Skip to comments.Left 'speechless' as Sebelius overrules FDA on access to morning-after pill (2012 politics)
Posted on 12/08/2011 3:38:52 AM PST by Libloather
Left 'speechless' as Sebelius overrules FDA on access to morning-after pill
By Sam Baker - 12/07/11 06:28 PM ET
In a decision steeped in 2012 politics, President Obamas top health official on Wednesday overruled government scientists to block wider access to the so-called morning-after pill.
The decision to leave in place a requirement that women younger than 17 get a prescription for the drug was a huge surprise to liberal groups and advocates for the Plan B contraceptive, some of whom said they were left speechless by Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebeliuss involvement.
It came a day after Sebelius traveled to Kansas on Air Force One with the president, but it is unclear whether the two discussed the decision. An administration official was not aware of any conversations about the pill between the two, and said the decision was Sebeliuss alone.
Wednesday was the deadline for the Food and Drug Administration to make a decision about the drug, and the agencys scientists recommended broader over-the-counter access.
FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg made clear in a statement Wednesday that she agreed with the agencys scientific reviewers that Plan B should be provided over the counter.
In quashing the decision, Sebelius acted quickly in a letter to the FDA Wednesday morning that said she was not convinced about the evidence supported expanding over-the-counter access to Plan B.
It is commonly understood that there are significant cognitive and behavioral differences between older adolescent girls and the youngest girls of reproductive age, which I believe are relevant to making this determination as to non-prescription availability of this product for all ages, Sebelius wrote.
It is highly unusual for the HHS secretary to publicly overrule the decisions made by FDA reviewers. Even major steps such as pulling drugs completely off the market have almost always come from the agencys career staff.
Plan B is legal and FDA-approved, without a prescription, for women 17 and older. The FDA concluded that there was no medical or scientific basis for requiring 16-year-olds to get a prescription but letting 17-year-olds buy the drug directly from a pharmacist.
The fact that Secretary Sebelius overruled Commissioner Hamburg and the FDA professional staff is unbelievable, said Susan Wood, who resigned from the FDA because of the Bush administrations handling of Plan B. I cannot understand it, and I have no idea why this happened.
She was one of several critics who accused Sebelius of bowing to political pressure rather than letting the FDAs scientists do their jobs.
We expected this kind of action from the Bush administration, so its doubly disheartening and unacceptable that this administration chose to follow this path, NARAL Pro-Choice America said in a statement.
Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) also said Sebelius should have stayed out of the Plan B decision.
I think its very unfortunate the secretary made the decision that she did, Waxman said. The FDA is a scientific agency, and they gave her their recommendation based on the science, and I think she should have followed it.
Republicans believe Plan B causes abortions, and have pressed hard to restrict access to the drug. If the FDA decision had gone forward, it is possible Obama could have come under criticism from the Republican field of presidential candidates for making abortion more accessible.
Some Republicans had threatened to cut the FDAs budget if it allowed women younger than 17 to get Plan B without a prescription. During the Bush administration, senior HHS and White House officials stepped in multiple times to slow the FDAs consideration of Plan B.
That political involvement infuriated liberal groups and some scientific advocates, who were stunned to see what they viewed as a similar action by the Obama administration.
Wood said Sebeliuss intervention left her speechless.
I dont know where it comes from but it is not the FDA, Wood said. It is way too reminiscent
this is appalling.
Flak meets Agenda!
obamma mamba jamma lenin khomeini...look into my eyes..your getting booooored, real bored...now give me your children, and your wallet......you have too much anyway...
Everything will be shoved down our throats after the fraudulent election.
“Republicans believe Plan B causes abortions....”
Nope, no bias there.
“Plan B” is an abortifacient, pure and simple.
Notice how hey say scientist, scientist, scientist that are advocating wider access. Bullpucky! They are bureaucratic activists with a political agenda. There is no science involved in this policy decision! They even quote one who quit the FDA because Bush blocked her political agenda!
LIBs want to murder all children. How “progressive”...
How many 14 year old girls know a 17 year old that will go in and buy it for them? This is not going to change much of anything, heck kids will just deal in it like they do a joint now.
Liberals want 13 year-olds to have unlimited, unprotected sex followed by unrestricted, unsupervised access to drugs that cause spontaneous abortions.
The primary motivation for easy access is to help the pimps, especially the ones trafficking underage girls.
She's still protecting them now, by limiting access to the morning-after pill. If girls can buy abortion pills over-the-counter, they won't have to visit the abortion clinic.
Sebelius and PP like it the way it is now - legal, free, making them rich from taxpayer dollars.
“Wood said Sebeliuss intervention left her speechless.”
Looks like Planned Parenthood out-bid the Plan B manufacturer on the kick-back issue.
They want to put this pill out on the shelves but anyone wanting a cold medication has to beg for it. The left are all crazy as he**.
With her that’s more than likely exactly what happened.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.