Posted on 12/30/2011 2:34:17 AM PST by yank in the UK
An unusual nativity display at a Claremont church that portrayed gay couples was vandalized over the weekend in an incident authorities are investigating as a hate crime.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimesblogs.latimes.com ...
Really? The hate crime was building a homosexual nativity scene. How about investigating that and making an arrest for a hate crime against God..........
Seems that a gay nativity scene is a hate crime against Christians.
Lets see if have the liberal calculus straight on this stuff.
Having a picture of Mohamed is a hate crime.
Having a gay nativity is ok.
Tipping over a gay nativity is a hate crime.
These liberal hate crime rules are labyrinthine.
No it’s not; it’s a love crime.
Murphy v. Ramsey and Others 1885 “...no legislation can be supposed more wholesome and necessary in the founding of a free,self governing commonwealth...that that which seeks to establish it on the basis of the idea of the family,as consisting of and springing from the union for life of one man and one woman in the holy estate of matrimony...” Now the very definition of fraud would be made manifest in this blasphemous suggestion of a Christmas nativity that suggests it was any other married couple than Joseph and Mary... While I support the right of private property gross distortion of the imagery reflecting hte reason for the Season is just WRONG!
Oh and lest I forget to mention it—IMO if the church was the
one who put up this blasphemy —I can’t help but wonder what else they would/have changed of the Gospel story. I could Not encourage any to remain in her—but instead loudly shout from the mountain top and in the desert and in the street” Come out of her my people!” IMO any correction done to this corruption can in no way be a Hate Crime—for the HATE was in corruption of the Nativity displayed on that property.
“The Queeen James.”
Great; I guarantee I’ll be “borrowing” that one!
Seems to me the authorities need to be targeted next time around.
So the democrat government has created special classes of people whom they provide special privileges to and cause more severe punishment to those who disagree with those “special classes of people”. I do HATE that!
Genesis 2:24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.
Funny!!!
Lets see if have the liberal calculus straight on this stuff.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
If the depiction were of a gay, Black couple, would it be a double hate crime?
And if you get multiple ‘hate crimes’ in the same instance shouldn’t it warrant at least the death penalty?
Maybe we could make the punishment ‘Stoned to death’
Kind of like the kid getting his arse waled yelling out
“Gee you told me you and your pals used to tip over outhouses when you were kids”.
“Not with my Grandfather in it you fool”.
I don’t really want to know, but how can you make a Nativity scene a gay nativity scene.
Do you dress them in pink? Or are there two Joseph’s and no Mary?
It’s friggin insane the extremes these fags go to.
Let us imagine the following...
“A statue of the pedo Mohamed abusing a young girl,say a 9 year old girl. If a muslim decides to knock the statue over, would he be sued for hate crime or would he be let off as he felt offended ?
It never cease to amaze me that offending Christians is totally acceptable.
The church allowing that display should be burnt down.
Let us imagine the following...
“A statue of the pedo Mohamed abusing a young girl,say a 9 year old girl. If a muslim decides to knock the statue over, would he be sued for hate crime or would he be let off as he felt offended ?
It never cease to amaze me that offending Christians is totally acceptable.
The church allowing that display should be burnt down.
So typical of gay blades ~ no respect for anyone else's rights.
Maybe the wind blew them over.
Can the wind be charged with a “Hate Crime”?
What makes the wind blow?
But if a muslim cuts off the head of his daughter for marrying a non muslim that is just an honor killing, not a hate crime...
You’re right. It would be called “free speech”.
The question has to be asked -
if a homosexual or homo activist were to vandalize a Christian display or property,
would it be a “hate crime”?
If not, the homos’ whining needs to be ignored.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.