Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich Describes Palestinian People as 'Invented'
Fox News ^ | 12/10/2011 | Fox News

Posted on 12/10/2011 9:24:58 AM PST by TBBT

Newt Gingrich declared in an interview that Palestinians are an "invented" people, though his campaign afterward claimed the candidate still supports the establishment of a Palestinian state. The front-running Republican presidential candidate made the comments in an interview with The Jewish Channel. The interview marks some of the toughest language to date any candidate has used to describe the Middle East peace process. It also comes after Gingrich pledged at a forum earlier in the week that if elected, he would name John Bolton -- a hawkish, pro-Israel former U.N. ambassador who served in the George W. Bush administration -- as his secretary of state.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: invention; newt; newtgingrich; palestine; palestinians; palestiniansinvented
Many media heads are going to explode on this one. How dare anybody say anything critical or non-PC about the Palestinians. Facts be damn.
1 posted on 12/10/2011 9:25:12 AM PST by TBBT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Newt is right about this one.

And his remark about picking John Bolton as SOS was smart.


2 posted on 12/10/2011 9:29:51 AM PST by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Historically he is right. The old Roman term covered a majority of the middle-east but you don’t see other countries there giving up their land for ‘Palestine”. The recent ‘Palestinians” are refugees from Lebanon and Syria with modern ‘activists’ thrown in. If they were serious about ‘returning Palestine’, Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan would all need to step up and give up their lands too.


3 posted on 12/10/2011 9:30:01 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT
There goes the media's 3 week infatuation with Newtie.

How dare he speak the truth about a protected class !!

Stone him !!!


4 posted on 12/10/2011 9:38:31 AM PST by Iron Munro ("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you." John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

They are. About time the truth was told.


5 posted on 12/10/2011 9:45:20 AM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

He’s exactly right... they are invented, but why support a Palestian state?

Of course, they wouldn’t have any place that would welcome them, but I guess they could disguise themselves as Iranians.


6 posted on 12/10/2011 9:48:00 AM PST by altura (Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Newt is pushing the right buttons. He improves his support on a daily basis. The base is clearly more anxious to hear someone who will fight than they ever will be about the PC ankle biters who are bent on hitting him rather than Obozo. This ought to really piss off the Newt will implode folks.


7 posted on 12/10/2011 9:49:17 AM PST by Steamburg (The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

I’ll bet Christianne Amanpour is about to have a stroke. LOL!!!


8 posted on 12/10/2011 9:51:40 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Newt will never be my first choice, but if he is willing to expand on this sort of truth and plainspeak, it will make the thought of pulling the lever (touching the screen) for him a bit easier.


9 posted on 12/10/2011 9:51:57 AM PST by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Newt is 100% right. There is no such thing as a Palestinian people or even Palestinian culture. They are just plain old Arabs.


10 posted on 12/10/2011 9:53:47 AM PST by libertarian neocon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: altura
He’s exactly right... they are invented, but why support a Palestinian state?

It can be said Americans are an invented people can it not?

11 posted on 12/10/2011 9:53:57 AM PST by newzjunkey (Republicans will find a way to reelect Obama and Speaker Pelosi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

No, we are not an invented people. Does not a country called the USA exist? Show us where, at anytime in history a country called Palestine existed, especially when it existed exactly where Israel stands today. Since there was never a Palestine there never existed a Palestine people, therefore they are an invented people. Americans MADE their country and became Americans after the country was formed.


12 posted on 12/10/2011 10:14:05 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: calex59
No, we are not an invented people. Does not a country called the USA exist? Show us where, at anytime in history a country called Palestine existed, especially when it existed exactly where Israel stands today. Since there was never a Palestine there never existed a Palestine people, therefore they are an invented people. Americans MADE their country and became Americans after the country was formed.

So if they have a country they will become a people?

13 posted on 12/10/2011 10:19:29 AM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

FTA: “Gingrich pledged at a forum earlier in the week that if elected, he would name John Bolton — a hawkish, pro-Israel former U.N. ambassador who served in the George W. Bush administration — as his secretary of state.”

Okay, right there he got my support.


14 posted on 12/10/2011 10:20:24 AM PST by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarian neocon
That's not quite what Newt said. He merely pointed out that the Palestinians were "invented". America and Americans were "invented" ~ actually several times, first, in the mind of King Philippe II/III of Spain as a sort of Protestant ghetto where he and his other Hapsburg relatives could send troublesome people from all over Europe.

Interesting concept. I'm still very much in awe of the King ~ this was divinely inspired.

Then, we were reinvented in about 1676, then again in 1775, then in 1861.

What I find interesting in this is the fact that the Palestinians can't bear the fact that their "nation hood" is a recent invention. They imagine it's an insult to live in an "invented" nation. We consider it a visible manifestation of God's Grace.

There's not going to be any communication with these people possible until they finally realize they owe it to the West for their liberation from the Ottoman Empire, and to America for their liberation from the British and French!

15 posted on 12/10/2011 10:40:23 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Actually, we were invented by King Philippe II/III (of Spain). It is an incontrovertible fact.


16 posted on 12/10/2011 10:42:40 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
We weren't invented by anyone. You facts are BS. We were made but the British subjects who had had enough of King George. Our country exists therefore we are and we are not invented, this country was made not made up. Palestinians are a made up people, made up out of whole cloth with no history to back them up.

I would say you are either a muslim or a some other Jew hater.

17 posted on 12/10/2011 10:52:44 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Newt’s right on. They are but rejected Arabs and as pointed out their neighbors could easily give them land for their country. They’re a manufactured, financed populace.


18 posted on 12/10/2011 11:01:32 AM PST by mcshot (Neither handsome nor handy but took an oath and will vote to save our Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calex59
You are so full of it. I had people here in 1598 ~ there presence was recorded, and they had names ~ Northern European names. They lived in Spanish North America. Then, King Philippe II/III divided the land among Spain, France (and in a separate codicil for Russia to be determined later). He set aside a portion of the land for "others" ~ that was the area from Nova Scotia in the North to Carolana in the South (present N/S Carolina). Eventually even Carolana came under English rule, but that didn't happen in 1604.

The English are Johnny Come Lately's to the Americas ~

BTW, Virginia counts its history from the very foundations of the first Spanish permanent campsites on the East Coast. We were a nation created by people who are themselves known to history. We invented ourselves ~

19 posted on 12/10/2011 11:02:03 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Calex59, AMERICANS believe that they created their nation ~ why you don’t want to believe that is a good question. Do you think somebody else did it?


20 posted on 12/10/2011 11:03:55 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

21 posted on 12/10/2011 11:04:01 AM PST by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb

I understand trebb as I now want a fighter and Newt seems ready to fit the bill and takeover.


22 posted on 12/10/2011 11:11:08 AM PST by mcshot (Neither handsome nor handy but took an oath and will vote to save our Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

“It can be said Americans are an invented people can it not?”

Yes but our melting pot has not only been able to take care of our own but most of the damn world.


23 posted on 12/10/2011 11:13:54 AM PST by mcshot (Neither handsome nor handy but took an oath and will vote to save our Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Rick Perry mentioned Bolton as his secretary of state a long time ago. Newt’s gonna have to get in line.


24 posted on 12/10/2011 1:23:20 PM PST by altura (Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

I guess anything could be said if one doesn’t mind making a fool of oneself.

I don’t, myself.


25 posted on 12/10/2011 1:25:02 PM PST by altura (Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Wasn’t Jordan also invented?


26 posted on 12/10/2011 2:17:50 PM PST by rwa265 ("This is My Beloved Son, Listen to Him.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
" We consider it a visible manifestation of God's Grace."

While they have zero comprehension of the concept of God's Grace. (See tagline...)

27 posted on 12/10/2011 8:57:46 PM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

I was referring to the “Palestinians” ~ many of whom are Christian ~


28 posted on 12/11/2011 4:43:59 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

“Actually, we were invented by King Philippe II/III (of Spain). It is an incontrovertible fact.”

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


29 posted on 12/11/2011 5:15:14 AM PST by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
Treaty of London 1604.

But before that we see that the development of what is now New Mexico as a modern state began in 1598 ~ the year King Philippe I/II and Queen Elizabeth I died ~ as did the opening up of Nova Scotia. Both places saw "the first Thanksgiving"

An age passed and a new order arose. American's have nothing to be ashamed of in their invention of themselves ~ "one from many".

30 posted on 12/11/2011 5:26:54 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: x

So if they have a country they will become a people?
*******************************************

That’s how it works. There wasn’t Americans until there was an America.


31 posted on 12/11/2011 5:46:11 AM PST by kara37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

The Treaty of London has nothing to do with the establishment of the US. It ended a war between England and Spain. It did NOT settle America, nor did the Spanish - apart from the deep south coastal areas & in a very minor and unimportant way my own southwest.

And Spain did NOTHING but suck wealth FROM any place they colonized.


32 posted on 12/11/2011 11:50:43 AM PST by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
You are so terribly vacuous.

King Philippe I/II (formerly King of Spain AND King of England ~ he was Bloody Mary's husband) got into an eternal war with the English and with Protestantism in general.

He died in 1598. Until he died Spain effectively prevented EVERYONE ELSE from having more than a passing interest in the Americas.

After he died King Philippe II/III, his son, decided to put an end to the conflicts and get on with the development of the Americas (and though a fair share of the credit probably goes to his counselors who also worked for his relatives throughout the so-called Hapsburg Empire, we have to assign the primary credit to Philippe II/III.

I know you don't want to do that but that's because you have no interest in history.

So, by 1604 Philippe II/III had created what was called The Treaty of London (1604) and literally crammed it down the throat of all the powers who wanted a piece of America.

In doing that he gave Europe 20 years of peace ~ an unusual condition for them.

You should read that treaty some day.

Once it was promulgated, and commercial contacts re-established, the French began settling their assigned area, as did Scotland (it's called Nova Scotia these days, but it was also called Acadia back in the day ~ and included what is now hunks of New York, Maine, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia ~ fairly good sized territory which had bounds that'd not yet been surveyed).

A space between the highest peaks of the Eastern Cordillera (the Appalachians) and the Atlantic, between Carolana (later just Florida) in the South, and Nova Scotia in the North was set aside for OTHERS, not specifically England, but not exactly something the English couldn't go to.

There had already been settlements in the region ~ 30 of them to be exact, and only 3 have been studied to any extent.

That territory eventually became the core of the United States 173 years later.

The American people, however, came on the scene quite a bit earlier ~ and they came from throughout Europe, not just England. You can read the Booke of the Livinge and the Deade at any Virginia Room in a main library in any county in the Commonwealth and they are ALL LISTED. For my benefit they list those who were there BEFORE the division of the land ~ and even the Spanish had some records of those others who worked or them or, who were actually titled Spanish noblemen. Many of them stayed on in Virginia after Spain formally withdrew its protection from the territory.

Self government in the borning USA was a vital necessity. The climate was dreadful with recurring hurricanes, brutal winters, floods, tornados ~~~. Only the toughest of the tough, the best of all the best people could make it. And they did.

So, you are telling me America didn't start here not far from where I'm seated? America and its customs and traditions started WITH the Treaty of London 1604. This state has, in fact, a government that counts continuity all the way back to the bill of sale granted to The Virginia Company.

BTW, Spain didn't give England anything at all in that Treaty. And they specifically denied access to the Dutch (with whom they were still at war).

Do not be misled by popular histories.

33 posted on 12/11/2011 12:13:23 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Care to discuss what the Spanish actually DID in Virginia? How about Arizona? They did have

If we were talking the West Indies, or Florida by itself, you would have a minor point. Very minor, since there is no Spanish influence in the US worth mentioning. They claimed California, but did little to actually settle it. At the time of the Gold Rush, the non-native population of California was a whopping 15,000. By 1854, it was over 300,000.

Want to explain again how Spain made America what it is?


34 posted on 12/11/2011 1:04:18 PM PST by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
Since I didn't say Spain made America what it is today I see no reason to explain it to you.

I said the American people CREATED THEMSELVES.

And that event has a starting point. Spain was certainly involved

You seem to be wanting to read something into this that's not there. But if you must know a fair number of my non-Hispanic ancestors were present in what is now the United States On or BEFORE 1598 ~ and they were very influential in what you see here today.

I absolutely despise it when immigrants fresh off the boat want to tell me all about America! Just complain and bicker, and tell us all about it. You don't like it, there are OTHER PLACES YOU CAN GO TO!

35 posted on 12/11/2011 1:11:09 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
BTW, Daniel Boone received 1000 arpents of land at Arrow Rocks from the Spanish agent (near what is now St. Louis, or maybe across the river from Galena IL) and became a judge over a vast territory which Spain wished to develop by settling Americans.

You did know his wife was a Beeber (Bebier)~ while your people were cooling their heels in Lower Slobovia the Spanish prepared the primary survey for all of North America and began a number of local surveys in the Gulf (but not Florida in general). A little later (1700s) they definitely surveyed much of the Louisiana Territory. Their markers continue to be found everywhere. They kept POWs from their wars in the Mediterranean at St. Elena in Carolana (now South Carolina).

I have found over 50 towns in the Midwest and Central South that were laid out and settled by Spanish traders and miners BEFORE Jamestown became a reality.

The problem here was the place was immense ~ North America is far larger than South America, plus the plague that had been killing people by the millions in the South had already begun working its way through the North. By 1648 almost all the Eastern indians had died of it ~ most in a single winter. Whites and Africans died from the same diseases. Spain's population simply wasn't sufficient to supply the manpower needed for the purpose of civilizing this continent.

Now, let's see ~ what else did they do ~ well, since the overwhelming majority of the Spaniards in the Northern territories had Galician, Basque and Dutch surnames they were for all practical purpose undifferentiated from Bretons and Welsh or Dutch and French people. They simply stayed on as the ownership and control of territory changed.

i've found numerous examples of individuals with Spanish surnames being the very first to register land claims and purchases the day the government agent arrived in the Old Northwest to open up sales. They were there waiting to become part of the larger picture. If they'd waited around they'd been driven out as squatters or worse ~ been treated like the French in Vincinnes. They had a special exception written into the law but some of their land claims weren't settled with the US government and the state of Indiana until the mid 1800s.

Could be history didn't really notice Spanish settlers because they knew better than to create waves. They simply melted into the broad picture of "a new nation".

36 posted on 12/11/2011 1:28:42 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

No one here prior to 1600 had ANY significant effect on the development of America, other than to note the place existed.

They claimed California too, but they didn’t POPULATE it. Like modern Spaniards, they were all talk and no action.


37 posted on 12/11/2011 3:44:03 PM PST by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
Spain claimed everything except Labrador and Brazil.

The fact you haven't studied the question of Spanish occupation of North America prior to 1600 doesn't mean that nothing was happening.

In fact, your failure to note the Iroquois development of a nation state suggests you just haven't read all that much.

Noteworthy is the fact Spain didn't even bother trying to develop California until the late 1700s. That's 200 years later. The argument had been that the climate was terrible and it was too expensive to support a colonial activity overland from the core of Mexico. Turned out the California settlements were supplied mostly from the Philippines.

Regarding folks who "populated" California, there were, of course, the Indians, but more importantly were American traders and trappers ~ who were there BEFORE the Spanish set up the first Mission.

At one point, outside of the Indians, the most numerous category of people in California were Aleutian Islanders (all men, with good jobs, they married local Indians and when their colony was shut down took them with them to Russia).

It turned out California was incredibly difficult to settle and the assignment of land grants didn't help that problem much.

What you need to do is go through the California, Texas, New Mexico, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida records regarding land grants and find a couple owned by your own ancestors. You might be pleasantly surprised that there are a good number of Americans who received landgrants from Spain.

Property transfers were handled a tad differently in the Louisiana Territory (owned by Spain long before they were conquered by Napoleon. He made promises to them regarding taxes, land titles, laws and immigration then broke them all by selling Louisiana to Thomas Jefferson).

I think you need to study upon this stuff.

38 posted on 12/11/2011 4:08:08 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

“I think you need to study upon this stuff. “

I think Spaniards left about as much effect on America as...hmmm...the Indonesians? They claimed a lot, but didn’t achieve anything lasting.


39 posted on 12/11/2011 4:28:07 PM PST by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
Spain (the Hapsburg's really) OWNED the Western Hemisphere.

Get over it.

40 posted on 12/11/2011 4:29:15 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Feet on the ground “own” territory. Anything else is just hot air. And Spain had a lot of hot air, but very few feet.


41 posted on 12/11/2011 5:27:12 PM PST by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
Ever ask yourself where everybody else was at the time?

The answer is they were NOWHERE. France had but 20 million ~ and that population hadn't grown in 150 years. Spain had substantial population growth in the 1400 and 1500s ~ and could boast about 8.5 million. The Italian peninsula made 13 million, and Scandinavia (Swedish Empire) had nearly 2 million! Their close ally, England was pushing 5 million.

Poland had maybe 9 million but were hemmed in by Germany, Swedish Empire, Russia and the Carpathian mountains. Not a good spot to be to go somewhere.

The German states would have been 15 million tops.

We have NUMEROUS states with far more population than these European powers in or near 1600.

The Americas South of the Rio Grande are conceded by most authorities to have had at least 50 million by 1492, and less than that by 1600. Today Spain alone has about 50 million. Time has been very, very good to Spain.

North America had been more heavily populated 800 years earlier ~ recurring plagues, climate "changes", and so on caused serious disruptions in the head count.

42 posted on 12/11/2011 5:55:02 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson