Skip to comments.
Gay nativity scene vandalized at Claremont church
LAtimes ^
| 29th Dec, 2011
| Abby Sewell
Posted on 12/30/2011 2:34:17 AM PST by yank in the UK
An unusual nativity display at a Claremont church that portrayed gay couples was vandalized over the weekend in an incident authorities are investigating as a hate crime.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimesblogs.latimes.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Philosophy; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; claremont; hatecrime; homosexualagenda; nativity; perverts; prop8
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: verga
To: Popman
“Gay couple in a Nativity scene?.....”
Wonder if they stood next to the sheep! n/s
42
posted on
12/30/2011 5:31:24 AM PST
by
cameraeye
(A happy kaffir!)
To: yank in the UK
They failed to note that there always queers at the birth.
Some say the three wise men were actually a menage a trois
Also, queer angels were not seen because they were still in the closet
43
posted on
12/30/2011 5:34:46 AM PST
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
To: mas cerveza por favor
It is more likely the gays tipped over the figures themselves to get the publicity.More likely still that someone was merely trying to have sex with them.
44
posted on
12/30/2011 5:41:32 AM PST
by
Junior_G
(Funny how liberals' love affair with Muslims began on 9/11)
To: yank in the UK
What about practicing/open adulterers or thieves? Will Claremont accept them? If not, why not?
45
posted on
12/30/2011 5:51:01 AM PST
by
Scotsman will be Free
(11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
To: bert
I had an Idiot liberal try to tell me that Jesus and his disciples were gay, and participated in group sex. I didn't even bother arguing, what's the point of having a serious discussion with someone that's so deluded?
46
posted on
12/30/2011 5:53:04 AM PST
by
yank in the UK
(decapitation before capitulation)
To: Darkwolf377
I'm not for vandalizing anyone's private property, but this seems like the non-story of the year to me. I mean, a couple of decorations were pushed over? Gee, how many hundreds of thousands of dollars will it take to, you know, pick them back up? 
Besides, all queers are pushovers. See "glory hole" or "bathhouse" for more details.
Cheers!
47
posted on
12/30/2011 6:00:37 AM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: PeteB570
Heh heh heh. He said "blow!" /beavis and butthead>
Cheers!
48
posted on
12/30/2011 6:02:11 AM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: F15Eagle
Days of Noah....
Matt. 24:37-38: “But as the days of Noah were, so also will the coming of the Son of Man be. “For as in the days before the flood, they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered the ark.
49
posted on
12/30/2011 6:14:08 AM PST
by
mdmathis6
(Christ came not to make mankind into God but to put God into men!)
To: yank in the UK
I’ve heard such arguements before and to hear such “evidence”, one might conclude that even all NFL football teams must be bastions of gay sexaholism!
50
posted on
12/30/2011 6:19:29 AM PST
by
mdmathis6
(Christ came not to make mankind into God but to put God into men!)
To: yank in the UK; Chode
51
posted on
12/30/2011 6:33:44 AM PST
by
Morgana
(I only come here to see what happens next. It normally does.)
To: yank in the UK
To which I would reply, “and all LIBs are child molesters.”
LIBs only understand derogatory name-calling.
52
posted on
12/30/2011 6:35:44 AM PST
by
NTHockey
(Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
To: yank in the UK
Given the state of news shows these days, I’m surprised this “crime against humanity” didn’t show up on the Weather Channel.
53
posted on
12/30/2011 6:52:08 AM PST
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: mdmathis6
I’ve heard such arguements before and to hear such “evidence”, one might conclude that even all NFL football teams must be bastions of gay sexaholism! I can guess where *they * went to college!
NO cheers, unfortunately.
54
posted on
12/30/2011 6:56:30 AM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: Darkwolf377
Bingo. Gay histrionics + the cult of victimization explains this one very well. It shouldn’t have even made the church newsletter.
55
posted on
12/30/2011 7:02:16 AM PST
by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: Cowboy Bob; yank in the UK
Officer, It was I.
I'll go quietly? No cuffs, Please! The neighbors The children.
56
posted on
12/30/2011 7:15:55 AM PST
by
Kenny Bunk
((So, you're telling me Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts can't figure out this eligibility stuff?))
To: Venturer
Good question. Just what are the statues doing that one would know they are gay? Could be sisters or brothers or dad/son, mom/daughter if it is just holding hands or getting a hug. Perhaps they had a sign on their backs saying we are homosexual..... inquiring minds what to know!
57
posted on
12/30/2011 7:40:45 AM PST
by
cotton
To: cameraeye
——Wonder if they stood next to the sheep! n/s——
Better yet....stood BEHIND the sheep !!!
58
posted on
12/30/2011 8:42:00 AM PST
by
Popman
(Obama is God's curse upon the land....)
Comment #59 Removed by Moderator
To: Morgana
feh...
60
posted on
12/30/2011 3:02:45 PM PST
by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
