Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DeaconBenjamin

You forgot the minor point that the “reckless” lending was forced on lenders by gov’t rules, lawyers, and professional race-baiters like obomba.


2 posted on 12/23/2011 9:08:57 AM PST by Neoliberalnot ((Read "The Grey Book" for an alternative to corruption in DC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Neoliberalnot

Which is exactly why there are no prosecutions. It would expose the criminal involvement of shake down politicans and their HUD activists like ACORN.


4 posted on 12/23/2011 9:20:00 AM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Neoliberalnot

No, it wasn’t.

I wish people would quit repeating this “conventional wisdom.”

The number of CRA or similar “forced” loans out there in the mortgage market are so small relative to the number of PRIME, CONFORMING mortgages that were written to people with questionable ability to pay (but good FICO scores - some of which were “rented”) is minute.

Look at the percentage of PRIME, CONFORMING mortgages in default or foreclosure. No one had to force any bank to write a PRIME, CONFORMING loan. No one. They just *do*. That’s their business.

No one forced the banks to drop the 20% down payment. I used to think that the impetus behind dropping the 20% down payment was the government. No, in fact the government was lobbied by one Angelo Mozillo (he of Countrywide, you know, the white-haired guy with the fabulous tan) to drop the 20% down payment requirement so that Countrywide could originate more PRIME, CONFORMING loans which they could then sell to Fannie/Freddie/everyone as MBS packages.

Once the realization was out that dropping from 20% down to 10% down got “X%” more business in the loan market, then the banks started engaging in behavior to get the other 10% eliminated - anything to be able to write a loan and then sell it into the securitization stream.

The key takeaway here for conservatives is that the banks are NOT blameless. They brought this one themselves. They’re the ones STILL engaging in fraudulent behavior - look at the recent legal action brought by the AG in Nevada. The bankers and their lawyers were warned about robo-signing on foreclosure docs. It’s wrong, it’s illegal and it’s unethical for lawyers to engage or participate in such frauds upon the court.

They’re STILL doing it.

Now, back to the Man With The Tan:

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2010/2010-197.htm

Why isn’t this guy in jail? Where was the DOJ on the criminal aspects of these charges? He’s engaged in securities fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud, you name it in the loan scams he ran. The results of his actions are still likely to take down Bank of America. Why is he still walking around free?

Conservatives need to quit thinking that the bankers are blameless, that they’re victims of big government. They’re not.

Oh, and for those who still think that the CRA was the cause of so much rampant lending: Explain why the situation is the same in the UK, in Australia, in China, in Spain, etc. Did US law force the banks to lend to real estate buyers who couldn’t service the debt there too? No, the bankers went wild in the last 10 years - everywhere.


8 posted on 12/23/2011 10:01:06 AM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson