Posted on 12/20/2011 9:05:00 AM PST by TBBT
A few days ago, some folks took exception with my last post about Ron Paul, claiming that the video wherein Paul stated that there was “glee” in the White House after 9/11 did not establish that Ron Paul was a truther. Silly me, I assumed that people remembered all the material from 2008 which had already pretty much proved the point, but it appears that some have forgotten. Let us review, then, some small portion of the evidence.
Much of the raw evidence, gleamed from raw footage/audio of Paul on certified nutjob and avowed 9/11 truther Alex Jones’ radio show (and other private meetings which were recorded) has since been pulled down, but this nugget remains:
(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...
3..2..1....
In before the Paulbots...
Notice how the mainstream liberal media ignores all the facts that expose Paul as a raving crackpot while they dredge up everything possible on the conservative candidates. They know that the longer they let this nutcase pollute the GOP field, the better for their buddy Obama and liberal RINO Romney.
One clear prospective result for those voting for Ron Paul is it is likely to effectively assure the reelection of Obama...and here’s how.
Since Ron Paul has not forsworn running as an Independent if he does not win the GOP primary...which he stands almost no chance of winning, it clear he harbors serious plans of running an Independent.
So, it seems to e the question is; if Paul gets a strong even if unsuccessful showing in the GOP primary, does it make him more or less likely to run as an Independent? I say it makes it far more likely to run as an Independent and siphoning off more than enough votes in the general to throw the election to Obama. IMHO
A Paul voter is an Obama voter
Alex Jones is a flake and Ron Paul is wrong if he believes Jones. Nevertheless, Paul is certainly better than Obama, and I will vote for him without hesitation should he be the nominee.
I voted for Bush for governor of Texas and twice for President. He mishandled the “War on Terror” which should have been a “War on Islamic Radicals”. He is responsible for the current and future mess in Iraq. The end of 2011 was Bush’s withdrawal date. We should have been out of Afghanistan and Iraq after eliminating Saddam and using the two nations as bases to neutralize Iran. Iran is going nuclear because Bush failed.
Given the choices I had in 2000 and 2004, I’d vote for Bush again. He is a genuinely good and honest person but he is at heart a big government advocate.
Paul sounds crazy because the situation we find ourselves in as a nation is completely insane. Paul is telling the truth about our financial condition which is a far bigger threat than Islam at the moment.
Actually, no. A Paul voter is a Paul voter. An Obama voter is an Obama voter.
Agree. Both of their(RP and Obama)ideologies are really two sides of the same left-wing coin.
Ron Paul is a very scary guy! Rush Limbaugh pegged him last week after the debate as did Mark Levin. The Rat’s are hoping that Paul runs on his own to split the party. I hope that Paul just fades in the Abyss he really is...
I believe there was a fifth aircraft on the grassy knoll.
Actually, a Paul voter is a loon, and an Oblunder voter is a leech.
Irregardless of Ron Paul’s assertions, the U.S. government could have done a better job of refuting claims that their cases on Kennedy, Golf Of Tonkin, USS Liberty, and 9-11 are under-supported. You would think the officials could provide proof and explain why Bldg 7 collapsed directly into it’s footprint as if charges were set, - and it takes many days to set that up.
moi aussi!
Firebirds
Since Dec 6, 2011
Firebirds hasn’t created an about page
NOOB!
One ray of hope:
It’s not certain that Paul wouldn’t siphon more votes from Obama, Dem and Indy.
In these videos he comes across as someone who is very skeptical of government and government investigations in general. The skepticism stated in these videos regarding the official 9/11 story is all about potential coverup of bureaucratic incompetence having to do with the government response and handling of 9/11. This is government after all. There's no evidence or statements at all in these videos to backup a claim that Paul is on board with any of the standard "truther" nut job views, like it was an "inside job" or something like that. Just skepticism of government & government "investigations" in general.
Again, just trying to be fair and objective based upon the "evidence" posted in this blog, which doesn't support the claims in the title. If there is better, alternative evidence I'd love to see it, so I can make up my own mind whether Paul is a truther or not, rather than take the word of some blogger.
my last post about Ron Paul, claiming that the video wherein Paul stated that there was “glee” in the White House after 9/11
__________________________________________________
Now for some truth.
Paul’s point was Bush had intentions of going into Iraq prior to 911.
There is no disputing this.
Other provided credible links which totally support and back that up.
The links are here.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2818292/posts
Some of the spin being generated by this is speeding up the rotation of the planet.
Guess between the poll and the sugar high from the skittles the Occupy Mom's Basement crowd is all a buzz...
Until it wears off...
Ok, you got us. We lit off a Rosie O'Donnell fart.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.