Skip to comments.Federal judge: Iran shares responsibility for 9/11 terror attacks
Posted on 12/17/2011 5:59:21 PM PST by RaceBannon
NEW YORK In an historic hearing in the federal courthouse in Manhattan on Thursday, U.S. District Court Judge George Daniels said he planned to issue a ruling in the coming days declaring that Iran shares in the responsibility for the 9/11 terror attacks.
The extensive record submitted to this court, including fact witnesses and expert testimony, is satisfactory to this court, Judge Daniels said. The court accepts as true the various allegations of the plaintiffs and their experts, he declared, and will issue an order in the coming days that Iran bears legal responsibility for providing material support to the 9/11 plotters and hijackers.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/12/16/federal-judge-iran-shares-responsibility-for-911-terror-attacks/#ixzz1gqZEJaC2
Fox News video on the Iranian defectors and this legal case:
(May 21, 2011)
[not a lot of info but interesting 3 min. segment]
I am tired of the lies from the rulers at Washington and the judges appointed by them.
This is the age of the death of reason.
I don’t know what the facts are in this regard and you don’t either. But your reaction strikes me as knee-jerk and premature. There are certainly plenty of cases of Iran working with Sunni groups (e.g., Hamas). We’ll have to see how the information develops but you don’t sound like you have any interest in the information.
It also need not turn out (I don’t know) that Iran was hand-in-glove with Al Qaeda all the way through. They may simply have provided some specific kinds of assistance (what has long been alleged such as easing travel of Al Qaeda operatives through Iran to Afghanistan etc.). It may or may not turn out to have been any direct planning role from Iran, but to rule it out without knowledge is unwise in light of Iran’s long history of terrorism operations.
I’ve only just found this website so I’ve only glanced at it so far, but it seems to have a lot of info about the legal case:
So, will this be the premise and basis for jumping in to grab our missplaced drone and stir up the hornets?
Unreal!!! Intelligent, thoughtful, analytical people can distinguish between (1) seeking and analyzing the facts, and (2) then debating what (if anything) to do in response to what is learned.
Propagandists already have everything answered except how to assemble and distort new bits of “info” to create their next propaganda message. That is the modus operandus of the Paulistas, who do not even want to *know* what is not known if it would inconvenience their fixed-in-concrete assumptions.
This judge’s credentials are as far left as you can get. This is no right wing conspiracy. Daniels clerked for Rose Bird and was nominated by Clinton.
Have you no shame, sir?
RE: “only just found this website so Ive only glanced at it so far, but it seems to have a lot of info about the legal case: (URL name).”
Thanks Enchante for the ping, thanks Race for the post. Tis late at my end. But I will check out the URL. And I am glad to see how E corrected one poster in that the Shiite dominated Iranian goons often totally support some Sunni based terrorist groups. IMHO the ruling Mullah so called religious leaders, yea.... Satan’s disciples in disguise who perhaps actually think they are against Satan, the real one, have enslaved the Persian peoples with their religious henchmen organizations such as the Kuds Force to name but one. I have been watching quite a few recent town halls by some of the Repub candidates to run against the American Mullah Supreme leader. I’m a bit tired. But I will give the web site a shot. Do both have a great upcoming day.
I decided I should book mark your reference and place it into my Able Danger folder. It needs my clearer head reading at a later date. Thanks E.
Getting past the profanity, I thought some of the comments were interesting, too.
Per your thread of #16 referencing a given URL. Dear Lord. What total bull shit. And I know you feel the same way.
Make even tougherer sanctions. The toughestest sanctions ever made. That’ll show them.
Propaganda for the war with Iran.
That’s true, I do! LOL!
I can think of a few mroe reasons to do it... :)
Good thing we have “Federal judges” to tell us things like this. I sure fell better.
Prelude to war with Iran?