Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Case for Gingrich’s Electability
weeklystandard.com ^ | 12/31/2011 | Jeffrey H. Anderson

Posted on 12/31/2011 7:30:28 AM PST by TBBT

It’s an article of faith among many Republicans that Mitt Romney is the most electable candidate in the GOP field. But it’s not clear that this assertion is actually true. In fact, if one were going to design a Republican opponent tailor-made to President Obama’s liking, that opponent would be uniquely vulnerable to Obama’s main rhetorical thrust (making class-warfare arguments), uniquely unsuited to take clear aim at Obama’s least popular action as president (spearheading the passage of Obamacare), and uniquely strong in states that are unlikely to matter in the general election race. In all three of these ways, Romney is made to order for Obama — while his chief rival, Newt Gingrich, is not.

None of this is to question Romney’s potential appeal to moderate voters. Nor is it to deny that Gingrich has more baggage and would be easier for Obama to try to vilify as a “conservative extremist.” But there is more to winning over moderates than simply running the most moderate candidate, and the truth is that no one really knows whether Romney or Gingrich would pose a more powerful electoral challenge to Obama.

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; crybaby; freddiemac; gingrich; mustread; newt; newtgingrich; spoton; unstable
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Jukeman

yep, Romney is the LEAST electable of all the candidates currently running (well... execept for the lunatic Paul)

Romney would get destroyed just like McCain and for similiar reasons. Remember the press told us then that McCain was the most electable also :) I wonder why they would consistently pick the worst candidate for us? it’s almsot like they want the Democrat to win! *rolls eyes*


21 posted on 12/31/2011 8:51:45 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Gingrich/Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
yep, I agree there are no moderates, only people who can be persuaded to vote for either party by someone compelling.

And Romney like McCain, Dole, and a long list of losers is anything but compelling. Boring and dull come to mind.

22 posted on 12/31/2011 8:53:53 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Gingrich/Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Gee, it’s hard to believe the msm would have any reason to pick the worst candidate for the republican voters. My world is shattered. LOL.


23 posted on 12/31/2011 8:55:59 AM PST by Jukeman (God help us for we are deep in trouble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: newheart

Romney - the generic loser.


24 posted on 12/31/2011 8:58:59 AM PST by Jukeman (God help us for we are deep in trouble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative

They did the same thing in ‘08’ with McCain. Kid gloves, a lot of free air time before and during the primary, and long knives after the convention. I would bet money that Obama has at least a dozen ‘I lost my job because of Bain’ ads tee’d up ready to run as soon as Mitt wins.


25 posted on 12/31/2011 9:08:52 AM PST by redangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jukeman
"I’m not convinced there is any truth to the electability of Romney"

Most of us don't see it either.

I can't see him beating hussein. The ObamaCare issue gets neutralized out of the gate with romney. After that, there'll be mormon bashing taken to absurd levels.

26 posted on 12/31/2011 9:19:39 AM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Who cares about moderates, it’s Independents that count. They are about 30% of the population, according to Rassmuseen. They’ve called 15,000/month since 2009 for the survey.


27 posted on 12/31/2011 10:09:10 AM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty
The way the situation is going, odds are that Republicans won't take the Senate, will lose the House, and get their ass handed to them by Obama in '12.

What kind of odds are you giving and how much are you prepared to wager, or is this just another of the many gum flappers that float in and out of FR, making statements and then, when called, run for the tall weeds.

28 posted on 12/31/2011 10:10:26 AM PST by USS Alaska (Nuke The Terrorist Savages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jdub
".. any woman who has ever been cheated on is going to have to be a rock-ribbed conservative to pull the lever for Newt. For most, nothing else will matter."

I agree. Most women will not trust a man who is determined to be a serial cheater.

29 posted on 12/31/2011 10:32:33 AM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jukeman
Good Article: 7 Reasons Why Mitt Romney's Electability is a Myth (John Hawkins)

http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2011/12/27/7_reasons_why_mitt_romneys_electability_is_a_myth/page/full/

30 posted on 12/31/2011 10:36:07 AM PST by MissMagnolia (You can't fix stupid but you can vote it out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner
"Independent" is actually a status of registration ~ in Virginia since there is no registration by party that'd make us all "Independents" wouldn't it.

In reality, Independents are subject to the same political realities and districting mathematics as the rest of us. The greater polity cares little for your own attempts to classify or categorize yourself.

Active political life occurs within the frame work of parties, or internally within factions that themselves gravitate to the parties.

Our system of single member districts and first past the post election victories ensures that we will have ONLY TWO POLES OF REFERENCE.

If you are a pollster and you really want to see which way things are going you attempt to find out how your samples voted last time. You do that by stealth and trickery ~ just like you do it to discover brand preferences.

The business of political polling in multi-party Europe is probably just this side of Sisyphean ~ and there even the pollsters wait for the electoral results anxiously and are frequently surprised. They can detect only the broadest of movements.

But back to the Independents for a moment ~ they may well be free of direct party affiliation but they still live within the real world of organizations and natural classes that in their turn gravitate to the parties. Getting off the local party mailing lists does little to change your employment, religion, age, location, lifestyle, race, creed, color and so forth. Those factors continue to play an enormous part in how you will behave in the coming elections and there's not a whole lot you can do about it.

31 posted on 12/31/2011 10:37:09 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jdub

Or, they may realize that Newt is just their kinda’ guy, who they’re attracted to, and try to pull that lever over and over and over.


32 posted on 12/31/2011 10:40:37 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty
Most folks are brighter than that ~ they blame the current President for their current Predicament. Bush bashing can only go so far ~ and it obviously expired in 2010.

Obama is toast.

33 posted on 12/31/2011 10:43:28 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ez

“having him achieve the power of the Presidency might be just the recipe for a little PAYBACK”

You have articulated something I have wondered. Is all the negativism from some older members of congress a fear of retribution?

Personally, I don’t think Newt would shell out “payback”; it isn’t good politics and I trully think his “reformed” character would preclude it.

It is funny to watch the old timers squirm. Reminds me of the Bible verse (paraphrase) “the evil flee when no one is pursuing.”


34 posted on 12/31/2011 11:26:38 AM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson