Skip to comments.Ron Paul Rising
Posted on 12/14/2011 10:42:04 AM PST by JosephMama
The race for the Republican nomination may be coming down to Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney, but in the contest for the Iowa caucuses, their high-profile battle might still turn out to be a sideshow. The national party has spent the last two weeks resigning itself to a choice between the former speaker and the former Massachusetts governor. But Iowa Republicans may end up choosing between Gingrich and Representative Ron Paul.
In every post-Thanksgiving poll but one, Paul has been neck and neck for second place in Iowa. In most of them, he has lagged well behind the soaring speaker, coming in just below 20 percent while Gingrich hovers around 30. But a new Iowa survey, from Public Policy Polling, shows Gingrich leading Paul by just a single point, 22 percent to 21.
Moreover, the caucuses are not won by opinion polls alone. Theyre won by the politician who can pack Iowas churches, libraries and community centers at 7 p.m. exactly on a frigid January Tuesday, and whose supporters wont suddenly decide to back a different candidate during an hours worth of jawing, dealing and very public voting.
(Excerpt) Read more at campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com ...
More proof that the Obama media and polling continue their promotion of the useful idiot Paul. As long as he has value in polluting the GOP primary process with his kook libertarianism, they will pump him up with garbage polls.
When they are done they will roll out his vile loony newsletters to undermine him.
seriously, if Ron Paul wins Iowa (which I don’t think he will) then Iowa should be stripped of it first in the nation status, because they will have made themselves the laughingstock of the US.
“Just think of what happened after 9/11. Immediately before there was any assessment there was glee in the administration because now we can invade Iraq,” Ron Paul Dec 8, 2011
The Democrats have to do something.
How does an OWS sympathizer, anti- Semitic, anti defense of America ear mark king of congress have any traction at all.
The man is delusion and his supporters are as well.
Journalists (Sarah Palin being a notable exception at the University of Idaho, a school that's probably not run by commies) are liars and will do anything to advance their communist and homosexual agendas. They are taught in J-School to hate America and to place stories to dismantle our legacy of Conservative values.
Well, they are ‘high’
Just like a bad moon.
I’ve heard Sarah say some very nice things about Ron.
Paul could only rise in the Dracula sense. Where’s a good stake when you need one? Medium well done please.
I believe the Ron Paul vile, sick, wacky newsletters are informative.
I believe the Ron Paul blaming of the US for 9/11 is informative.
I believe the Ron Paul support of the OWS parasites is informative.
I believe the idiotic Ron Paul comments about Iran and North Korea is informative.
I believe a good look at the bulk of his cult is informative.
I believe Ron Paul frequenting nutcase conspiracy shows is informative.
I think that both Iowa and New Hampshire should have been stripped of their leadoff positions long ago. In particular, Iowa has a pernicious record of progressive populism dating back decades. This is the state that brought us Henry Wallace, a commie and Hussein Obama, yet another commie.
Personally, I advocate that Tennessee and then Oklahoma ought to displace Iowa and New Hampshire. Both states have a track record of sanity and Conservatism. And they are small enough so that an inordinate amount of money need not be spent to reach the voters. I think that the people of both Tennessee and Oklahoma are much more in touch with authentic American values than either of the two present states leading off the primaries.
Trust me, although I do have some praise for the man, he is by no means my first choice....he’s already gone.
I’m just so frustrated with Newt and Mitt.
So many great repubs out there, but they seem to be afraid of the media. Or they’re just biding their time for the 2016 election.
I cannot handle another 4 more years of what’s going on in this country.
I totally agree. I hate the primary process all together. My vote in GA is totally irrelevant even in the nomination process.
What are the cons to having all the primaries on one day? Then having run offs between the top 2 or 3...
That's just the always kind-hearted Sarah Palin being gracious and choosing her words carefully. Here in the venue of Free Republic, we can embrace the words of our leader:
"Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07.
I could live with either of those states leading things off, but I suspect many would object to another southern state being frontloaded.
Maybe another midwest state ... like... wyoming, nebraska, or kansas?
You forgot Ron Paul supports legalizing drugs and prostitution.
This alone marks him off my books.
From my perspective, a single "Super Primary" has the drawback of candidates focusing attention solely on the three large states of California, Texas and New York. It takes a massive amount of dollars to make the media buys in big markets. It also dilutes retail politics at the person-to-person level.
The present system has worked reasonably well up until the time that Iowa and New Hampshire moved to the left. The more I mull this over, launching the Republican Primary in Tennessee and Oklahoma (as I advocated a few posts back) looks like a reasonable solution. Oklahoma is a clear choice because not one county went for Obama in 2008. Although Tennessee did give us the despicable Al Gore, the fact that he was soundly rejected in 2000 shows that folks in the Volunteer State are right-thinking.
My first choice and second choice are gone too. I will never vote for Ron Paul. He is NOT GOP. He is NOT conservative. He is NOT Tea Party. He is a libertarian, and a kook one at that. A back to back of nation destroyers, Obama then Paul would do the final destruction of the nation.
I kind of like NH having a big say in the process since they’re surrounded by blue states. Ya need to know your enemy.
But Iowa just seems sorta pointless. Especially with the caucus style format. Everyone in your neighborhood knows how you voted. Too commie for me...
You forgot Ron Paul supports legalizing drugs and prostitution.
This alone marks him off my books.
You just don’t want us to have any fun.
But Newt is a Bush clone! He’ll never get elected.
I’m afraid what I see happening is 0 getting reelected.
The pubs will take the Senate. That way come 2016 it will be a landslide election for the red states.
I see you point but a case could be made that Oklahoma is a Midwestern state. Heck, it's got a suburb of OKC named Midwest City! :-)
Although I still like Tennessee and then Oklahoma, if I ran things, I'd be willing to alter it to Tennessee and Kansas. There's regional balance there and a good mixture of country, suburban and city voters.
If he flipped his position on dope smoking, a lot of his support would bail.
Not a big RP person, but I’d hardly say the media’s treatment of Ron Paul has been anything approaching promotion. If the media promoted his economic (well, everything besides his wacky foriegn policy) views, that would be a better day for America, indeed.
In 1996, Speaker Gingrich supported a Democrat-turned-Republican in the Republican House primary won by Ron Paul, who then defeated Democrat opposition in 1996-2010. The two are not friendly.
The media puking out liberal-based garbage polls as if they are fact “promotes” Ron Paul. The average person who pays attention to the liberal media these days don’t read anything further than the NY Times “Ron Paul Rising” headline.
seriously, if Ron Paul wins Iowa (which I dont think he will) then Iowa should be stripped of it first in the nation status, because they will have made themselves the laughingstock of the US.
With modern communications, I question the whole concept of staggered primaries. Even if there are good reasons for the staggered dates, the states should be rotated. Loaded dice, working as intended.
Yeah, but up to now, we’d been promised that it wouldn’t start.
It has started.
Iowa caucuses are coming. Beware of paulbot n00bs posting crap Ross Douthat articles from the Slimes.
Jim has done an exemplary job of zotting several over the past weekend, some even from the classes of '98 and '99.
And 'gunner's graphic ....
We better hope it ends just as fast then...
Ron Paul sees no problem with any of this. He sees no problem if those radical regimes acquire nuclear weapons or biological weapons or other exotic weapons. After all, that's their decision according to the crackpot "non-interventionist" Dr. Demento. If we would just be nice to them, realize how very lovable the Islamonazis truly are and sell them whatever they want to buy (nuclear boomer subs, ICBMs, efficient modern breeder reactors, centrifuges, uranium, plutonium, or whatever) they will certainly love us!!!
Until they annihilate us and our Israeli and British allies, that is.
Providing NATO support just means having to consult and satisfy a wide variety of allies (some of whom may as well be playing for the other team), leading to strategic leaks to the enemy and limitation of goals as in Gulf War I. Enough! Unilateral action is the only way we should go to war from now on. If other nations want to join in, it must be on our terms. We executed Julius and Ethel Rosenberg for less back when America had a backbone. Granted that the Rosenbergs served far more capable masters.
The idea that the Iranian people will revolt and overthrow Ahmadinijad and the mullahs is a nice bedtime story but don't hold your breath waiting for it to happen. And it won't happen with Zippy the Pinhead being granted "letters of marque and reprisal" by a President Demento either, not even if he grants them blunderbusses as weapons and rowboats for transAtlantic travel and bicycles built for two for troop transport on land.
My fiancee’ just got a really nasty negative ad from Ron Paul regarding Newt. He sent back an unrepeatable answer to them. We also just found out Paul is advertising his spew on a neo nazi hate site stormfront.org. Real good Ron you crazy bedbug.
Ron Paul Goes Full Metal Truther
"And its just think of what happened after 9/11. Immediately, before there was any assessment, there was glee in the administration because now we can invade Iraq. So the war drums beat " - Ron Paul
Just a few examples from the article...
REP. PAUL: I vote against it, so I don't endorse the system.
MR. RUSSERT: But when it passes overwhelmingly, you take the money back home.
REP. PAUL: I don't take it. That's the system.
I think you credit the polls with too much power and I don't think they're garbage. Something's happening in Iowa. I don't necessarily agree with it, but pretending it's a liberal media conspiracy will blow up in our faces in a couple days if Paul does as well as all the polls indicate.
Something is shifting.
When I see left-wing polls advertised by the likes of NY Times giving that nutcase Paul those kinds of numbers, I smell a rat.
They should have had their status stripped 4 years ago for starting Obama on his road to the White House.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.