Skip to comments.
Obama's Income Inequality Speech ("trickle down - It doesn’t work. It’s never worked.")
The Atlantic Wire ^
| 12/06/11
| Adam Clark Estes
Posted on 12/06/2011 2:00:46 PM PST by Libloather
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: Joan Kerrey
The way I do the math the other tax payers pay $100,000, not $$82,000. Other tax payers paid both the net pay and the benefits and the taxes. The government worker paid N O T H I N G.Correct, but remember if the gubment worker is paid $100K once you factor in his benefit package the administrative costs associated with his job (he needs to be supervised) and all the other incidentals the costs to the taxpayer is much higher.
Trying to solve a recession by expanding the government workforce always struck me as a starving man cutting off his foot and eating it, thinking he was filling his stomach.
To: Libloather
I hate Dems. Proven policies are said “not to work” while every single Dem policy that NEVER works is expanded.
I wish the “average” voter would wake the f%#$ up.
22
posted on
12/06/2011 3:55:10 PM PST
by
Fledermaus
(I'll vote for Mitt Romney when Hell freezes over. He's as bad or worse than Zero.)
To: Libloather
Remember that in those years, in 2001 and 2003, Congress passed two of the most expensive tax cuts for the wealthy in history, and what did they get us? The slowest job growth in half a century. Massive deficits It had to happen--Obama's level of lying BS has left me speechless.
23
posted on
12/06/2011 4:03:32 PM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(Obama: The stupid person`s idea of a smart person.)
To: Darkwolf377
nobama no longer leaves me speechless...I’m beyond that. He makes me vomit bile for hours.
24
posted on
12/06/2011 4:08:02 PM PST
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: Tenacious 1
Good explanation. I often site a much shorter version, something like, without profit, there is no business, without business there is no middle class, or any jobs for that matter.
25
posted on
12/06/2011 4:13:32 PM PST
by
gidget7
("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
To: hal ogen
Sadly, I don't think it is zero who is the putz, he knows exactly what he is doing, and doesn't believe a word of what he is saying. If he did, why would he have been involved in shady deals? His motives are much more nefarious. Something to ponder. No the true dolts, or idiots, are those who soak up his drivel and actually do believe it!
26
posted on
12/06/2011 4:17:47 PM PST
by
gidget7
("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
To: hal ogen
I just look at the words and think, “Is anybody really buying this total crap?” I can’t even come up with an argument—it’s beyond foolishness, it’s just...stupidity on parade, proudly trotted out.
27
posted on
12/06/2011 4:21:24 PM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(Obama: The stupid person`s idea of a smart person.)
To: YankeeReb
...thought I'd heard that on the radio while driving but I told myself I was mistaken.From the LA Times -
Well, it is great to be back in the state of Tex -- (laughter) -- state of Kansas. I was giving Bill Self a hard time, he was here a while back. As many of you know, I have roots here.
28
posted on
12/06/2011 5:03:08 PM PST
by
Libloather
(The epitome of civility.)
To: YankeeReb
Trying to solve a recession by expanding the government workforce always struck me as a starving man cutting off his foot and eating it, thinking he was filling his stomach. Good analogy. If you can dress the wounds and limit the blood loss, eating your toes and feet first would certainly provide life sustaining nourishment. Ironically, left alone, the starving body will consume itself much more efficiently starting with nonessential fat, then muscle, etc.
Point is the same.
29
posted on
12/07/2011 8:18:06 PM PST
by
Tenacious 1
(Government can only be a consumer of wealth, it can not create wealth.)
To: Libloather
[Theodore Roosevelt], declared in his 1910 ‘square deal’ address that the ‘right to regulate the use of wealth in the public interest is universally admitted.’
‘MOOCHERS ‘universally admit’ this right to regulate aka the right to extort from producers at gunpoint, money and goods in order to buy votes from non/under producers. Commie Claptrap like this really brings out the ‘HOOD’ in robin hood.
....too bad TEDDY never got a chance to read Milton Friedman’s ‘FREE TO CHOOSE’ (Your loss small grasshopper.)
30
posted on
12/08/2011 1:24:35 AM PST
by
flat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson