Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Department: Arizona Sheriff Arpaio violated federal law
The Washington Times ^ | December 15, 2011 | Jerry Seper

Posted on 12/15/2011 11:40:17 AM PST by markomalley

The Justice Department, following an often hostile three-year investigation, said Thursday the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office (MCSO) in Phoenix under the leadership of Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio violated federal law and the Constitution in its handling of persons arrested and inmates held in its jail system.

Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez, who heads the department’s Civil Rights Division, said investigators concluded there was reasonable cause to believe that sheriff’s deputies engaged in a pattern or practice of unconstitutional conduct and violations of federal law that jeopardized the agency’s commitment to fair and effective law enforcement.

The not-unexpected decision said investigators found discriminatory policing practices including unlawful stops, detentions and arrests of Latinos; unlawful retaliation against persons exercising their First Amendment right to criticize the agency’s policies or practices, including its discriminatory treatment of Latinos; and discriminatory jail practices against Latino inmates with limited English proficiency by punishing them and denying them critical services.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: aliens; arpaio; civilrights; civilrightsdivision; doj; ericholder; holder; joearpaio; naturalborncitizen; profiling; sheriffjoe; thomaseperez
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: Future Useless Eater

I believe Arapaio could have proof in black and white, sure proof—,indisputable ,incontravertible, no way on Gods green earth copuld anyone deny it , and it will simply be made to dissappear.

We are not going to get Obama out of the White House in any manner other than to vote him out, and even after the world see’s Arapaio’s undeniable proof that he is an illegal President he may win the next election.Almost 50% of Americans want this load in the White House to continue to destroy our country.


41 posted on 12/15/2011 12:56:35 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“While no formal findings of pattern or practice violations have been made...”

Wow, what a worm. In other words, “nobody broke any law, so we are going to curse at you and *suggest* that you did a whole bunch of *subjectively* bad things. And then we will take you to court and hope a judge agrees to require you to comply with our ever changing, nebulous and whimsical wish list of what we want you to do.”

Which is total ca-ca. Sheriff Joe would be insane to agree to such nonsense. It would be like requiring a high school teacher to have a half dozen adult federal employees in his class, criticizing and arguing with everything he says right after he says it. Teaching would grind to a halt.


42 posted on 12/15/2011 1:02:01 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; ..
Ping!

Click the keyword Aliens to see more illegal alien, border security, and other related threads.

43 posted on 12/15/2011 1:09:58 PM PST by HiJinx (I can see Mexico from my back porch...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

:: In my opinion, Arpaio shouldn’t wait until February ::

I wondered why he would not go with it sooner but, then, I read somewhere that the drop dead date for filing for the bulk of primaries is around February 14.

If Obamugabe is all in on the 14th and no challenger, Joe hits him on the 15th showing he’s ineligible, then what do the Dhimmicrats do?


44 posted on 12/15/2011 1:13:51 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
While no formal findings of pattern or practice violations have been made, Mr. Perez said the investigation remains ongoing.

Perez needs another three years and a few million more dollars.

45 posted on 12/15/2011 1:16:28 PM PST by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Article, then see important comments; begin at # 2 , through # 42.

Thanks FutureUE.

46 posted on 12/15/2011 1:16:55 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The DOJ just cannot accept the fact that Sheriff Joe does not give a rat’s bazoo what they think. He’s a duly elected sheriff of the sovereign state of Arizona and there really isn’t much they can do to him. Its driving them nuts.


47 posted on 12/15/2011 1:18:25 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

Put me on the jury.


48 posted on 12/15/2011 1:31:34 PM PST by SwinneySwitch (Mexico - beyond your expectations!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

“...what do the Dhimmicrats do?”

The Democrats will ignore whatever Arpaio discovers.

As one liberal yahoo at another site posited, possession is 9/10ths of the law, and BHO2 is already in the White House. The attitude of Democrats is basically, “drop dead!”

We now have a federal fascist state, and it happened right in front of us.


49 posted on 12/15/2011 1:40:18 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS U.S.A. PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
"Well, if that’s Arpaio’s big sin, then mObama must be in very serious trouble, since he swore to abide by Article IV Section IV of the United States Constitution."

“The president shall protect the states from invasion.”

Not to mention:

Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

50 posted on 12/15/2011 1:54:38 PM PST by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Godebert

Oh yes, nice. Exactly right. I sure don’t want to short change mObama.


51 posted on 12/15/2011 1:56:49 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Why back in '88, Conservatives backed Gore in Texas. What Reagan revolution? What laegacy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I think we can safely say that Arpaio has stirred up the proverbial “hornet’s nest” with his birther investigation. Suddenly, Arpaio is public enemey #1.


52 posted on 12/15/2011 2:05:04 PM PST by visually_augmented (I was blind, but now I see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater

“Justice Department: Arizona Sheriff Arpaio violated federal law”

Yeah....looking into Bammy’s paper’s is a violation of Federal Law now....


53 posted on 12/15/2011 2:08:07 PM PST by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I’ve read two articles on this and have yet to see a citation of WHICH Federal law was violated.


54 posted on 12/15/2011 2:19:04 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater
Arpaio has implied that Obama may not even (still) be a U.S. citizen. that would also take time to confirm through official channels.

That would require proving a negative....just sayin. I said this back in '08 that he was a British subject, and now we even have people in the UK saying he is still a British subject. Can the UK extradite this guy?

55 posted on 12/15/2011 2:21:42 PM PST by GregNH (One Pissed Off Natural Born Citizen OPONBC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Never mind. I see it's Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.

In other words, if the current Federal government believe an entity is discriminating...and that discrimination is below the threshold that could be prosecuted as a crime, or even in civil court, they can deny Federal Funds to said agency.

Any DOJ under any administration could use this tools to cut off any agency from free Federal money.

Nothing to see here.

56 posted on 12/15/2011 2:24:57 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater
There is a Youtube video that has the woman suing in Hawaii for birth records pertaining Joe some papers.
57 posted on 12/15/2011 2:27:07 PM PST by mountainlion (I am voting for Sarah after getting screwed again by the DC Thugs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

Me too!!!

Talk about your jury nullification!!


58 posted on 12/15/2011 2:45:42 PM PST by HiJinx (I can see Mexico from my back porch...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man; LucyT; molson209; markomalley; GregNH
“While no formal findings of pattern or practice violations have been made, Mr. Perez said the investigation remains ongoing.”

DOJ has been after Obama with this specific ACLU complaint since March 2009. But Perez still has “no formal findings or pattern or practice violations” so Perez and DOJ have nothing they can charge Arpaio with, yet.

So “the investigation remains ongoing”...meaning the timing of this “announcement” of nothing is very suspicious and points towards it being yet another “don't go there” directed at Arpaio’s eligibility posse, IMO.

59 posted on 12/15/2011 3:17:38 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: markomalley


60 posted on 12/15/2011 3:18:08 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson