Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul leads Iowa polls, still third in national polls (Romney 18, Perry 16, Gingrich 13)
Rock River Times ^ | December 19, 2011 | Staff

Posted on 12/19/2011 1:19:16 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-54 last
To: Oceander
Perry at 16% and Romney at 18%? I thought Perry was supposed to be a has-been’s has-been, sitting in the toilet with polling numbers under 10%.

Do you seriously believe a poll that has Ron Paul at the top? If you actually believe that, I believe I have a spare bridge or two I might like to sell you.
51 posted on 12/19/2011 11:13:03 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I watched Fred Thompson today and while it was clear that they were discussing the Insider Advantage Poll, no one thought it relevant to mention that Rick Perry is sitting in a strong third position, just behind Romney, and ahead of Gingrich.

This is inexplicable except by assuming that Fox management has set this silence as policy.

IOW, Perry is a close second discounting the loon Paul. I think it is likely that Perry will finish Iowa ahead of everyone in Iowa, even Paul.

In shorthand terms, that’s a win.

I really want to see how Fox handles THAT.

52 posted on 12/20/2011 2:35:07 AM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine


FOX is doing their finger in the dike suppression of a Rick Perry surge to help Romney.

And they don’t care how it looks.

53 posted on 12/20/2011 2:53:15 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

I don’t seriously believe in the intelligence, let alone the sanity, of anyone who would consider putting Ron Paul in charge of anything more important than the local dog-catcher’s office.

That being said, neither do I seriously believe in the intelligence or sanity of anyone who would pick any of the crop of candidates who does not have 10 years of successful experience running a large state, a state that by all objective measures is doing considerably better than most of the other states in the Union.

But hey, that’s just me, I prefer to look at the whole record, the good and the bad, and weigh the total outcome; I really don’t care to fixate like some idiot-savant on some niggling little zit and turn it into some pre-apocalyptic nightmare. I also prefer to pay attention to the walk, not the talk, so I pay very, very, very little attention to the b.s. that passes for “debates” these days and it is beyond belief that anyone with any pretentions to intelligence would pay any more attention to the so-called “debates” than they would to dancing with the stars.

54 posted on 12/20/2011 4:37:57 AM PST by Oceander (TINSTAAFL - Mother Nature Abhors a Free Lunch almost as much as She Abhors a Vacuum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson