Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Case for Ron Paul
American Thinker ^ | December 10, 2011 | Jason McNew

Posted on 12/10/2011 10:02:06 AM PST by Gennie

The Case for Ron Paul


By Jason McNew


Ron Paul, a physician, has earned himself the name "Dr. No" by refusing to vote for any bill which assumes powers other than those given in Article I, Section VIII of the Constitution. When one takes a sober look at our country today, it's easy to see why Dr. Paul would behave this way.

Take note that there is no authority in the Constitution for the setting of interest rates (as the Federal Reserve does) -- interference which led directly to the housing bubble (which Ron Paul predicted). Despite U.S. participation in several sizable wars, Congress has not bothered itself with actually declaring war since 1942 (on Romania). There is no authority to bail out banks, intervene in labor disputes, subsidize farming, regulate health insurance, or set educational policies. Every one of these unauthorized activities drives costs up (or drives prosperity down) and ultimately hurts average Americans. Increasingly, Americans are realizing that most of our social and economic ills can be traced to a failure to follow our own Constitution. Ron Paul has always been a strict, unapologetic Constitutionalist. How Ron Paul would govern as president can be envisioned by simply reading Article II of the Constitution (The Executive Branch.)

When it comes to the science of government, this statement by John Adams makes a perfect starting point for any debate: "The form of government which communicates happiness to the greatest number of persons, and in the greatest degree, is best."

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: constitution; federalreserve; fraudpaul; galvestonsnoopy; larouchies; liberty; morethorazineplease; paulestinians; rino; ronpaul; shrimpboats; yawn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
I know most do not favor Ron Paul on here, lol, but there are a few that are open to him so I figured I'd post this anyway.
1 posted on 12/10/2011 10:02:09 AM PST by Gennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gennie

2 posted on 12/10/2011 10:04:10 AM PST by humblegunner (The kinder, gentler version...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gennie

Most do not favor Wrong Paul in the country, not just on FR.


3 posted on 12/10/2011 10:09:01 AM PST by Grunthor (Newt, Perry, Santorum, Bachmann. That is all. None are worth fighting over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gennie

If it was September 10, 2001, I’d consider Paul.

But on the next day, he didn’t see what I saw.

Go Newt.


4 posted on 12/10/2011 10:09:11 AM PST by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gennie

Most do not favor Wrong Paul in the country, not just on FR.


5 posted on 12/10/2011 10:09:35 AM PST by Grunthor (Newt, Perry, Santorum, Bachmann. None are worth fighting over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Fandamntastic, humblegunner, you captured this perfectly.


6 posted on 12/10/2011 10:11:21 AM PST by Steamburg (The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gennie

One can only imagine who a president RP would appoint for his cabinet, he’s already said Dennis Kuchinich is one of his favorites. His Secretary of Defense?

And Supreme Court appointee? Perish the thought.


7 posted on 12/10/2011 10:14:05 AM PST by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steamburg

Even a blind hog finds an acorn once in a while! ;-)


8 posted on 12/10/2011 10:14:39 AM PST by humblegunner (The kinder, gentler version...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gennie

IMHO Paul does not do ‘sound bytes’ well which leave his positions open to misrepresentation by the MSM.

However I do like “I define foreign aid as taking money from poor people in rich countries and giving it to rich people in poor countries. “.

When it is pointed out that Paul would end foreign aid to Israel, it is not pointed out that by ending all foreign ail Israel would be better off. Currently “We give $3 billion a year to Israel in loans; and we give $12 billion or more in assistance to Israel’s self-declared enemies. Some of these are countries that say they will drive Israel into the sea. “

Our nation building has resulted in Islamic republics in Afghanistan and Iraq, the installing the Moslem Brotherhood, allies of al-Quaeda, in Egypt and Libya.

In addition remember that “the borrower is servant to the lender” and America should never be the master of Israel and its fate.


9 posted on 12/10/2011 10:17:10 AM PST by algernonpj (He who pays the piper . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gennie

Ron Paul is appealing because he’ll actually do something to protect the rights of Americans over the rights of lobbyists and minorities.

Say what you want about his foreign policy but I think the guy is serious when he votes no on bills to put you in jail at the President’s whim and wants to reign in the Fed who continues to feed these pigs bailouts.

I also happen to think he’s more electable than Newt (because Newt will get smoked by the liberal media over his 19 divorces, checks from Fannie Mae and that half-mil Tiffany’s account)


10 posted on 12/10/2011 10:19:11 AM PST by StrongandPround
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gennie; Bokababe
In addition, Paul's proposed budget would make a great starting point for dialogue, but have been ignored. Paul would not cut military pensions and benefits, nor SS for those retired and near retired, but would end freebies for illegals. all foreign aid, several entire departments.


11 posted on 12/10/2011 10:21:26 AM PST by algernonpj (He who pays the piper . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
Ron Paul is like the old Art Bell show. Just enough real guests and topics to enhance the "entertainment" stuff, and overlook the absolute crazies.

I think he would be more valuable as the new host of C2CAM, rather than someone with government executive power.

12 posted on 12/10/2011 10:24:20 AM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gennie; All

If he can find his way onto the ticket as the Republican candidate, I’ll vote for him. If he runs as an Independent, Libertarian or whatever, I’ll not vote for him. Ross Perot’s candidacy is still fresh in my mind.


13 posted on 12/10/2011 10:24:44 AM PST by davisfh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gennie

Very few, thank goodness.


14 posted on 12/10/2011 10:25:53 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gennie
The Mental Case: Wrong Paul


15 posted on 12/10/2011 10:27:04 AM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke

I liked Art. I still listen to “somewhere in time” when I can.....but I’d never want him to be POTUS.


16 posted on 12/10/2011 10:27:08 AM PST by Grunthor (Newt, Perry, Santorum, Bachmann. None are worth fighting over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gennie
The Case for Ron Paul

He’s more articulate than Rick Perry.

17 posted on 12/10/2011 10:29:33 AM PST by RichInOC (Palin 2012: The Perfect Storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

LOL!


18 posted on 12/10/2011 10:30:11 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gennie
"..Dr. Paul would behave this way."

No prejudice here.

Move along.

19 posted on 12/10/2011 10:31:23 AM PST by Designer (Nit-pickin' and chagrinin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

p


20 posted on 12/10/2011 10:36:40 AM PST by algernonpj (He who pays the piper . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson