Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yes, Virginia, Ron Paul is a 9/11 Truther (and a Coddler of Racists)
Redstate ^ | 12/20/2011 | Leon H. Wolf

Posted on 12/20/2011 9:05:00 AM PST by TBBT

A few days ago, some folks took exception with my last post about Ron Paul, claiming that the video wherein Paul stated that there was “glee” in the White House after 9/11 did not establish that Ron Paul was a truther. Silly me, I assumed that people remembered all the material from 2008 which had already pretty much proved the point, but it appears that some have forgotten. Let us review, then, some small portion of the evidence.

Much of the raw evidence, gleamed from raw footage/audio of Paul on certified nutjob and avowed 9/11 truther Alex Jones’ radio show (and other private meetings which were recorded) has since been pulled down, but this nugget remains:

(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: paul; paulestinians
Oh, no, they say he's got to go Go Go Ronzilla...
1 posted on 12/20/2011 9:05:05 AM PST by TBBT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TBBT

3..2..1....


2 posted on 12/20/2011 9:06:20 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

In before the Paulbots...


3 posted on 12/20/2011 9:09:38 AM PST by madmaximus (Anyone But Robamney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Notice how the mainstream liberal media ignores all the facts that expose Paul as a raving crackpot while they dredge up everything possible on the conservative candidates. They know that the longer they let this nutcase pollute the GOP field, the better for their buddy Obama and liberal RINO Romney.


4 posted on 12/20/2011 9:13:19 AM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

One clear prospective result for those voting for Ron Paul is it is likely to effectively assure the reelection of Obama...and here’s how.

Since Ron Paul has not forsworn running as an Independent if he does not win the GOP primary...which he stands almost no chance of winning, it clear he harbors serious plans of running an Independent.

So, it seems to e the question is; if Paul gets a strong even if unsuccessful showing in the GOP primary, does it make him more or less likely to run as an Independent? I say it makes it far more likely to run as an Independent and siphoning off more than enough votes in the general to throw the election to Obama. IMHO


5 posted on 12/20/2011 9:30:40 AM PST by kimoajax (Rack'em & Stack'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

A Paul voter is an Obama voter


6 posted on 12/20/2011 9:32:38 AM PST by Flightdeck (If you hear me yell "Eject, Eject, Eject!" the last two will be echos...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Alex Jones is a flake and Ron Paul is wrong if he believes Jones. Nevertheless, Paul is certainly better than Obama, and I will vote for him without hesitation should he be the nominee.

I voted for Bush for governor of Texas and twice for President. He mishandled the “War on Terror” which should have been a “War on Islamic Radicals”. He is responsible for the current and future mess in Iraq. The end of 2011 was Bush’s withdrawal date. We should have been out of Afghanistan and Iraq after eliminating Saddam and using the two nations as bases to neutralize Iran. Iran is going nuclear because Bush failed.

Given the choices I had in 2000 and 2004, I’d vote for Bush again. He is a genuinely good and honest person but he is at heart a big government advocate.

Paul sounds crazy because the situation we find ourselves in as a nation is completely insane. Paul is telling the truth about our financial condition which is a far bigger threat than Islam at the moment.


7 posted on 12/20/2011 9:46:48 AM PST by old3030 (I lost some time once. It's always in the last place you look.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck

Actually, no. A Paul voter is a Paul voter. An Obama voter is an Obama voter.


8 posted on 12/20/2011 10:02:17 AM PST by Xenalyte (Pablo is very wily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck

Agree. Both of their(RP and Obama)ideologies are really two sides of the same left-wing coin.


9 posted on 12/20/2011 10:07:04 AM PST by madmaximus (Anyone But Robamney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight

Ron Paul is a very scary guy! Rush Limbaugh pegged him last week after the debate as did Mark Levin. The Rat’s are hoping that Paul runs on his own to split the party. I hope that Paul just fades in the Abyss he really is...


10 posted on 12/20/2011 10:10:02 AM PST by ncfool (The new USSA - United Socialist States of AmeriKa. Welcome to Obummers world or Obamaville USSA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

I believe there was a fifth aircraft on the grassy knoll.


11 posted on 12/20/2011 10:10:34 AM PST by VeniVidiVici ("Si, se gimme!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
"Actually, no. A Paul voter is a Paul voter. An Obama voter is an Obama voter."

Actually, a Paul voter is a loon, and an Oblunder voter is a leech.

12 posted on 12/20/2011 10:10:49 AM PST by Wizdum (Wisdom is what you gain when things go wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Irregardless of Ron Paul’s assertions, the U.S. government could have done a better job of refuting claims that their cases on Kennedy, Golf Of Tonkin, USS Liberty, and 9-11 are under-supported. You would think the officials could provide proof and explain why Bldg 7 collapsed directly into it’s footprint as if charges were set, - and it takes many days to set that up.


13 posted on 12/20/2011 10:19:27 AM PST by Firebirds (Extradite Obama to Mexico!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

moi aussi!


14 posted on 12/20/2011 10:42:35 AM PST by old school
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Firebirds

Firebirds
Since Dec 6, 2011

Firebirds hasn’t created an about page

NOOB!


15 posted on 12/20/2011 11:03:15 AM PST by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kimoajax

One ray of hope:

It’s not certain that Paul wouldn’t siphon more votes from Obama, Dem and Indy.


16 posted on 12/20/2011 11:04:27 AM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TBBT
So, independent of other documented sources and statements on the part of Paul, I actually went to this site & watched the videos that claim to be supporting evidence of Paul being a truther - and saw no such thing. Just trying to be fair here, and NO I'm not a Paul supporter and never have been.

In these videos he comes across as someone who is very skeptical of government and government investigations in general. The skepticism stated in these videos regarding the official 9/11 story is all about potential coverup of bureaucratic incompetence having to do with the government response and handling of 9/11. This is government after all. There's no evidence or statements at all in these videos to backup a claim that Paul is on board with any of the standard "truther" nut job views, like it was an "inside job" or something like that. Just skepticism of government & government "investigations" in general.

Again, just trying to be fair and objective based upon the "evidence" posted in this blog, which doesn't support the claims in the title. If there is better, alternative evidence I'd love to see it, so I can make up my own mind whether Paul is a truther or not, rather than take the word of some blogger.

17 posted on 12/20/2011 11:14:02 AM PST by MCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

my last post about Ron Paul, claiming that the video wherein Paul stated that there was “glee” in the White House after 9/11

__________________________________________________

Now for some truth.

Paul’s point was Bush had intentions of going into Iraq prior to 911.

There is no disputing this.

Other provided credible links which totally support and back that up.

The links are here.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2818292/posts

Some of the spin being generated by this is speeding up the rotation of the planet.


18 posted on 12/20/2011 11:20:45 AM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madmaximus
The Paulbots are getting frisky...

Guess between the poll and the sugar high from the skittles the Occupy Mom's Basement crowd is all a buzz...

Until it wears off...

19 posted on 12/20/2011 11:25:06 AM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Firebirds
explain why Bldg 7 collapsed directly into it’s footprint as if charges were set, - and it takes many days to set that up.

Ok, you got us.   We lit off a Rosie O'Donnell fart.

20 posted on 12/20/2011 12:06:47 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kimoajax

I don’t think it is clear at all that Paul will run as an independent. His followers hope that he will run as a libertarian, but I seriously doubt it. He knows Obama will be back in if he does that and he despises Obama’s policies.

However, with the GOP clearly rejecting and/or ignoring the constitutional and bankster concerns of Paul voters (and the Tea Party), chances are, the GOP will fail to pull in much of that vote after Paul loses.

Although I have looked into this 911 troofer stuff and find it full of disinformation for the sole purpose of leftists demonizing Cheney and Bush, I see nothing wrong with an investigation to shut them up and send them packing.

The only one to address at least some of those constitutional and corruption concerns in a serious way, is Perry. I have not heard him address the over zealousness of Homeland inSecurity (applying Islamic terrorist law enforcement power to all Americans the Liberals do not like) and reinstating our rights and dignity that have been lost in what has become a politically correct scam against the American people and our Republic and freedom.


21 posted on 12/20/2011 2:10:49 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
Re. NOOB!

- an irrelevant fact. No matter.

22 posted on 12/20/2011 3:04:26 PM PST by Firebirds (Extradite Obama to Mexico!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

allegedly. geesh I forgot that aspect. LOL


23 posted on 12/20/2011 3:04:37 PM PST by Firebirds (Extradite Obama to Mexico!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson