Posted on 12/17/2011 12:08:08 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Romney, by virtue of his lack of contrast with 0bama, is probably the weakest GOP candidate who could be nominated in 2012. The resultant de-energizing which would consequently occur within the TEA party base would be a critical factor in the general election, quite possibly tipping the situation in 0bama's favor.
Absolutely agree! No matter if he is the last man standing, do NOT endorse him. NEVAH! Do what you want on election day, and do whats best for the country, but there should be NO endorsement for Romney by the Tea party.
When a storm is on the way, some folks shake in fear and speak of their impending doom. Others stand strong, look into the eye of the storm and... learn to dance in the rain.
We, together, will get through this storm.
President Newt Gingrich.... fight FOR it, it’s going to happen.
Newt has disclosed all that he needs to about Freddie/Fannie.
GO NEWT GO.......
Newt-Romney, Mitt-Gingrich....six of one, half a dozen of the other.....both of these butterballs occupy the same freezer bin. Do either of those birds have the guts to cut government in half? Because that is what the math says is necessary. I seriously doubt it.
Check this out Jim.
I agree with that assessment 100 percent.
AMEN BRother FReep!!!!!!!!
This guy will stay home. No way will I do it! He is the only guy that makes me stay home. I have been an election judge for the past elections. If he is the guy, find someone else.
You have been here far too long to risk zotting by pimping Romney. I hope that you see the light before you, uh....see the “light.”
Our Founding Fathers would have started shooting by now. Hell, they would have been finished by now!
I cannot vote for such a liberal as Mitt Romney who is anti-life, anti-gun, anti-natural marriage, and anti-small government.
There is nothing in that that is any better than Obama.
Therefore, I will vote write-in (Palin) or 3rd Party (Constitution) depending on which looks like the better choice.
Ethically, I cannot support Romney. I can support trying to start a conservative party or support an existing conservative party that has nominated a real candidate.
Thanks, Jim! My pet Romney peeve is that he’s a pandering liar. Pays for an NRA Life Membership, gets his picture taken at Shot Show with LaPierre, announces that he’s a lifelong hunter and gun owner, all in a two week span. Except that he’s not a hunter, and, well, does not nor ever has owned a gun.
You are not in our camp. Go away. When it comes time for us to bring arm’s you will be pissing your pant’s.
If Obama gets another term you better be stocked up. It is about to get ugly.
Romneybot Zot.
Thanks for this thread Jim.
______________
Romney is just another throw-back RINO who wants to “go along to get along.” (Everything will be just fine as long as we continue to cave-in to the left as the left continues to move to the left, until there is nothing left of America.) Time and events have passed him by, as well as the 24 % of Republicans who still believe that America is back in the “I Like Ike” Era.
Romney and his supporters do not realize that the US Federal Government is in the early stage of a terminal financial death spiral. The “can cannot be kicked down the road” anymore, because the “road” ended when our Total National Debt exceeded 15 TRILLION dollars.
Those of us in the 53 % that pay personal FIT and who are TAXED ENOUGH ALREADY know that ANY Federal Politician who does not reduce the US FEDERAL Government baseline spending is, to use the frog in the pot of water analogy, turning up the heat under the pot that we, the former “Silent Majority” and are now the TEA Party, politely float in.
Romney is one who will “turn up the heat on our pot of nearly boiling water.”
________________________
To borrow a quote from the flag-page of a VERY wise FReeper:
- When my country, into which I had just set my foot, was set on fire about my ears, it was time to stir. It was time for every man to stir.
Thomas Paine, Common Sense US patriot & political philosopher (1737 - 1809) - - -
____________________________
With Paines quote in mind, let us examine ourselves a bit.
Do we sit politely on our hands and let the counter-culture manipulate us?
If so, do we even recognize that we are being manipulated?
In my humble, but ALWAYS correct opinion, manipulation by the counter-culture is done by the following:
Racial profiling; Freedom from Religion; The American Civil Liberties Destruction Union (ACLDU); charge of being a Right-Wing Extremist, Right-Wing Hypocrite, Right-Wing Millionaire, Right-Wing Businessman, etc.; and of course, that all inclusive violation of the non-existant, (thank you Reagan for your timely veto), Fairness Doctrine.
Feel free to add to this manipulation list, as it is high time for us to shed the self-imposed tolerance of the shackles that keep us from living up to the standards that our Founding Fathers fought so hard to set in place for us, the polite frogs that just float around in the almost boiling pot of hot water.
That is not accurate.
I see two possible and radically different scenarios in the debates:
1) Despite the slanted questions and format, the short, fat wrinkly dude skewers The One in the debates and somehow wins the hearts of enough American people to win, or
2) With the help of his MSM organization, The One gets the questions that lets him show his best side, parries Gingrich's attacks, counters effectively with carefully orchestrated attacks of his own, and is left looking like the slender "cool" guy against a fat old wrinkly guy.
What can we do? Pray hard and hope for the best. Maybe somehow yell PALIN!!! hard enough to change her mind. That's about all I can think of right now.
Dude. Chill. You don’t get to determine who is ZOTTED. The guy expressed an opinion, and Jim Robinson himself responded with a reasonable, respectful yet unapologetic answer.
Jim is pretty good at figuring out who is a blatant RINO and who is a conservative with an alternative point of view, trying to find a way to keep Hussein from staying in power...which is one reason to thank the man for FR.
“If people get ZOT’d merely for expressing a different opinion, you don’t have to ZOT me. I’m outta here.”
Newt, with all his flaws and imperfect record, is more conservative than Ann Coulter. Personally, I’m sick of her being quoted and posted here on FR. Were it up to me, anything linked to her would be zotted, and anyone peddling the harlot would be zotted as well.
I am a social/moral conservative...and even I can see that Newt, overall, is the only real choice left to us.
You are fortunate that Mr. Robinson is more forebearant than myself. For supporting “Ann Coulter” is equivalent to supporting Mitt Romney.
I’ll say this for Noot:
He’s no wimp, and if presented with an improper debate question, he’ll change it to a proper one, and answer that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.