Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Don't count Perry out just yet
Washington Examiner ^ | December 14, 2011 | Ken Klukowski, coauthor of “Resurgent: How Constitutional Conservatism Can Save America.”

Posted on 12/14/2011 5:30:22 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

It’s now a three-way race before voting begins for the Republican presidential nomination. as either Newt Gringrich, Mitt Romney, or Rick Perry will be the GOP standard-bearer to challenge President Obama.

The same pundits that have confidently miscalled the GOP race all along are now declaring it’s a two-way race between former Speaker Newt Gingrich and former Governor Mitt Romney.

They’re wrong. Either man might be the nominee, but not necessarily.

Romney is the former frontrunner. He’s educated, polished, and has tremendous private-sector success and some high-level public experience. He even has a picturesque family.

But a majority of Republican primary voters do not support this consummate establishment candidate. He has a record of flip-flopping on issues that should be consistent because they should arise from a personal worldview and set of core principles that usually hold steady throughout a person’s adult life.

Newt is the current frontrunner. He’s brilliant, knowledgeable, articulate, and experienced across a wide spectrum of policy and political issues.

But he has serious weaknesses. There are matters of personal conduct that shock many core Republican primary voters, and policy issues such as previously believing the federal government can impose a healthcare individual mandate or pursue cap-and-trade to more recent issues involving immigration.

There’s also a bombastic tendency, seen in kicking a Middle-East hornet’s nest with the Palestinians, backhanding Paul Ryan’s reform plans, and attacking capitalism by vilifying Romney’s business success.

And Newt tops it off by proposing that instead of three coequal branches in our federal government, Congress and the president should destroy judicial independence by subjugating the federal courts. This would abolish the courts’ power to uphold the Constitution when the political branches violate it (such as with Obamacare).

But there’s no perfect candidate. So all that said, one of them might win the nomination and become the next president of the United States.

However, these flaws are sufficiently serious that there is room for a third candidate to emerge. Romney is stable but has not been able to rise above 25 percent. Gingrich has had a meteoric rise but could misstep and implode just as quickly.

Who could it be? Filing deadlines are past in many states and talk of a brokered convention is fanciful; it’s almost certainly someone currently on the stage.

Jon Huntsman is at low single digits because he’s shown contempt for the GOP base and he’s about as exciting as reading the Economist, so it won’t be him. And despite the thrill at rebelling against the machine that drives so many people—especially young people—to support Ron Paul, he might be the only literally unelectable Republican in the field.

That leaves three. Of them, Rick Santorum has tremendous policy expertise. Michele Bachmann is short on public experience, but has a great personal story and private-sector experience.

But they don’t have money or organization. Even a surprise win in Iowa—which won’t happen—wouldn’t bring money in fast enough to build a national team and saturate the media markets in the other January contests.

Which leaves Governor Perry. A long-serving governor of America’s second-largest state, Perry has executive experience and an almost-perfect record on economic, social, and national-security issues. Three of the best lines from the last debate were his—seeing the big picture on Newt’s Palestinian comments, knowing Obama should have recovered or destroyed our stealth drone, and declaring that securing the borders will change the national mood enough to discuss long-term immigration reform.

Moreover, he has tons of campaign cash and a large organization. And coupled with pushing for a flat tax and Balanced Budget Amendment, his support for guns, marriage, and faith will help in Iowa and South Carolina.

If Romney or Gingrich falter, Perry might take it all.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: amnesty; desperation; dreaming; gopprimary; heartless; iowa; mittromney; moron; newtgingrich; openborders; perry; perry2012; perryastroturfing; rickperry; rino; tuition4illegals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

1 posted on 12/14/2011 5:30:26 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I’m not counting anyone out until somebody actually casts a vote. :)


2 posted on 12/14/2011 5:32:03 AM PST by ez ("Abashed the Devil stood and felt how awful goodness is." - Milton, "Paradise Lost")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All; shield
Perry: Uproot and Overhaul Washington

The Perry Plan: Energizing American Jobs and Security

The Perry Economic Plan: Cut, Balance and Grow

Texas, Austin exception to gloomy retail picture

Texas Debt Clock

The Truth Cannot Be Bought [1:02] Rick Perry

3 posted on 12/14/2011 5:32:49 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Why am I hearing Little Orphan Annie singing that “Tomorrow” song?
4 posted on 12/14/2011 5:34:48 AM PST by Happy Rain ("Having A Communist Joke In The White House Takes Graveyard Humor To New Heights.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ez
I’m not counting anyone out until somebody actually casts a vote. :)

It's very exciting and much, much better than all the "The year in review" stories we hate in those years w/o presidential elections.

And this election means we will be voting in a new president next year!

5 posted on 12/14/2011 5:39:47 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I know debates aren’t everything. And unlike popular opinion, they certainly don’t show or hide intelligence. But man, Perry’s debate performances overall are horrible. The reason this really bothers me is I see a George Bush like performance against Obama in debates and I’m not sure that’s going to cut it to win the Presidency. We need someone who’s going to take it to Obama!! I don’t know that Perry can do that face to face or even on the stump.


6 posted on 12/14/2011 5:40:46 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I never counted Perry out. My opinion is that the only person standing in the way of Romney is Perry. Early on I thought Pawlenty (before Perry declared) might be the Romney stopper, but he never got traction.

Newt’s going to peter out just as Cain did. Once the DBM starts piling on, he won’t be able to surface for air.

If the Gingrich voters go to Perry, Romney can be stopped.

Many have not given Perry a second or third look because he is not “golden tongued”. To those people, I say pick your poison. Perry or Romney.

Disclosure: I’m not crazy about any of the candidates, but will not sit this one out. I’ll pick the most conservative one I believe can beat Obama. Wish Gov. McDonnell or Sen. DeMint were running.


7 posted on 12/14/2011 5:45:59 AM PST by randita (If you supported Palin, there's no way you can support Newt. They don't agree on much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

I know it’s become common practice to repeat the MSM line but Rick Perry has delivered some good comments (and some clunkers) in the debates and as mentioned in the article the last one was great.

As to his town halls and stumping — he’s renowned for it. He is known as a superb retail politics campaigner.

Here is an article and an interactive map with his next 2 week schedule in Iowa.

http://www.texastribune.org/texas-politics/2012-presidential-election/perry-ground-game-old-fashioned-bus-tour/


8 posted on 12/14/2011 5:49:01 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; RoosterRedux; jonrick46; deepbluesea; RockinRight; TexMom7; potlatch; ...
Perry Ping....

IF you'd rather NOT be pinged FReepmail me.

IF you'd like to be added FReepmail me. Thanks.

*****************************************************************************************************************************************************


9 posted on 12/14/2011 5:49:24 AM PST by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

Thank you for the comments.

“Drudge,” who is friends with Mitt Romney’s campaign manager, has Ron Paul as his lead picture and story. The Romney camp needs Paul to do well and diminish Gingrich going into NH. But giving Paul anymore traction improves chances he’ll mount a 3rd party run. Enter Obama-2.

With voters moving to Perry it will be a new election (no-Romney).

No Obama.

10th Amendment President Perry.


10 posted on 12/14/2011 5:56:01 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks shield.


11 posted on 12/14/2011 5:59:28 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Merry Christmas, Happy New Year! May 2013 be even Happier!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

So, how does Perry, running at 7.2% against Newt, at 33.4% and Romney still stuck at 22%, with Bachmann and Paul sitting ahead of him, make you think that Perry even has a remote chance?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/republican_presidential_nomination-1452.html


12 posted on 12/14/2011 6:02:35 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain
LOL! I was thinking more like Shirley Temple singing “Animal Crackers”. Talk about delusion?
13 posted on 12/14/2011 6:05:20 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
My main problem with Perry is that listening to his debate performances is like getting a tooth pulled, it's painful. He seems to have a difficult time stitching two coherent sentences together. Heck, he's so bad even George W. Bush seems like Shakespeare by comparison. I just don't see how he could successfully debate Obama if he can't even manage to put in a competent debate performance against his fellow Republicans.
14 posted on 12/14/2011 6:07:36 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apillar

I must have been watching a different debate than you were.

Perry shined.


15 posted on 12/14/2011 6:20:22 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ez

“If Romney or Gingrich falter, Perry might take it all.”

Gentlemen, start your faltering. For your country.
 

 

 


16 posted on 12/14/2011 6:21:37 AM PST by FryingPan101 (Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I like primary season gives every one a chance to become involved. Your enthusiasm is impressive. I will not vote for Perry in the primary but I am ABO in the general. I am currently leaning towards Santorum


17 posted on 12/14/2011 6:38:49 AM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apillar

What is there to debate?

Obama sucks.

Film at 11. [tape delayed to 11:45]


18 posted on 12/14/2011 6:39:09 AM PST by bigoil (Study Thy Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: randita
What people have to ask themselves is: if elected, what candidate would be most likely to do the right thing conservative-wise? Between the three (Perry,Romney, Gingrich), I'd say Perry is easily the one most likely to hold firm to conservative principles. I don't condemn anyone for changing a past position i.e. flipflopping if the change is based on conviction and not simply political expediency.

That's my question about Gingrich. He's made a lot of counter-conservative statements in the past i.e. AGW, and now supposedly rejects them. Is he serious about his changes? Perry certainly hasn't distinguished himself with his public speaking during this campaign, but I'll bet he's the most solid conservative with a proven track record.

19 posted on 12/14/2011 6:53:49 AM PST by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: randita
What people have to ask themselves is: if elected, what candidate would be most likely to do the right thing conservative-wise? Between the three (Perry,Romney, Gingrich), I'd say Perry is easily the one most likely to hold firm to conservative principles. I don't condemn anyone for changing a past position i.e. flipflopping if the change is based on conviction and not simply political expediency.

That's my question about Gingrich. He's made a lot of counter-conservative statements in the past i.e. AGW, and now supposedly rejects them. Is he serious about his changes? Perry certainly hasn't distinguished himself with his public speaking during this campaign, but I'll bet he's the most solid conservative with a proven track record.

20 posted on 12/14/2011 6:55:42 AM PST by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson