claim. Scenario planning is something a guilty party like Noot would have had to do.

There is no way that Cain could have handled it any more than Clarence Thomas could have. The mediots just lied, and morphed it whatever way they pleased as usual.


92 posted on 12/01/2011 2:58:53 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Like I thought, you’re an anti-Cain troll.

You couldn't be more wrong. I have been on the Cain train for a long time. In fact, back in May I actually contacted Cain's operatives in NH and Iowa to see whether I could offer my skills to the Cain campaign. (Unfortunately, the two that I spoke with left the campaign some time later.)

I just have not been impressed at the way Cain and his team have handled this. Maybe you disagree, which is your right. But you have no reason to call names, least of all a troll. You owe me an apology, which I won't hold my breath waiting for.

93 posted on 12/01/2011 3:35:13 PM PST by Maceman (Obama: As American as nasei goreng)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

Instead of holding your breath, do some thinking.

Cain’s accusers are so unbelievable to begin with, how can you lay blame on Cain?

Did you blame Clarence Thomas too?

This is about defending the Plantation, and they will do it to the death. We have to nominate Cain and let them self destruct in their madness, and they will.


94 posted on 12/01/2011 3:46:04 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Axeslinger

When the sayer is Newt, what he says is irrelevant. He is a skilled and glib liar that will gladly tell you what you want to hear.

You’re better off for not hearing it.


95 posted on 12/01/2011 3:50:05 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

So who’s your candidate?


96 posted on 12/01/2011 4:33:38 PM PST by Osage Orange (HE HATE ME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

Some of these newer sign ups trying to sow discontent are probably DUmmies. I know freepers troll the DU idiots at times(I admit Im a flamer over there its hilarious to tear down their liberal messiah), and Im sure the libtard imbeciles are here to try and say that all the GOP are unelectable so the default choice is Obama. Sorry doesnt work on me and hope it doesn’t work on most. Watch people post history folks, then you will know them by their fruits...Anyone at this point is better than Obama, anyone.


97 posted on 12/01/2011 11:57:08 PM PST by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

It wasn’t just a photo-op it was what he was saying about Climate Change. Everyone knows it is a SCAM.


98 posted on 12/02/2011 1:51:04 AM PST by greenhornet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-98 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson