Posted on 12/29/2011 2:43:08 PM PST by John Roco
Normally I’d say screw the Gay Republicans, but ummm... they just might take it the wrong way...
It's what they do.
Quick! Someone better tell annie her buds are ‘acting up’. I am sure she will be just shocked and resign from their board immediately...out of principle. /s
Thanks for the laugh.
log smuggling republicrats eh.
well...er...yes...they do take it the wrong way(snarky snicker).
People who practice sodomy are evil. It can never be considered “good”. These people are a grave danger to boys—the age at which they were either physically molested or emotionally destroyed by their “protectors”.
People like Ann Coulter should denounce this “group” of immoral people. They want one thing—to normalize evil—and then they will normalize man/boy sex. APA has already been doing their part as has the UN and the Rights of the Child.
They want Ancient Greece where pederasty was elevated—much like in Afghanistan now—where the main recreation of men is sodomizing the boys. Women are always second class citizens or slaves in homosexual societies-—like the Samurai.
Ann Coulter—it is LEARNED behavior-—a worldview of paganism/occultism—you should be ashamed of yourself for giving your time and them a platform. You are advocating child abuse when you advocate for gay behavior. ALWAYS.
Before I write anything else, I agree with your premise. Some people tend to tip-toe around the sexual abuse of children by homosexual adults, and it is especially noticeable in the media. However...
Within the first three paragraphs (on a Fox news website from Minnesota), it is also obvious that we’re talking about a gay man here. It isn’t hidden in any kind of way, at least not to me. A man taking videotapes of naked boys sounds like a homosexual to me, and probably to the other people, too. It’s like writing, “All of the clothing was soaked after the rainstorm.” You don’t have to tell readers that water is wet. When a man does what this guy does, he’s gay.
What is interesting in its absence, to agree with you, is comment from the schools, or, for that matter, outcry from the local gay and lesbian groups trying to distance themselves from this guy. No one wants to go down the road pointing out that abuse by gays against children is proportionately much higher than heterosexuals against children, and silence helps prevent that from being said.
Well, you can always say "Up yours!"
Oh, wait...
when they ‘repeal’ something, doesnt that mean they GO BACK TO THE PREVIOUS POLICY?
When they REPEALED DADT why did it go to “ANYTHING GOES”
He’s a Republican? We know this?
If he was chairman of the local democratic party it probably wouldn’t be in the article.
Stinking pedos. There is no “cure” so I’d say they may as well be executed or a least sent to some island for life. Locking them up for a few years and letting them out again is pointless.
I had a conversation with a DHS worker recently — who says male homosexuals are definitely higher risk for sexual molestation of male children.
But in today’s politically correct society we aren’t allowed to acknowledge that.
“I had a conversation with a DHS worker recently who says male homosexuals are definitely higher risk for sexual molestation of male children.”
I’d add that male homosexuals that work with children should be under constant surveillance (if not outright fired).
No homosexual male shoudl ever be allowed near children.
They will call you a liar if you say they are all pedophiles, but place them near the temptation of children and sooner or later it will come out.
I do not know a lot of homosexuals, but I do know a few and they are nice enough people, but I wouldn’t leave my kids alone with them.
And never quite tell the truth about "outlawing Catholic Charities adoption and foster care in Illinois (2011), District of Columbia (2010)".
Nothing was "outlawed", those government entities just told Catholic Charities that there would be no more tax payer funded adoptions unless they agreed to adopt children to queer "families".
That's the inconvenient truth.
It’s not a “middle school”.
It’s Immaculata HIGH SCHOOL!
Immaculata High School
http://www.immaculatahighschool.org/
So far they he has taped 22 YOUNG BOYS nuder in the showers!
His DAUGHTER goes to Immaculata High School.
It’s not a “middle school”.
It’s Immaculata HIGH SCHOOL!
Immaculata High School
http://www.immaculatahighschool.org/
So far they he has taped 22 YOUNG BOYS nuder in the showers!
His DAUGHTER goes to Immaculata High School.
It’s not a “middle school”.
It’s Immaculata HIGH SCHOOL!
Immaculata High School
http://www.immaculatahighschool.org/
So far they he has taped 22 YOUNG BOYS nuder in the showers!
His DAUGHTER goes to Immaculata High School.
Sorry for the multiple postings.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.