Posted on 12/13/2011 1:53:29 PM PST by jazusamo
Let’s see lying under oath...nah that ain’t bad enough. lwt’s see if this nut job actually recuses herself from this case since she obviously SHOULD ( no I am not holding my breath)
Kagan Skews so she must recuse.
Smoking-gun ping.
She just recused herself on the SCOTUS Arizona case. With this information released, if she doesn’t recuse herself on Obamacare, she will look like the Obamacare SCOTUS-appointed stooge we always thought she was.
I hear you, they should have gone to the mats to ax her.
Internal DOJ Email: Kagan Was Brought Into Loop on Mark Levin’s Obamacare Complaint
Thanks for linking that!
IMPEACH IMPEACH IMPEACH !
Republican louts in Congress have no courage to fight for Constitutional government. Their nemesis, the progressive Marxists, will die in the effort of Borking a nominee. Clearly there is no hope for constitutional government. If Kagan can be confirmed the vilest tyrant is not far behind.
The party of toopid...thats why.
I'll never forget Lindsay Grahamnesty....saying to Kagan...well, I guess elections have consequences. What a fool, it was obvious in her citing her love for activist judges, she had no intention of following the constitution.
This recusal is nothing more than a ploy. Not to say that she shouldn’t need to recuse herself for reasons the article mentions, she does.
But, how this plays out once the obamacare case rolls around she’ll point back to this case and be able to say that she knows when to recuse herself, isn’t afraid to do it, shows she will when she sees fit, then decline to do so for the obamacare case.
“Why the Sam Hill did the Republicans just roll over and let that piece of excrement get onto SCOTUS in the first place?”
Insider horse trading: Committee chairmanships, bridges to nowhere in their district, a hidden tax on the opposition’s financial support while a tax break is added for their financial support, a better located office, a piece of tail…
What we see reported is the tip of the iceberg. Behind every “reluctantly” given vote was some form of quid pro quo. How many times have we seen alleged mortal enemies yuking it up at some private to-do? We, the great Bible-clinging gun-toters are manipulated like naïve children.
“She just recused herself on the SCOTUS Arizona case.”
Did she? The article I read yesterday, put it in somewhat confusing terms. It seemed to me that she might have recused herself from the decision to take the case, but not the case itself. Hope I’m wrong about that!
LLS
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
If she doesn’t Recuse (and she will not, because that Socialized Medical Care was the big reason she got Nominated), then Congress MUST move to Impeach for Lying Under Oath.
I couldn’t agree more but we know they’ll never even attempt to impeach her. She’s a democRAT and just following Obama and Holder’s lead.
“Did she? The article I read yesterday, put it in somewhat confusing terms. It seemed to me that she might have recused herself from the decision to take the case, but not the case itself. Hope I’m wrong about that!”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I saw that blurb but did not see the article. Do you have a link?
If that turns out to be the case, she will look like an even bigger stooge...and a deceitful stooge at that because she led the press to believe she was recusing herself, without correcting....
BUT, even if she is following orders and her statement was designed to mislead, and she eventually “recinds” her recusal, she has the Obamacare issue and history to answer to.
She may be a Obot dim bulb (by SCOTUS standards), but I hold out hope she doesn’t intend to set out on a SCOTUS career of corruption.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.