Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arrest warrant issued for Iraqi vice president
CNN ^ | 12/19/2011 | Arwa Damon and Mohammed Tawfeeq

Posted on 12/19/2011 10:27:45 AM PST by americanophile

Baghdad (CNN) -- Iraq's Judicial Committee issued an arrest warrant Monday for Vice President Tariq al-Hashimi, who is accused of orchestrating bombing attacks.

The warrant was issued under "Article 4," which is terrorism.

The Interior Ministry, at a news conference, showed what it called confession videos from people identified as security guards for al-Hashimi, the country's Sunni vice president. In the videos, the men described various occasions in which they purportedly carried out attacks under direct orders from al-Hashimi.

One man said he carried out assassination attempts using roadside bombs and guns with silencers. He said the orders came from the vice president and at times through the director of his office.

CNN could not immediately confirm that the men in the videos were bodyguards for al-Hashimi.

Three of the vice president's security guards were detained earlier this month.

Al-Hashimi's office did not answer calls from CNN Monday.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: alhashimi; arrest; hashimi; iraq; iraqvp; tariqalhashimi; vicepresident
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: americanophile

First the Iranian refugees, now the Sunni. Am I cynical, yes and taught by history.


21 posted on 12/19/2011 10:52:44 AM PST by JimSEA (The future ain't what it used to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smith288

Get ready for total chaos followed by invasion from Iran. The hegemony will be mind boggling. What a waste of lives and money.


22 posted on 12/19/2011 10:52:54 AM PST by Ardenroad gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: smith288

Correct.


23 posted on 12/19/2011 10:53:18 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

With the US Army gone, it is now a great time to start settling old scores and for the dominant Shiites to seize control. Probably look for civil war by Christmas.


24 posted on 12/19/2011 10:53:18 AM PST by Busywhiskers ("Once you have wrestled, everything else in life is easy" -Dan Gable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike
Yep...and under Obama's leadership, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Turkey could also all follow.

He is presiding over the beginnings of the creation of an Islamic Caliphate IMHO. But that's not surprising.

The Truth about Obama's Upbringing

25 posted on 12/19/2011 10:56:46 AM PST by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

With all the players in place, yes it will proceed without delay. Iran won’t invade, they’ll be invited. As shown on earlier report one sect is beginning to run north, don’t remember or care if its shites or suunies, different shade same bunch who in the end will either kill us if we don’t kill them.


26 posted on 12/19/2011 10:56:57 AM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

Iran is 90%+ Shia, 4-9% Sunni


27 posted on 12/19/2011 10:59:55 AM PST by cowtowney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

No matter how bad things get in Iraq, the MSM will be telling us it’s Obama’s showpiece success story in foreign policy up to the election. No lie is too big to tell with this president and his minions in the MSM.


28 posted on 12/19/2011 11:05:55 AM PST by Spok (From hope and change to change is hopeless. In just the first term.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

The conquest and withdrawal from Iraq was a gift to Iran, something they never could accomplish during the Iran-Iraq War: do away with Sunni control and bring Iraq into the Iranian orbit.


29 posted on 12/19/2011 11:07:09 AM PST by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

Good Grief! That didn’t take long!


30 posted on 12/19/2011 11:14:04 AM PST by pgkdan ("Make what Americans buy, Buy what Americans make, and sell it to the world" Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

The not very slow train wreck that is Iraq after the end of the US occupation is just the natural consequence. Did our presence help or hurt the pacification or post-war Iraq?

Either way, we are no longer able to afford an open-ended commitment to defense of civilization in lands where being civilized is an alien concept.


31 posted on 12/19/2011 11:15:15 AM PST by alloysteel (Are Democrats truly "better angels"? They are lousy stewards for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

Absolutely. This is the consequence of our blundering in and meddling in a part of the world where our only interest in in securing cheap sources of fuel - not acting as referee for people who hate us just as much as they hate one another. Our policy should be one of economic self-interest in the area, pure and simple. Not some idealistic crusade or a futile attempt for false ‘stability’ at all costs. We can buy cheap oil from despots just as well as democrats, we’ve proven that in Saudi Arabia.


32 posted on 12/19/2011 11:15:39 AM PST by americanophile ("this absurd theology of an immoral Bedouin, is a rotting corpse which poisons our lives" - Ataturk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
The VP is Sunni, the PM is Shi’ite...even if the charges are legitimate, it will be seen as the Shi’ite leader attempting to remove his most powerful Sunni opponents. There’s already accusations of forced confessions, etc. This will quickly degenerate into sectarian strife of one kind or another.

You're probably right. It's been their way of life for millennia, and there's no reason to think it will change unto the end of time.

33 posted on 12/19/2011 11:16:54 AM PST by lonevoice (Klepto Baracka Marxo, impeach we much. We will much about that be committed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

And they’re not done yet.

Perhaps mObama can attack more nations for Iran.


34 posted on 12/19/2011 11:22:19 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Why back in '88, Conservatives backed Gore in Texas. What Reagan revolution? What laegacy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

And yet Obama still has a legitmate chance of winning in 2012. We are doomed!


35 posted on 12/19/2011 11:22:36 AM PST by mmanager (Reagan Revolution + Republican Revolution = Bury Obama in 2012 - Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
"...we are no longer able to afford an open-ended commitment to defense of civilization in lands where being civilized is an alien concept."

Absolutely!

36 posted on 12/19/2011 11:23:27 AM PST by americanophile ("this absurd theology of an immoral Bedouin, is a rotting corpse which poisons our lives" - Ataturk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

He got it right.

Iran’s fingerprints are all over the Shiite PM having the Sunni VP arrested.


37 posted on 12/19/2011 11:25:44 AM PST by green iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

Nuc them all. Take the oil.

Any questions?


38 posted on 12/19/2011 11:43:21 AM PST by MindBender26 (Stop bothering me with minor issues. I'm too damn busy trying to save our country from Obamaism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

If Bush didn’t freeze up, the same imperative by which we took out Sadaam should have been followed by toppling Assad in Syria and at least reducing Iran to a non threat.

We had an enormous army there to do it. Then we put our tanks in garages and let Iran and Syria bleed the situation.

But then, only time will tell.


39 posted on 12/19/2011 11:43:45 AM PST by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Why do we need their oil? Anyone who would consider nuking them would also be smart enough to know that we can use our own resources and reserves... ;)


40 posted on 12/19/2011 11:46:39 AM PST by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson