I realize FR has slipped a bit in the decorum department over the years but you have taken it a giant leap towards the DUmmy flavor of discourse. I don't believe that is what is expected here.
Now to the subject that apprantely has you upset, my contention is that the money dumped into politics is corrupting the process and at the root of many of our nation's troubles. I call it corruption.
As an example, there is not one member of Congress that dare wage an effort a effort at serious reform of the banking lobby beyond mild posturing. Yet, I and I believe many FReepers see problems with what they banks have done to this country. Specifically, they did not act responsibly or in a conservative manner.
I don't believe giving them additional voice by allowing them, as companies, to contribute to political campaigns helps solve the problem. Actually, I wish we could find a way to get all money out of politics. It was a big step in the wrong direction to dump a whole bunch more of a corrupting influence into the process by saying companies have free speech rights via campaign contributions.
That in your view might make me wrong but it does not make me a "Jacka**" You use of that word instead of offering a thoughtful reply shows you to be emotional and lazy but I won't accuse you of being unthinking even if you failed to demonstrate that you are.
If you have a point, make it. But save the childish insults. The DUmmies site has plenty of that if you want to go wallow in the mud.
I certainly don't think anyone on here wants to see your cursing.
“I realize FR has slipped a bit in the decorum department over the years but you have taken it a giant leap towards the DUmmy flavor of discourse. I don’t believe that is what is expected here.”
How the hell would you know, newcomer!!!!