Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did FDR Provoke Pearl Harbor?
Townhall.com ^ | December 6, 2011 | Pat Buchanan

Posted on 12/06/2011 3:32:36 PM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: Kaslin
FDR's economy was not gaining steam and his poll numbers were starting to slip badly.

I can easily believe that he may have considered war an antidote to this problem.

21 posted on 12/06/2011 4:00:58 PM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Did FDR Provoke Pearl Harbor?”

The cruise of the Great White Fleet under Theodore Roosevelt’s administration was partially a message to check Japanese expansionism. The Japanese were determined to dominate Asia- they proved that by thrashing China in 1895, and then Russia in 1905, their seizure of Germany’s Asian possessions in WWI, and then their expansion into China after 1931. Opposition to this expansion- and that was the general thrust of US policy beginning with T.R.- pretty much set Japan against the US, regardless of what FDR thought or did.


22 posted on 12/06/2011 4:07:55 PM PST by GenXteacher (He that hath no stomach for this fight, let him depart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunTzuWu
"Just like Poland provoked Hitler."

Thank you for that. I get so sick of this garbage. I despise FDR, but I think he was in the minority to see the extreme dangers posed by Germany and Japan. The "FDR-Knew-In-Advance" is one of of the lies in my book "48 Liberal Lies About American History" and, yes, it was started by a liberal (a Marxist, actually) Charles Beard.

23 posted on 12/06/2011 4:08:42 PM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; All

Had we not faced the Japanese after 12/7/1941 we would have faced them later when they were stronger. FDR was right.


24 posted on 12/06/2011 4:10:01 PM PST by arrogantsob (Obama must Go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillGunn
FDR antagonized the Japanese

You, and other FReepers who want to make up your own minds would do well to follow Homer_J_Simpson's daily retrospective on the NY Times from 70 years ago. Don't just start tomorrow with the news of the attack on Pearl Harbor. Go back two months and read, and see what you think.

ML/NJ

25 posted on 12/06/2011 4:10:12 PM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

I think you’re thinking of the RMS Titanic which was rammed by a Russian sub in the Bering Sea in 1952.


26 posted on 12/06/2011 4:10:55 PM PST by SkyDancer ("If You Want To Learn To Love Better, You Should Start With A Friend Who You Hate")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lou Budvis
Had they gone back for a successful 3rd strike on Dec. 7, one wonders how the war would’ve turned out.

The third strike would be to take out the oil storage facilities at Pearl which speculation says would have extended the war by 2 years.

27 posted on 12/06/2011 4:12:55 PM PST by Recon Dad ("The most important rule in a gunfight is: Always win and cheat if necessary.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon; Homer_J_Simpson; writer33

lol. The Japanese had been planning and practicing the attack on Pearl Harbor for a decade. They trained naval pilots with a mock-up of Pearl Harbor.

The Japanese were going to attack sooner or later whether the US did anything or not. The Japanese were planning to conquer the entire Pacific. Or did Borneo, Philippines, Singapore and all those other places also “maneuver” the Japanese into attacking them?


28 posted on 12/06/2011 4:13:57 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Attack on PH *caused* the Vietnam War.

Umm.....ok. Yeah, right.


29 posted on 12/06/2011 4:14:17 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj; Homer_J_Simpson

Yes, it has been very enlightening. He has been doing this for over a year... maybe two.


30 posted on 12/06/2011 4:17:01 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

I do think that Japans’ invasion and rape of China helped topple the nationalists and bring about Red China. Maybe we should make Japan fix that?


31 posted on 12/06/2011 4:20:42 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet

One thinks that they could have done a better job. I wonder what the “Cheney is Evil Agent of Halliburton” crowd thinks about this question. After all, “truth is the first casualty in war”, you know.


32 posted on 12/06/2011 4:21:39 PM PST by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GenXteacher

The Japanese considered TR to be an honest broker as a result of his efforts to end to Russo-Japanese war. TR was the only statesman with good relations with all the leaders of the WWI beligerents at the beginning of the war. Too bad he wasn’t elected in ‘12, if there was anyone who could’ve brought all sides together and averted the tragedy of WWI, it was TR.


33 posted on 12/06/2011 4:23:47 PM PST by Lou Budvis (Newt/Marco '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lou Budvis
Had they gone back for a successful 3rd strike on Dec. 7, one wonders how the war would’ve turned out.

I have often wondered what would have happened if the Japanese had invaded only the Dutch East Indies--the source of the oil they wanted--and maybe Thailand, proclaiming the move a "peacekeeping operation," and not attacked the US or crossed into British territory. Would we have done anything? Or how about if they had invaded the Society Islands, which include Tahiti, New Caledonia, the Marquesas Islands and other French possessions? The French most likely would have surrendered without firing a shot, but would we have done anythng?

Similarly, what would have happened if Japan had attacked only the US and that the air, ground and naval forces used to attack British and Dutch possessions had been used to attack Hawaii, the western Aleutians or other US targets. Could they have knocked us out?

34 posted on 12/06/2011 4:26:45 PM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

We didn’t start the war —I’m happy we won.

But did FDR *want* to war on Japan with no moral responsibility for STARTING it? Why, yes —that’s absolutely true.

And Churchill very badly wanted FDR in the war, and the two had been working for quite some time on how to manage it, when presto, finally the Japanese threw the solution right into their laps.

Did Japan deserve to get whipped? Oh sure..!

They didn’t attack just the USA —they attacked Hong Kong, Singapore, Malasia, Vietnam, Australia, the British, and others, and ALL AT ONCE.

In fact, in Singapore when they took over the hospitals, they went from bed to bed, simply bayonetting doctors and patients. They even shot nurses and doctors performing surgery.

It also turned out that the IJA had made absolutely NO PLANS AT ALL for provisioning for POWs and conquered peoples —nothing at all.


35 posted on 12/06/2011 4:32:48 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunTzuWu
Just like Poland provoked Hitler.

I like how the article doesn't criticize Japan for invading other nations and committing horrendous atrocities, but criticizes the US for freezing Japan's assets here in the US and denying Japan access to the oil it needed to continue conquering other nations and committing those atrocities.

What's next? Is the author going to claim that the US was being mean for denying Japan access to ports in Hawaii or Alaska? Is the author going to criticize the US for helping Australia against Japan?
36 posted on 12/06/2011 4:34:06 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lou Budvis
"Our nation was most definitely preparing for war eight months before Pearl Harbor."

China invaded by Japan in '37.

Germany invaded Poland in '39.

Lend-lease started in '41.

No doubt somebody at the War Department was taking notice.

37 posted on 12/06/2011 4:36:59 PM PST by radioone ("2012 can't come soon enough")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: LS

but I think he was in the minority to see the extreme dangers posed by Germany and Japan.

Below are two paragraphs taken from, Daniel Yergin’s “The Prize”.

All that day, the reports flowed into Washington from Pearl Harbor disjointed, fragmentary, and finally, dismal. “The news coming from Haawaii is very bad.” Stimson noted in his diary at the end of that long Sunday. “It has been staggering to see our people there, who have been warned long ago and were standing at alert, should have been so caught by surprise.” How could such a disaster have occurred.
Senior American officials had fully expected a Japanese attack, and imminently. But they expected it to be in Southeast Asia. Virtually no one, whether in Washington or Hawaii, seriously considered, or even comprehended, that Japan could - or would- launch a surprise assault against the American fleet in its home base. They believed, as General Marshall had told President Roosevelt in May of 1941, that the island of Oahu, where Pearl Harbor was located, was “the strongest fortress in the world.” Most of the American officials seemed to have forgotten-or never knew-that Japan’s great victory in the Russo-Japanese War have begun with a surprise attack on the Russian fleet at Port Arthur.


38 posted on 12/06/2011 4:38:35 PM PST by Recon Dad ("The most important rule in a gunfight is: Always win and cheat if necessary.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
Thanks for posting that link. I was gonna mention it. It's been really interesting reading the diplomatic reports. Ominous when you know what's coming.

I second the recommendation. Very interesting stuff.

39 posted on 12/06/2011 4:38:46 PM PST by Huck (LIBERTY is the object.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
The die was cast when the US cut off oil to Japan. They had about a month's worth to keep their industry going. With no other choice than pulling out of China (no small matter BTW) they used their oil to OPEN THE ROUTE TO INDONESIA which had the oil they needed.

Pearl Harbor was intended to keep the US from doing anything about it.

Boy did they screw up.

Now, let's say that didn't happen and we kept feeding them oil. They had an atom bomb program under way ~ not many results at the time but they understood the concepts behind several different possible atom bombs.

It was just a matter of time and it could have been the Japanese making sure we did not achieve hegemony over the Pacific ocean through adroit threats to use atom bombs on us.

Should I say it ~ naw, wouldn't be fair, naw, go ahead, say it anyway ~ the East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere would have included China, Siberia, Yakutia, Manchuria, SE Asia and probably everything East of the Ganges.

You'd seen Harry Truman signing a START treaty with Japan that would make the US a Nuclear Free Zone.

40 posted on 12/06/2011 4:42:32 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson