Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Revealed: huge increase in executive pay for America's top bosses
The Guardian ^ | Wednesday 14 December 2011 13.55 EST | Dominic Rushe in New York

Posted on 12/15/2011 4:48:26 AM PST by TSgt

Exclusive survey shows America's CEOs enjoyed pay hikes of up to 40% last year – with one chief executive earning $145m

Chief executive pay has roared back after two years of stagnation and decline. America's top bosses enjoyed pay hikes of between 27 and 40% last year, according to the largest survey of US CEO pay. The dramatic bounceback comes as the latest government figures show wages for the majority of Americans are failing to keep up with inflation.

America's highest paid executive took home more than $145.2m, and as stock prices recovered across the board, the median value of bosses' profits on stock options rose 70% in 2010, from $950,400 to $1.3m. The news comes against the backdrop of an Occupy Wall Street movement that has focused Washington's attention on the pay packages of America's highest paid.

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
I don't believe in class warfare nor do I want the government setting wages however I do believe that in many cases executive compensation is egregious.

Ronald Williams, former head of Aetna, a health insurer, exercised 2.4m options for a profit of $50.4m. Aetna's stock price declined by 70% from when Williams assumed the role of CEO in February 2006 until his retirement. At pharmacy chain CVS, Thomas Ryan made a $28m profit on his options. During Ryan's 13-year tenure as CEO, CVS Caremark's stock price decreased almost 54%.
1 posted on 12/15/2011 4:48:30 AM PST by TSgt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TSgt

If the board of directors think that is what they are worth then it’s nobodies’ damn business!

Capitalism warts and all is still ten zillion times better than anything else.


2 posted on 12/15/2011 4:52:02 AM PST by Happy Rain ("Having A Communist Joke In The White House Takes Graveyard Humor To New Heights.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TSgt

I like how some companies do it.

They require the CEO to heavily invest in their company, so if the company goes down, so does the CEO.


3 posted on 12/15/2011 4:52:54 AM PST by Jonty30 (If a person won't learn under the best of times, then he must learn under the worst of times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

That sounds nice until you consider the incestuous nature of corporate boards.

I’ll agree it’s better than anything else but they don’t do themselves any favors.


4 posted on 12/15/2011 4:55:09 AM PST by TSgt (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TSgt

Good, and I hope they give them the biggest, fastest corporate jets possible.

Not a sarcasm. I want our companies to be the richest and most powerful in the world, headed by the best CEO’s money can buy.


5 posted on 12/15/2011 4:56:19 AM PST by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain
It is my damn business when they stick their hands in my pocket with tarp. Those bastard deserve a bonus, jail.
6 posted on 12/15/2011 4:57:05 AM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Newt, Willard, Perry and his fellow supporters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

Unfortunately, the companies aren’t paying what they think a CEO is worth. It’s now become a rigged game, where you have inter-connected CEO’s sitting on each other’s boards guarenteeing out of control wages to each other, regardless of a companies performance or whether a company can even afford to pay it out.

If the CEO’s for their interest destroy a company, they just move on to the next one.

Just like John Corzine.


7 posted on 12/15/2011 4:58:06 AM PST by Jonty30 (If a person won't learn under the best of times, then he must learn under the worst of times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TSgt

Why don’t you tell us how much you earn so we can determine whether we BELIEVE it’s egregious. If you can’t prove CEO salaries are detrimental to the economy, then you are merely showing jealousy.


8 posted on 12/15/2011 5:00:00 AM PST by 1raider1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TSgt

The boards are “incestuous” as you put it, because the directors are the biggest stockholders, meaning in essence they own the companies in large part.

Investors can choose to get involved in the companies or not. We are not getting a basic course in economic realiy from these headlines.


9 posted on 12/15/2011 5:00:15 AM PST by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Williams

If it worked, I’d be fine with it too.

But it’s not working any longer. Would you really say that American companies are out-performing the rest of the world?


10 posted on 12/15/2011 5:00:38 AM PST by Jonty30 (If a person won't learn under the best of times, then he must learn under the worst of times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TSgt
It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.

-Thomas Sowell

11 posted on 12/15/2011 5:02:26 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TSgt
Meanwhile.....

While the Middle Class Suffers, Congress is Getting Richer – With Help From Legal Insider Trading

12 posted on 12/15/2011 5:04:36 AM PST by mewzilla (Santelli 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1raider1

Well, I’m in the upper tax brackets but it’s under a million. ;-) I’m not jealous at all, I have a very nice income and lifestyle.

My concern is the uneven balance which fosters social unrest and the fact that they simply are worth what they are paid especially when the drive a company into the ground.

I’ve worked with many C-Suite types and know from personal experience that most aren’t worth what they are paid.


13 posted on 12/15/2011 5:04:47 AM PST by TSgt (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Those bastard deserve a bonus, jail.

Please tell us what laws that you can prove were broken by corporate CEOs.

14 posted on 12/15/2011 5:05:11 AM PST by 1raider1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

If the CEO’s “destroy a company” the “next one” will profit as a result.

All of this discussion is ass backward. Just like the corporate jet issue. I don’t want the CEO of Ford showing up to meet, say, the Japanese Prime Minister, after booking a coach flight on Southwest Airlines. I want him to say “be right there” and then arrive in something taht looks like Queen Amidala’s spaceship.

Our companies, CEO’s and people should be the richest in the world. Making our CEO’s be humble is like playng no winner softball games. It will not produce Babe Ruth.


15 posted on 12/15/2011 5:05:52 AM PST by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

I wish the media would do more stories on “rich” politicians especially those like Reid who made is riches as a Senator.

As Rush would say, HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!


16 posted on 12/15/2011 5:06:44 AM PST by TSgt (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Williams

I have no issues with corporate jets. They are a corporate asset.


17 posted on 12/15/2011 5:07:51 AM PST by TSgt (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Williams

If a CEO runs a company into the ground, I cannot expect him to know how to run a company profitably, but he’ll still make millions of dollars destroying companies.


18 posted on 12/15/2011 5:13:45 AM PST by Jonty30 (If a person won't learn under the best of times, then he must learn under the worst of times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TSgt

This is more agenda driven science. These numbers are likely cherry picked to bolster the Occucommies.

Pray for America


19 posted on 12/15/2011 5:15:06 AM PST by bray (Hope and Change to Hate and Anger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
In those cases the incompetent shareholders are ultimately to blame as are the incompetent voters who put Obama in the White House are ultimately to blame for the mess we are in.

Do you suggest we “regulate” both Capitalism AND the US Constitution in order to "fix" these problems?

20 posted on 12/15/2011 5:18:08 AM PST by Happy Rain ("Having A Communist Joke In The White House Takes Graveyard Humor To New Heights.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson