Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 1 January 2012
Various driveby media television networks ^ | 1 January 2012 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 01/01/2012 5:35:11 AM PST by Alas Babylon!

The Talk Shows



January 1st, 2012

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): 2012 GOP presidential candidates Rick Perry, Ron Paul and Michele Bachmann.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): 2012 GOP presidential candidate Rick Santorum; Matt Strawn, Iowa GOP chairman.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky.

THIS WEEK (ABC): 2012 GOP presidential candidates Bachmann and Paul; Gov. Terry Branstad, R-Iowa.

STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Ron Paul; Branstad; Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dnc4romney; guests; lineup; msm4romney; patriotsantorum; sunday; talkshows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-222 next last
As always, soliciting FReeper comments, observations, and opinions.

Happy New Year, Amigoes!!!!

1 posted on 01/01/2012 5:35:18 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: acapesket; A.Hun; Aleya2Fairlie; aligncare; altura; Bender2; Bernard; bray; cajungirl; Carley; ...
This is the Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread Ping List! If you want to be on it, reply to this post or FReepmail me (in case I miss it). If you want to be taken off, simply send me a FReepmail.
2 posted on 01/01/2012 5:36:14 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
C-SPAN Radio, available on the net also, click here, broadcasts all five Sunday talk shows starting at 12:00 noon Eastern, as follows:

12:00 PM - 1:00 PM NBC's "Meet the Press"

1:00 PM - 2:00 PM ABC's "This Week"

2:00 PM - 3:00 PM "Fox News Sunday"

3:00 PM - 4:30 PM CNN's "Late Edition"

4:30 PM - 5:00 PM CBS's "Face The Nation"

Listen at the link above WHILE you FReep!

3 posted on 01/01/2012 5:37:08 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
Here are the email addresses or web pages for commenting to the weekend talk shows:

Meet the Press Meet the Press mailbox (web page for comments)

Face the Nation ftn@cbsnews.com

Fox News Sunday FNS@foxnews.com

ABC This Week thisweek@abc.com

CNN State of the Union CNN State of the Union (web page for comments)

4 posted on 01/01/2012 5:37:34 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All; bray

“The Sunday Morning Bray”, by Bray!

…and to godliness, brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness, LOVE. 2 Peter 1:7

Who does the stopping of the Keystone pipeline help the most? Sure it will bring Obozo some laundered greenie cult dollars thorough the usual suspects but where do the environazis get their money? And of course it will help the Saudis by forcing America to buy more of their oil but all of their oil is sold to any number of countries closer to them so they are pretty neutral. Sending the oil to China may hurt us but that oil will be used by the Chinese while still forcing them to buy world supply. The wealthiest man in the world is who needs that pipeline to point any direction but south, he is the world puppet master George $oro$.

He is heavily invested in the high risk deep water exploration off Brazil. He is the major investor in those deep water wells that are not permitted off our coasts, were developed with the understanding we would be their primary customer. When they were first being explored just after Obama was inaugurated and before the BP spill, Petrobras was having a hard time getting investments due to the low oil prices coming out of the Bush administration. If those investors dried up his company would be bankrupt in less than 30 days. To bring the Billions needed he had to have assurances we would be buying their oil and that the large investors would be pouring the necessary funds needed to drill before the first production well would be developed.

The amounts of money needed were enormous and especially in a world tight on finances and awash in oil so Georgie stood to lose his Billion$ he had invested. Fortunately he had an ace up his sleeve and forced Obama to loan him an additional $5 Billion and put a moratorium on Gulf exploration and development. Now nobody knows if it was incompetence or corruption but he knew he could get what he wanted and now comes a pipeline which can destroy his entire plan.

The Keystone pipeline would not only provide America with 2 million barrels per week but would provide the key refineries he wants to supply with a large percentage of their capacity at very attractive pricing. Canada’s transportation costs via pipeline vs the cost of loading shipping and unloading oil from Brazil does not pencil putting his production off sides. Not only does the Canadian oil start off lower due to the density of the oil but the transportation costs makes it an absolute winner for these refineries he needs to process his oil.

There is only one solution and that is to stop the pipeline using the same tactics he used on the Gulf moratorium. First he will tell the President to not sign the bill and force it to go to China which is out of his shipping feasibility, putting him against Middle East oil. Second, he would have his green cult declare it a dirty polluter and have protests and street theater in DC to make the people think stopping the pipeline is for their own good. He knows that the Green cult sells and he will just use the old Spotted Owl scare tactic and instantly all the Polar Bear huggers would shout their Stop the Oil chants. Finally, he will have his surrogate lawyers at Greenpeace and Sierra Club file lawsuits to kill the pipeline and effectively force Canada to build a pipeline East rather than South. Boehner accidently threw a wrench into his little plan.

This pipeline is perhaps the biggest threat on his wealth since the Britain failed to go into his planned depression. Now he has made out like a dentist at Dachau with this latest recession as he laughed all the way to Switzerland, but this one could be damaging. Unnamed sources inside his company say he owns somewhere in the neighborhood of 75% of Petrobras both above board and below and if were to tank he stands to make MF Global look like a lemonade stand. Even though he is in the top 1% of the 1% this could potentially be devastating to not only his finances but his power. He would have to explain to the entire world how he couldn’t control an incompetent and corrupt President he bought as well as most of a Sinate. He would lose major stature if he didn’t have the refining piece of the puzzle he desperately needs to feed the American market and feed funds to his laundry machine in the gummit.

The pipeline would force him to do one of two things, lose billions and become a laughingstock amongst the billionaires club or allow America to build more refineries. Neither of those options would play well for his investments since losing money and face results in losing money and building refineries would strengthen the dollar causing him to lose more money. He doesn’t always bet against the dollar but will do everything in his power to collapse it because as he says, the only thing standing between him and world communism is America. He thought he had solved that little irritant and now he is in a bit of a jam over Keystone.

He still has plenty of cards on the table but he never expected to have to be playing them yet. He thought the game was won when he got his year extension on the decision. This 60 day amendment in the bill is an irritant and is going to potentially expose him and his accomplices as being against the American people and for the Chinese. Fortunately, he has the $oro$ news network from Mediamatters.soros to NPRos however many understand who pays their paychecks as that they are on the same team. The new media is the group he is aware of, since if they sink their teeth into this and realize the Achilles tendon this pipeline represents he could be damaged severely if not destroyed. Now wouldn’t that be a pity.

This seemingly insignificant pipeline from our neighbors to the north is actually the biggest issue we have had since the Teapot Dome scandal. Not only does it represent a large step towards energy and economic freedom but the potential destruction of one of the biggest money machines the commiecrats enjoy. He has spread his money like an evil octopus controlling all the major leftists around the Country and the world. He is out on a limb with this investment as we saw when he forced the shutdown of the Gulf and the acquisition of all those drilling platforms. The BP spill allowed him access to equipment he would have never been able to use at discounted prices, how convenient.

He is a desperate man right now and doing whatever he can to make this happen beneath the surface and forcing the Global Warming crowd to sell one more round of snake oil. If the pipeline is approved his entire empire could fall like a house of cards just like every other Ponzi we have witnessed over the past couple of years. The irony would be delicious as would the breaking of the shackles he represents. Sierra Club, broke, PETA broke, Tides Foundation, busted, $oro$ media, closed and on and on as America once again becomes the land of freedom. The Keystone Pipeline would become Soros’ Tombstone.

Happy New Year

Note: The above opinion is not necessarily mine, but FReeper Bray’s. If you wish to discuss this, please ping Bray.


5 posted on 01/01/2012 5:38:13 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Happy New Year to all the Patriots at FR.

Much love and many warm wishes from Ohio to each of you.


6 posted on 01/01/2012 5:39:24 AM PST by DollyCali (Don't tell God how big your storm is... tell your storm how BIG your God is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
Sunday Talk Shows:

Where for art thou, Newt? Where for art thou?

7 posted on 01/01/2012 5:44:27 AM PST by InterceptPoint (TIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
Where for art thou, Newt? Where for art thou?

Newt: 'I'm falling, and I can't get up!'

[Watch out below. Newt's poll numbers are falling fast. He is now challenging for 5th place in IA.]
8 posted on 01/01/2012 5:54:00 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Wishing all FReepers a Happy, Healthy & Prosperous New Year!


9 posted on 01/01/2012 5:54:50 AM PST by Bushbacker1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

I would not put past the driveby media to not invite him.

They don’t want him to be our nominee; they want Romney to be.

They do not want Obama to lose come November, so they promote the Republican they think they’re most likely to beat: Romney.


10 posted on 01/01/2012 5:55:26 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

F&F promo for FNS with Wallace...

They were basically concluding that Perry doesn’t stand a chance and should drop out now.

Santorum is the new wonderboy, flavor of the week.


11 posted on 01/01/2012 5:57:52 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Chris Wallace should do what’s right and drop out of Fox News Sunday. Maybe he can take his fathers job.


12 posted on 01/01/2012 6:04:04 AM PST by McGruff (Hold the House, retake the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bray
Good job on this one, Bray. May 2012 be the year that sees the Soros evil empire crash and burn.
13 posted on 01/01/2012 6:07:29 AM PST by JPG (Growing old is mandatory; growing up is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
They do not want Obama to lose come November, so they promote the Republican they think they’re most likely to beat: Romney.

I agree that Romney will have an uphill battle to try to defeat Obama. However, Gingrich and his baggage would have an even tougher battle.

The reason Gingrich's numbers are falling like rocks is because it took him 5 months after announcing to even reach double digits. He was sort of the next default go-to after Cain dropped out. Many younger people did not realize Gingrich's history and his EPIC FAIL in the late 90s. As facts about him came to light [aka, attack ads], many did not like what they were seeing.

Next up -- Santorum and Paul.

==

Wow. How weak is the GOP field? So far, Palin, Trump, Romney, Bachmann, Perry, Cain, and Gingrich have managed to rise to the top of the lists, only to sink. Now Paul and Santorum are nearing the top.

If Huntsman can just hang in there a while longer, he could end up being the last candidate standing/rising.
14 posted on 01/01/2012 6:10:52 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!; All
Y'ALL!

HAPPY NEW YEARS!

15 posted on 01/01/2012 6:13:14 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER ( Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!; bray

Tremendous stuff today from bray. Right on the mark.


16 posted on 01/01/2012 6:16:34 AM PST by PaleoBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Ugh...

Paul on now with Wallace, can’t stand either one of them.


17 posted on 01/01/2012 6:19:11 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER ( Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
...many did not like what they were seeing.

And our manipulative "news" media are carefully keeping from tv viewers the actual physical size and shape of candidate Gingrich. He is old and fat and unappealing, and we have not had a president that looked that way since Taft, iirc.

The full frontal and profile views are being reserved for when/if he actually becomes a contendah.

18 posted on 01/01/2012 6:21:00 AM PST by maica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Chris Wallace is a real piece of work, Fox is sucking big time.


19 posted on 01/01/2012 6:22:25 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

Unfortunately I agree with him on guaranteed health insurance coverage for AIDS patients. Why should healthy insurables be denied affordable premiums just to subsidize very expensive unhealthy behavior.


20 posted on 01/01/2012 6:24:26 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER ( Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Morning AB, All

Let me start with the obvious...Happy New Year to All.

As always, special wishes to you AB for doing this thread. Here’s hoping you continue thru 2012.

I have two NY resolutions. One is to get confirmed in my Catholic faith. When I was a young Catholic girl, my parents got divorced and I was always being moved back and forth to schools. I always seemed to miss the Bishop by one year.

Second, I will, for the first time in my life, purchase and learn how to use a gun.

Those are my concrete resolutions. On a more abstract trend, I plan to improve my cooking skills, to cull all the frou-frou from my life to a simple, but happy life, and, as always, to be a better person.

Read an interesting article that I will excerpt and comment on later in the thread. For now the endless analyses of the year just passed.


21 posted on 01/01/2012 6:25:34 AM PST by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

Michelle Bachmann up now.


22 posted on 01/01/2012 6:25:48 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER ( Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
"How weak is the GOP field?"

Where do you come up with this nonsense? The GOP field is stronger than anything the dRats have come up with in the last decade, at least. Stop listening to the "has beens" in the beltway cocoon.

23 posted on 01/01/2012 6:27:23 AM PST by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

Yeah Chris Wallace did nothing but got ya questions with Paul now softballs to MB.


24 posted on 01/01/2012 6:28:52 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Fishtalk

Howdy Pat, Happy New Year.

Bachmann hasn’t run any TV ads in Iowa since August, campaign running on fumes. She’s dead last.

Michelle never hesitates for a second on answering any question.

Wallace berating her on earmarks.


25 posted on 01/01/2012 6:29:37 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER ( Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: McGruff; Alas Babylon!
Chris Wallace, Mitt Romney's FOX Pimp,
begins his wide-field attacks
for his beloved RINO, the ineligible Romney.

Romney's Wallace begins by ignoring every poll against Romney
and EVEN THEN the Romney pimp 'sauces' the results.

FOX begins its propaganda on the GOP candidates
"Confident", FOX New's Wallace declares, is Romney.
"Well respected", FOX New's Wallace declares, is Romney

Only backed by "religious conservatives" is Santorum.

"Planning for his comback" is Gingrich.

"Near the top" is Paul.
"Dangerous" is Paul

Ron Paul "Interview":
Psychotic Paul purports he gets widespread "foreign policy support".

Will Wallace discuss this? or "nuclear Iran"?
Absolutely NOT
With all the foreign policy idiocy, Wallace focuses ... on homophobia of Paul (to ingratiate to Romney ).

Ms. Bachmann "Interview":
Wallace then begins another of his "interviews" discussing
the ONLY poll that ever showed Romney ahead, over and over.
Every question Wallace gives appears to refer ONLY
to THAT poll so that Wallace can purport
RINO Romney is "in the lead", over and over.

Hyperbiased Wallace appears to again only focus on questions given him by Team Romney.

FOX News.
Biased from the start. SO BIASED they must purport they are not.

26 posted on 01/01/2012 6:30:18 AM PST by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
Hmmm.. (practically) Everyone; but Newt, on the BOOB tube
w/ (the Establishment) chattering class today. :-\

27 posted on 01/01/2012 6:34:26 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (I can take tomorrow, $pend it all today. Who can take your income, tax it all away. Obama Man can. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Thanks for the thread. Back after coffee.


28 posted on 01/01/2012 6:35:02 AM PST by altura (Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Gingrich's dive began right after he said he'd bring federal judges before Congress in order for them to explain their decisions. I have no problem with this, except when I imagine the Congress being democrat controlled and the judge being a conservative who made a conservative decision. We all too often aplaud such things when a Republican does them but forget what happens when the democrats get back in power...

Take for example the Patriot Act enforcement under George Bush, as opposed to it now being under Obama and Janet Napolitano (SHUDDER).

Newt has a political tin ear, in my opinion. Stuff like this happened in the 90’s as well. He makes a statement like this, and (you know it will happen) the driveby’s and the democrats go ballistic, taking it all out of context and coming up with headlines that seem to make Newt look like a lunatic, as below:

“Gingrich's attack on the courts takes on the Constitution, too “

“Gingrich's assault on divided powers”

“Congress should direct US Marshals to apprehend judges”

“Gingrich threatens the judges”

Now you and I might very well understand what Newt is saying here, and even agree with it, but to the average wishy-washy voter out there, it sound like he's off his rocker.

So I don't know what to say about Newt. I could be happy to have him as president, but he really, really needs someone who is media astute to bounce his utterings off of before he makes them.

29 posted on 01/01/2012 6:38:44 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Perry up now, Wallace asking him to drop out.

Wallace pounding him about weak campaign, earmarks. Perry looked kinda like he had to pee, couldn’t sit still.

Maybe his back is feeling better.

Perry wants to debate Obama, say he will come early.


30 posted on 01/01/2012 6:40:00 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER ( Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

But, Daddy is dead!?... Is voting Democrat still, even in he!!. :-\


31 posted on 01/01/2012 6:41:06 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (I can take tomorrow, $pend it all today. Who can take your income, tax it all away. Obama Man can. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: altura

Santorum hitting homer after homer on MTP. Schooling DNC Dave.


32 posted on 01/01/2012 6:42:17 AM PST by chiller ( Elect another batch of TPartiers and it won't matter which R we elect. WE will lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage
"How weak is the GOP field?"

Where do you come up with this nonsense? The GOP field is stronger than ...


Still standing:


Yeah, that line up is a powerhouse.

The only one with any substantial executive experience is Perry, and he is challenging Gingrich for 5th place in IA.

33 posted on 01/01/2012 6:45:48 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
Man, DNC Dave is just hatin’ and lyin’ on Rick Santorum like he's a leper with bo.—he really sounds desperate.
Rick made him look like the biased tool he is is.

Come Jan 21st, RS has MY vote.

34 posted on 01/01/2012 6:45:55 AM PST by Happy Rain ('The GOP establishment thinks a conservative can't win--Liberal Democrats KNOW conservatives win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fishtalk

LOL!....Food channel helps.. I even burn water. B-)


35 posted on 01/01/2012 6:45:55 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (I can take tomorrow, $pend it all today. Who can take your income, tax it all away. Obama Man can. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
Watched Ron Paul and goodness I'm no Ron Paul fan. But I totally agreed with him that homosexuals bring their fate too often upon themselves with their risky lifestyle.

Took courage to say that; kudos to Paul.

Then I listen to Chris Wallace follow up and I do some thinking. For Wallace asks Paul a question, a very loaded question: "Do you think that homosexuals should be denied health insurance?" he asked.

My first response, indignantly, was "HE DIDN'T SAY THAT!" Indeed Paul's first response was, duh, "I didn't say that."

Indeed Paul said nothing even remotely like that and I fumed. Wallace was being a dopey lamestream media type, insinuating himself into the story via loaded question.

So I wondered, well what would have been the proper way to couch that question without sounding accusatory? The way Wallace phrased that question made it sound like he was just re-formulating a question Paul had asked in the past.

He, and his allegedly impartial minions in the media, COULD have said, to the effect...."Since you allege that homosexual diseases might well be a result of their lifestyle, do you also take the position that they shouldn't be able to get health insurance.?"

The above is better phrased and makes it clear that such an assertion had never been made by the questionee.

It's how they form the news, those dishonest prideless journalists. Even Chris Wallace.

In the first question a casual listener, the sort who only listen to political discourse on sleepy Sundays, Meet the Press, that kind of thing, would walk away thinking that just damn.....that Ron Paul really is a kook, asserting homosexuals shouldn't get health insurance.

No matter what the dishonest media would have you believe, the vast majority of boobaloobs out here in America don't wish any harm to our homosexual breathren, but we're not all that keen on special programs to underwrite their risky behavior or allowing them to get married.

By this nefarious campaign the dishonest media undertakes for their own glory, they make candidates, especially Republicans, look like nut cases.

Sorry to get so long for my thoughts but....see below. ;)


36 posted on 01/01/2012 6:47:14 AM PST by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!; bray; All
Thanks for the thread AB and Happy New Year to everyone here especially those who post on this thread week after week.

....................................................

Don't know if I buy all of this since its going to be a while before the US is energy self sufficient if even in my lifetime. We will still be buying huge quantities of oil from someone and if the choice is the Saudis, Iran,Venezuela or Brazil, Brazil may wind up with a market share.Simply by being the best of the worst.

I do however realize the Soros /zero relationship as slave owner/ slave. Zero will do his bidding but if Keystone gets too pricey,politically,which is all that matters in the regime,if we do our job well enough, zero may try and say yes to the pipeline while sabotaging it under the table and hoping for the best.

Bray is right in one area Zero never gives into us no matter what the consequences. So far he has been able to spin his way out of every misdeed but that won't work forever.

37 posted on 01/01/2012 6:48:06 AM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fishtalk

DON’T SHOW THE GUN TO THE BISHOP!


38 posted on 01/01/2012 6:48:52 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER ( Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Obama has to be defeated or the US will no longer exist. Simple as that. That’s why Soros is betting where his money is placed.


39 posted on 01/01/2012 6:50:11 AM PST by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Newt’s lack of organizational skills in the campaign my be his achilles heel.That and the RNC destroying everyone in VA.


40 posted on 01/01/2012 6:50:34 AM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

Three tickets out of Iowa? I think 4, Newt will be in the hunt too.


41 posted on 01/01/2012 6:51:18 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Rand Paul is on the talk shows this morning to cut down
Gingrich and tell the world no Tea Partier should vote for him, they should all vote for his old man.

I heard him the other day on CNN. Newt, Newt, Newt, bad,
bad, bad, etc.


42 posted on 01/01/2012 6:51:38 AM PST by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Newt will destroy RINO Romney in SC.


43 posted on 01/01/2012 6:53:13 AM PST by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

The Palin /Rubio ticket is sadly missing here. I think they saw the handwriting on the wall as well and both decided to sit this one out. I still say the election is ours to lose. You can’t fool the people forever.


44 posted on 01/01/2012 6:54:27 AM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: chiller

Santorum was good, but the makeup and hair thing doesnt work for him. He looked like a fag.


45 posted on 01/01/2012 6:55:07 AM PST by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: McGruff; Alas Babylon!
Chris Wallace, Mitt Romney's FOX Pimp,
leads the FOX pro-Romney Discussion Group for Ailes and Soros.

Their conclusion is best summarized by the New York Times attendee.
FOX News (Biased from the start) declares that
Romney will "win Iowa" NO MATTER THE OUTCOME.

Astonishingly, before the break,
Wallace threatens Iowans that they may not "deserve"
to be the 'first' primary vote
in the future [presumably how they vote for RINO Romney].

FOX News. Biased from the start.
SO BIASED they must purport they are not.



46 posted on 01/01/2012 6:55:33 AM PST by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Newt has a political tin ear, in my opinion.

%%%%%%

Newt is almost in an Asperger’s category with people skills.


47 posted on 01/01/2012 6:55:56 AM PST by maica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

A guy I already forgot about, saying people will soon forget about Iowa. (Huntsman)


48 posted on 01/01/2012 6:56:07 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER ( Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Fishtalk

We live in a pc world where truth is beaten back until its a distant memory.


49 posted on 01/01/2012 6:56:25 AM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain
I'm with you HR, but I worry endlessly because Andrea Mitchell does not agree with us. BBBBWAAAHHHAA.

What a good indicator, actually !

50 posted on 01/01/2012 6:56:37 AM PST by chiller ( Elect another batch of TPartiers and it won't matter which R we elect. WE will lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-222 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson