Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tea Party Leaders: Rand Paul is Wrong on Newt Gingrich
US News and World Report ^ | 12/10/2011 | Mallie Jane Kim

Posted on 12/10/2011 10:11:49 AM PST by katiedidit1

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul's media blitz bashing former House Speaker Newt Gingrich as unworthy of Tea Party support isn't hitting its mark, at least not among leaders of the Tea Party Express, Tea Party Patriots, and Tea Party Nation.

"I want people to go out there and work for who they believe in," says Tea Party Express Chairman Amy Kremer, who says she or any individual shouldn't dictate who people in the movement ought to vote for.

"These people are intelligent. They're not just sheeple that are following somebody," Kremer says, adding that Tea Partyers haven't coalesced behind one candidate yet. "They are looking at the issues; they're researching."

(Excerpt) Read more at usnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: newt; newtgingrich; paul; randpaul; ronpaul; teaparties; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-158 next last

1 posted on 12/10/2011 10:11:56 AM PST by katiedidit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Nice to note that 3 major Tea Party Leaders disagree with Paul!


2 posted on 12/10/2011 10:13:13 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

“But Gingrich has a few Tea Party leader endorsements under his belt, including from Tea Party Nation founder and CEO Judson Phillips, who gives the former speaker leeway on what some conservatives see as his past mistakes. “Newt Gingrich is not perfect, but he is head and shoulders above the best candidate in the field right now,” he says.”


3 posted on 12/10/2011 10:15:33 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1
I didn't realize Kool-Aid has become the official drink of the Tea Party. Newt Gingrich is many times better than Barack Obama (and I will vote for him if he is the nominee) but big-government loving Newt is no conservative.
4 posted on 12/10/2011 10:16:27 AM PST by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1
“Newt Gingrich is not perfect, but he is head and shoulders above the best candidate in the field right now,”

This may very well be true. Sad, but true.

5 posted on 12/10/2011 10:17:10 AM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

There are no ‘leaders’ of the TEA movement - only self-appointed spokespeople who are, perhaps, more energetic, involved with organizing events and keep their pulse on the participants in their locale.

Family member got involved, ran on a TEA platform and won election by her own effort and the supporters she inspired.


6 posted on 12/10/2011 10:18:07 AM PST by sodpoodle ( Gingrich - flying solo - without congressional baggage!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bwc2221

Rand Paul won with Tea Party support but as Amy Kremer said...Tea Party folks are not sheeples and research the candidates on their own. Paul thought he was the voice of the nation’s many Tea Parties..like Rove, Coulter, Noonan, Krauthammer...guess he got a wake up call.


7 posted on 12/10/2011 10:19:48 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Tea Party “LEADERS?” The Tea Party movement has NO LEADERS. We are autonomous.

As the founder of the Mansfield North Central Ohio Tea Party Association, I can tell you NO ONE who has a legitimate Tea Party group listens to these publicity seekers.

We are NOT sheeple. We think for ourselves and I can tell you that the vast majority of people in our Tea Party will not vote for Gingrich or Romney or Paul. We want a true Conservative.


8 posted on 12/10/2011 10:21:24 AM PST by bimboeruption (Clinging to my Bible and my HK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle
Amy Kremer, Dick Armey and others are considered to be the head of their Tea Party Organizations. There are also feuds between a few tea parties.
9 posted on 12/10/2011 10:22:19 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Well, I think Rand Paul is right, and I question the legitimacy of these self-appointed tea party leaders to be dictating who is or is not worthy of tea party support.

Can they refute Rand Paul’s article:

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20111209/OPINION01/312090025/Rand-Paul-Republicans-would-take-giant-step-backward-by-choosing-Gingrich

Probably not.


10 posted on 12/10/2011 10:22:19 AM PST by BarnacleCenturion (Heartless & Inhumane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

I lean TEA Party....I’m voting for Newt in the primary.

I understand WHY Senator Paul is doing what he is doing. I respect Senator Paul in all honesty. In that same honesty I can never cast a vote for his father. Not ever.

The man looked at 9/11 and saw a crime or retribution for our support of Israel or even “and inside job” when normal people looked at 9/11 and saw a bloodthirsty war crime.

He does not support border security.

While he is personally pro-life, I do not believe that the Libertarian blood that flows in his veins would allow him to interject in a private decision and stop an abortion.

Prostitution and drugs? I don’t favor either of those things but I don’t hold it against Paul that he does.

Defense....he’d (imo)let millions die in nuclear fire rather than order a first strike upon an enemy.


11 posted on 12/10/2011 10:22:56 AM PST by Grunthor (Newt, Perry, Santorum, Bachmann. None are worth fighting over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

They just DID. Rand Paul is campaigning for his daddy. Numerous polls posted on FR have shown a lot of Tea Party folks support Newt.


12 posted on 12/10/2011 10:24:01 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption
We want a true Conservative.

Rots of ruck finding that creature..........

13 posted on 12/10/2011 10:24:45 AM PST by basil (It's time to rid the country of "gun free zones" aka "Killing Fields")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

They just DID. Rand Paul is campaigning for his daddy. Numerous polls posted on FR have shown a lot of Tea Party folks support Newt.


14 posted on 12/10/2011 10:25:15 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

So tell me. Why is it that you pure Newt posters seem to avoid things like talking up Newt’s new book?

Everything else about the man is superhuman awesome, why not that?


15 posted on 12/10/2011 10:30:48 AM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

I am a constitutionalist and support some of the Tea Parties (they do vary). Rand Paul was trying to get some “plugs” in for his daddy but it just doesn’t set well with the major Tea Partys.
Agree with you 100% on Ron Paul. How many times has he ran for president? on the one hand he is an isolationist and on the other hand he supports open borders. Clashing ideas?


16 posted on 12/10/2011 10:32:11 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Syncro; katiedidit1


The Tea Party Express is proud to stand for six simple principles

No more bailouts
Reduce the size and intrusiveness of government
Stop raising our taxes
Repeal Obamacare
Cease out-of-control spending
Bring back American prosperity

17 posted on 12/10/2011 10:32:29 AM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC:DONATE MONTHLY! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bwc2221

Pro-Life = CONSERVATIVE
Pro Defense = CONSERVATIVE
Pro America = CONSERVATIVE
Pro Israel = CONSERVATIVE
Capitalist = CONSERVATIVE
Close the Border = CONSERVATIVE

Better figure out who you are FOR and quit undermining the front runner!


18 posted on 12/10/2011 10:32:29 AM PST by G Larry ("I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his Character.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Thursday Rand Paul called Hannity’s radio show. Hannity said he is on the phone with breaking news. When he got him on the phone it was about his hit piece on Newt. Hannity told him he thought it was about some new legislation and that all candidates have their shortcomings including his dad. Later, Paul Rand was on Fox bashing Newt again and saying his dad can get the independents. I think Ron Paul has a lot of good things economically but he blames us for terror attacks and 9-11 and thinks Iran should have nukes. How can Rand Paul as a tea party person support that? Here is Mark Levin on Ron Paul:

Awesome: Mark Levin torches Ron Paul

This is a long clip, but it’s great. Levin completely dismantles Ron Paul over his recent statements about Bush being gleeful after 9/11, and his nutty foreign policy.

If you don’t have 17 minutes, then skip to 10:00 for the second segment. But you’ll be missing out on some great stuff.

http://www.therightscoop.com/awesome-mark-levin-torches-ron-paul/


19 posted on 12/10/2011 10:32:44 AM PST by sheikdetailfeather ("Kick The Communists Out Of Your Govt. And Don't Accept Their Goodies"-Yuri Bezmenov-KGB Defector)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

I really like Rand Paul and was thrilled he beat the asshole Jack Conway in Kentucky and thrilled he survived that set up attack where supposedly someone was mugged at his rally.

Having said that, I was horrified at his shameless attack on Newt. Rand boy, without Newt’s success in the 90s’, you don’t have a chance to run, let alone win, in Kentucky in 2010.


20 posted on 12/10/2011 10:33:29 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil

“We want a true Conservative.”

“Rots of ruck finding that creature..........”

The current crop of candidates makes me weep for the future of my country.


21 posted on 12/10/2011 10:33:43 AM PST by bimboeruption (Clinging to my Bible and my HK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All

woops! Rand Paul


22 posted on 12/10/2011 10:34:18 AM PST by sheikdetailfeather ("Kick The Communists Out Of Your Govt. And Don't Accept Their Goodies"-Yuri Bezmenov-KGB Defector)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Who do you support? I can’t speak for ALL the Newt supporters..only for myself. Have watched every debate and watched intensely; have read Newt’s solutions and also his site on NewtGingrichAnswersAttacks. Have looked at the remaining candidates...Huntsman, Paul, Santorum, Bachmann and Romney and concluded that Newt is the best man for America. I know all about Newt’s baggage and I also know his record as Speaker of the House. I am 100% behind Newt..and who do you support?


23 posted on 12/10/2011 10:36:17 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

mark levin also torches newt

AS HE SHOULD


24 posted on 12/10/2011 10:36:51 AM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

newt isn’t worthy of any form of tea party endorsement. If the tea party folks talking like they endorse newt as a tea party candidate, I will have Zero respect for the tea party.


25 posted on 12/10/2011 10:38:23 AM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Sure, add me. I do get emails from them but have not really kept up. Better to be on your ping list. BTW! hope you post the live debate thread for us tonight!


26 posted on 12/10/2011 10:38:43 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

>> Everything else about the man is superhuman awesome, why not that? >>

What a ridiculous statement. Nowhere have I seen a Newt supporter who thought he was perfect by any stretch. Quite the contrary. Most of the 35% (give or take) who support Newt now were part of the 95% who did not when he as at 5% - meaning they all knew of his problems.

But, in life, folks with extraordinary abilities and accomplishments get passes on more foibles than those of average ability and accomplishments. That’s just the way life is.

Newt has tremendous accomplishments and tremendous abilities - and the 35% or so who are support him now are simply saying that those plusses trump his minuses.

Now agree or disagree is fine. But when you characterize Newt supporters as not knowing or admitting his flaws, you simply show ignorance of what is going on.


27 posted on 12/10/2011 10:39:25 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

http://www.therightscoop.com/mark-levin-denounces-smear-attacks-on-newt-gingrich/

12-6-2011

I have to tell you that I’m looking at these attacks on Newt Gingrich, as an example, and I’m very troubled by them. They go beyond substantive and intellectual analysis of the man’s record, into attacking what people are claiming are some kind of psychosis and so forth, really smearing the guy. Really smearing the guy. OK?

I’ve said it before and I want to say it again. Every single one of our candidates is head and shoulders over Obama. Every single one of them loves this country, loves the Constitution, loves our economic system. They’re imperfect in many ways in their personal lives, some more than others, and in their policy positions over the decades, absolutely.

But I do know this! Not one of them is a Marxist. Not one of them seeks the destruction of the private sector. Not one of them seeks to massively increase the central government.

Now I have strong disagreements with several of them. But I do not believe that when we are eleven months away from the most important election in my lifetime, where Newt Gingrich may well be the nominee – and I’m making no predictions – that all the trashing and attacking and opposition research that’s being used, not to challenge his positions, but to character assassinate him, to absolutely destroy him.

I’m not joining in on that! As a matter of fact, I’m denouncing it!

Because if he is our nominee, I intend to fight with 100% of my energy to get that man elected, good, bad, and indifferent!


28 posted on 12/10/2011 10:39:39 AM PST by sheikdetailfeather ("Kick The Communists Out Of Your Govt. And Don't Accept Their Goodies"-Yuri Bezmenov-KGB Defector)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption
We think for ourselves and I can tell you that the vast majority of people in our Tea Party will not vote for Gingrich or Romney or Paul.

You crack me up. In the very same sentence you claim that people think for themselves and then go right ahead and monolithically speak for them all just like Paul tried to.

You also claim the Tea Party has no leaders and them boldly proclaim yourself as "The Founder of the Mansfield North Central Ohio Tea Party Association" and speak for your whole organization. You brought a smile to my face :)

29 posted on 12/10/2011 10:40:00 AM PST by ez ("Abashed the Devil stood and felt how awful goodness is." - Milton, "Paradise Lost")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

tea party nation eh?

are you being funny or are you really that stupid? I hope to god you know the tea party and the tea party nation are two different things. The tea party nation are a bunch of goddam freaks.


30 posted on 12/10/2011 10:40:31 AM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

G Larry, have you noticed “they” rarely say who they are for? they just attack Newt incessantly. Are they rinos? or just “whinos”?


31 posted on 12/10/2011 10:41:05 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

I listen to his show occaisionally. I know levin does not like newt. I’ve heard him say it.


32 posted on 12/10/2011 10:42:24 AM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

>> newt isn’t worthy of any form of tea party endorsement. If the tea party folks talking like they endorse newt as a tea party candidate, I will have Zero respect for the tea party. >>

Get ready to have zero respect then. A little history lesson for you: the pre cursor to the tea party? It’s called the Contract with America. Author and instigator? Newt Gingrich.

Last balanced budget we had? Passed by Gingrich as Speaker.
Last welfare reform we had? Ditto’s.

For all his flaws, Newt has been deeply involved and indeed central with all of the plusses that the last movement anything like the tea party of today was involved with.

Just sayin.......


33 posted on 12/10/2011 10:43:10 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bwc2221

Yes he is a conservative.


34 posted on 12/10/2011 10:43:19 AM PST by Solson (The Voters stole the election! And the establishment wants it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All; BarnacleCenturion
Sadly there's a lot of misinformation in Rand Paul's article.

Newt's certainly not unapologetically in support of the individual mandate and abandoned the concept just as the Heritage Foundation did. Romney insists it's viable at the state level.

Rand Paul conveniently uses the lower case 'c' conservative on Scozzafava's opponent when he was actually not a Republican but a Conservative Party candidate. It's a slight of hand to make it seem Newt chose a RINO over a conservative Republican candidate rather than supporting the Republican nominee over another party's choice.

Newt has his own responses on the the individual mandate, TARP, lobbying and Freedie Mac, even Scozzafava

35 posted on 12/10/2011 10:43:35 AM PST by newzjunkey (Republicans will find a way to reelect Obama and Speaker Pelosi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

speaking of freaks..put down that mirror


36 posted on 12/10/2011 10:44:02 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

speaking of freaks..put down that mirror


37 posted on 12/10/2011 10:44:30 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bwc2221
I didn't realize Kool-Aid has become the official drink of the Tea Party. Newt Gingrich is many times better than Barack Obama (and I will vote for him if he is the nominee) but big-government loving Newt is no conservative.

My sentiments exactly!

38 posted on 12/10/2011 10:45:09 AM PST by LYONS67 (KEEP THE FAITH, STAND UP AND FIGHT, NEVER QUIT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

Yes. Levin is very forthright about what he does not like about Newt. That being said...he does not intend to crucify our frontrunner who may be able to win against Obama. He actually wants Bachmann and/or Santorum and prefers them. They just have not gotten any traction yet.


39 posted on 12/10/2011 10:45:19 AM PST by sheikdetailfeather ("Kick The Communists Out Of Your Govt. And Don't Accept Their Goodies"-Yuri Bezmenov-KGB Defector)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

If true, then the tea party is a sham, and I am done with it. However, I don’t take anything from you as fact.


40 posted on 12/10/2011 10:45:37 AM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

oh gosh, did I just expose a tea party nation freak on FR?


41 posted on 12/10/2011 10:47:00 AM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
If Newt became president, there is no way to know which Newt would govern. My hope would be that he's had enough time to reflect on his past policy mistakes and that he would focus on and implement those policies that have been shown to work well in the past.

Newt realizes that the time left for the country to change course grows short. He must fight his tendency to get into the weeds by dabbling in grandiose ideas and discussions better suited to a faculty lounge than the oval office.

42 posted on 12/10/2011 10:49:25 AM PST by JPG (Growing old is mandatory; growing up is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Why is it that you pure Newt posters seem to avoid things like talking up Newt’s new book?

You mean the actual published new book, "The Crater" about the Civil War?

No, of course you mean the "rumored" "post election" book on "climate change."

43 posted on 12/10/2011 10:50:36 AM PST by newzjunkey (Republicans will find a way to reelect Obama and Speaker Pelosi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

There are many OTHER Tea Party folks that support Gingrich. A recent poll showed a leaning towards Newt by various members of tea parties. I would imagine that Tea Party Nation endorsed Rand Paul. Rand Paul is trying to present himself as the spokesman for America’s many Tea Parties..he is not. He is no more their spokesperson than Karl Rove is the spokesman for the entire republican party.


44 posted on 12/10/2011 10:51:48 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1
""I want people to go out there and work for who they believe in," says Tea Party Express Chairman Amy Kremer, who says she or any individual shouldn't dictate who people in the movement ought to vote for."

This is funny as all get-out coming from Kremer, who starts running her pie-hole publicly trying to do just that about once a week.
45 posted on 12/10/2011 10:53:12 AM PST by CowboyJay (Generic Republican - 2012. He's the only 'electable' candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

I weep with you-—and pray.


46 posted on 12/10/2011 10:55:06 AM PST by basil (It's time to rid the country of "gun free zones" aka "Killing Fields")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

“Tea Party “LEADERS?” The Tea Party movement has NO LEADERS. We are autonomous.”

EXACTLY! “We the People” are the Tea Party.

Some idiots even try to claim that nutcase Ron Paul is a Tea Party leader while he is neither Tea Party, conservative or GOP.


47 posted on 12/10/2011 10:57:11 AM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption
I can tell you that the vast majority of people in our Tea Party will not vote for Gingrich or Romney or Paul. We want a true Conservative.

So what you are saying is that in your estimation, if Gingrich gets the nom, the tea partiers will vote enmasse for Obama.

Well, like you said, the Tea Party has no leaders. Fortunately, I doubt the real tea partiers will pay any more attention to your drivel than to Rand Paul's.

48 posted on 12/10/2011 10:58:35 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: basil
" I weep with you-—and pray."

That is one hell of a plan.:-(

49 posted on 12/10/2011 10:59:53 AM PST by verity (The Obama Administration is a Criminal Enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: JPG
If Newt became president, there is no way to know which Newt would govern...

Does his laid out agenda not speak for itself?

None if it will matter without a Republican congress since all repeals and new legislation necessarily begins there. That's why he asks people to be "with him, not for him" because it'll be a hard fought struggle, not something a president can do by fiat.

Will he be, at times, mercurial and frustrating? You betcha. Anyone would be. He could be a very good president or he could be unfocused, aimless and pivot so much he wears out his staff. Romney would be feckless, Newt's at least shown to be a fighter.

Ultimately I'm still of a mind to believe Obama wins reelection regardless of the GOP nominee.

50 posted on 12/10/2011 11:00:35 AM PST by newzjunkey (Republicans will find a way to reelect Obama and Speaker Pelosi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson