Skip to comments.Washington DC Council Candidate Arrested for prostitution.
Posted on 12/17/2011 4:34:00 PM PST by hotdogjones
DC council Candidate Kevin B. Chavous was busted in a prostitution sting.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
OH NO YOU DI'INT!
Butch Set Him Up.
Oh. He’s a shoe in now. A resume enhancer!
The DC government is just full of optimal human beings ain’t it?
for a second, I thought the candidate was the prostitute. lol
I first read the headline as ‘ring’ & thought, “Democrat.”
Then I realized it said sting & thought, “Republican.”
Still, it’s DC. Do they have Republicans there?
Street walker pick up attempt. Fool.
good teeth: not guilty.
Headline sure sounds funny.
Add a little cocaine to the bust and the job is his, and Mayor right after that.
Oh Man, this is too funny. LMAO
Of course he denies the Charges, why not, with a DC jury and a slick lawyer he will probably be found innocent.
North capitol and K sts. Church’s and schools on two of the corners. Not the place you would expect to find a male prostitute looking for Chicken Hawkers.
Street walker pick up attempt. Fool.
Is that really how it happened? I thought these high powered DC folks had their own “escorts” that they could “rent” for a night. Asking a hooker off the street is unusual for these government officials especially in DC. I certainly hope the guy had to rent off the street cuz he could not afford what the politicians are offered.
Buying or selling? Was Barney Frank in the room upstairs?
This guy may have aspirations for high office.....and given the slap-happy predilection of DC voters, he may just attain his political goals by stepping gayly into the moral vacuum that Barry left.
One thing for sure...you will see many liberals running for office as republicans in this next election.
A man spending money for a prostitute is probably the stupidest waste of money imaginable.
The founders had it right when they decided that congress should rule DC. Too bad they changed it.
And that makes him different than the prostitutes we elect to congress?
Here I am in all my glory:
In some States, it is not against the law for a man and a woman to make an agreement to have sex in exchange for money. The law is broken when one of them does an "overt act" to complete the agreement, and the person who commits the "overt act" is the one charged for solicitation.
A female decoy will make an offer to have sexual intercourse or oral sex with a man and she will tell him how much it will cost. If he agrees she will tell him to to to a nearby house or motel, or drive around the corner. If he goes to the house or motel, or drives around the corner he gets arrested because he committed the first "overt act" to complete the agreement. In he report the decoy will state that when the male left, she walked in the opposite direction.
These can be highly successful sting operations and a LOT of arrests are made. So, when a headline reads that a man has been arrested for "soliciting a prostitute" it is possible that he didn't do the actual solicitation. If this was a sting operation, it is possible that Chavous agreed to pay for sex, but did not make the solicitation.
White collar with a blue shirt: GUILTY!
Our next president????
Whether the decoy is male or female, the same applies to who acts first. I do understand the question though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.