Jerry Sandusky's Wife Denies She Ignored Rapes

ABC News ^ | Dec. 8, 2011 | COLLEEN CURRY

[BunnySlippers]

Yep.

[hinckley buzzard]

Many women often look the other way.

Idk about "many" but this skank sure did.

[Palladin]

So disgusting. There are so many enablers. The whole community should be outraged to have these predators living among them.

My wish would be for lightning to strike the Sandusky house —preferably while Jerry and the Missus are in the shower. (Of course, they wouldn’t be there together...Jerry only showers with little boys.)

[Hammer Tym]

Says she didn’t know....Yeah right. She’s trying to save her posterior from ending up in the pen, just like Madoff’s wife. Now that she knows about these claims, why is she sticking around with the SOB, and not divorcing him?

[DoughtyOne]

There are instances where you might be right, but please don’t trot out that “women instinctively know” line.

When it comes to men, women can be the most clueless people on the planet.

Of course the same can be said of men, when it comes to their instincts about women.

Both sexes get it part of the time, when it comes to people of the opposite sex. Being married to people is no guarantee of anything.

[Williams]

I’m also aware of at least one witness to HIM doing something. That was not the wife. Do I think he’s guilty? yeah. Could the wife have been suspicious? Yeah.

Fist, I def am mot ready to lynch the wife, esp notwithstanding.

Second, I am suspicious of the latest story about being kept in a basement and raped for days whike screaming for help. May have happened, I just have a healthy suspicion. I wasn’t there.

[wrench]

>Many women often look the other way.<

And the reason they do it is so they have continued access to their husbands money.

At one time I would have never believed anyone would turn a blind eye to child rape, but there was a case nearby of just that. The wife knew, but covered for her (wealthy) husband.

Sickening, and I hope all like this rot in hell for eternity.

[Jonty30]

Of those that live with abusers, most do.

[Outlaw Woman]

Wasn’t aware it was a popular ‘line’ as you put it but I don’t buy that she knew ‘nothing’. And I stand by that women “know” when something is amiss.

[miss marmelstein]

I’ve had my suspicions about this old bag since I read that a doll was in the window of the Sandusky house. I found that detail very, very creepy. And most people suspect she’s the one who put it in the window.

[Jonty30]

Women are for more in tune with their husband’s personal patterns than men are with their wives.

Unless the man had a thing for children, prior to meeting her, and was able to hide for her at that point, she would have noticed his changes in how he went about things.

Men are very direct and simple in terms of how they do things.

[Palladin]

I wonder did Dottie wash the sheets, or did she have a maid? Either way, someone else knew what Jerry was doing to kids in that basement, and didn’t report it.

Motel maids assert that gay men make the biggest messes in the shower and in the sheets. You would think there would be a lot of blood from the anal rape of little boys.

Just some questions for investigators to ask of Mrs. Sandusky and anyone who cleaned her house.

[null and void]

I suspect when a woman knows something like this it is because the man's behavior towards her changes.

If this was happening from day one the behavior would have no reason to change, it would have always been like that.

It would be "normal"...

[lightman]

The way that some in the community wanted to fund the defense of these pervs (ex University President Spanier, for one; the way that dozens of others rioted in "support" of Joe Pa---I'd say that much of the State College community are enablers.

[hosepipe]

[ Isn’t it too damn easy to join this lynch mob? How about waiting till someone knows what actually happened? ]

Maybe he just offered them some Jesus juice!!..
like the guy that wore his under pants on the outside..
What was his name?..

[Palladin]

Maybe the Old Guard there are complicit, but there are many young families, new residents, right on the street where Sandusky lives, who want him kept in jail, not out on parole.

Sandusky’s back deck overlooks the playground of the elementary school.

Tar and feathers, anyone?

[null and void]

As you say...

[FamiliarFace]

I haven’t heard about the doll in the window. What’s that all about?

[lightman]

Sandusky did not make bail yesterday when arrested on the latest charges and had to spend at least one night in the Centre County Prison.

I’m hoping for a little “jailhouse justice” and a taste of his own medicine. Don’t drop the soap, Jerry.

[Colofornian]

This crowd would run out and murder the guy’s wife and you all know what she knew, why she did it, just like the couple that buried kids in the UK, on and on. Isn’t it too damn easy to join this lynch mob?

You know, it wasn't all that long ago (I think Summer of 2010) when a FREEPER poster mentioned that some of the other posters would have enough mayhem in them to be linked to a murder that just occurred in Visalia, CA.

That FREEPER poster was zotted for saying what he did.

Here, you've just said "This crowd would run out and murder the guy’s wife..."

I frankly don't see too much of a distinction between what got that 2010 FREEPER zotted and what you just said -- other than the Visalia murder was actual and your comment is a "mere" potential.

Either way, you and that zotted one are accusing other FREEPERS of murderous intent.

I'm not the "zot" decision-maker around here, but in case the AM might be interested, wanna explain to him/her why your accusation doesn't constitute a potentially "zottable" offense?