Michele Bachmann: No Matter What Happens in Iowa We're not Dropping Out

Daily Caller ^ | 01/02/12 | Alex Pappas

[Paul Ross]

You deny why?

He doesn't.Newt contradicts self on climate change

[Paul Ross]

You deny why?

He doesn't.Newt contradicts self on climate change

[Paul Ross]

Ah, another Newtie. Wake up, and face reality. He is DEAD, Jim! And its a good thing, too. He is not a conservative. Glenn Beck nailed him to the wall. He is a progressive.

[Paul Ross]

You deny why?

He doesn't.

Newt contradicts self on climate change

[Cobra64]

Bachmann is a good conservative fighter, but she may have fought too hard to no avail. But her money is drying up and Palin fans won’t forgive her for Rollins.

Yup. Even after she was warned, she continued bashing everyone else except Romney.

She was pathetic in the last debate as well, proving once again she doesn't get her facts straight and then announces she's "serious about running for President."

BTW, I was a big Bachmann supporter until the bashing started.

[Paul Ross]

This is This is expecially interesting about Newt's new book...

[dforest]

I agree Michele got too overzealous from the start. I also agree she doesn’t have much of a chance.

Earlier today I was listening to Huckleberry on FOX say a person can pretty much stay at it if the money is still there. Those without it are pretty much doomed at this stage.

I disagree with him quite often, but I don’t in regards to this issue.

[ez]

Romney’s top ten financers are banks and Wall St houses. If thr same people are financing Michele, I think we can safely say they are intentionally, and successfully splitting the conservative vote.

[mmanager]

Glenn Beck? Really? He is a fruity as Ron Paul.

Come talk to me in two months and you are going to be eating your words. Newt get’s the southern states and he is going to bury everyone. Iowa and New Hampshire is for the rookie’s. The best is to come.

[dforest]

Well then, I suggest everyone drop out that is a conservative or not really one, but Rick Santorum.

Then it would be Rick and Mitt. No conservative split. I would have to say Newt, Ron Paul, and Perry are the chief offenders since they take a larger portion of votes. If all of them dropped out, Santorum, a conservative, would win for sure.

Go Rick!
Michele doesn’t take enough to matter.

[ez]

In national polls, Mitt and Newt are still in a class of their own, with Paul trailing and the rest on life support. I don’t think Newt will be gone soon, but I think Bachmann and Huntsman will. They are throwing cash away.

[BfloGuy]

If she keeps going shes not going to be able to fight off the nasty attack from the left in her home turf.

That's a very good point that I hadn't considered. I don't think she'd make a great president, but I'd hate to lose her in the House.

[presently no screen name]

Beating the old dead horse of Bachmann for being "in cahoots" with Romney reveals a desperation to see Newt elected.

Now don't you think that was mitt's plan all along. Conservatives would believe the character of MB before Newt?

What you are implying are conservatives - while believing in conservative values - are pure as the driven snow and leave their political ambition and ego at the door. That thought leaves a door open to being deceived. And when they come to that realization - it's already too late. The game was apparent when MB and mitt walked onto the stage of the first debate. I don't need to know who bought the knife that stabbed me in the back - I just that I was stabbed.

Do you actually think mitt has been knitting all these years instead of preparing for another run at 'what is his' in his own mind? His plan was being designed and put in place and sprang on the unsuspecting ones - many still don't see it because it was designed to do just that. Keep them hung up on rhetoric while the game is being played out.

You actually think mitt, with all his known flip flops and liberal big gov't ways and romneycare hanging around his neck would enter a race - especially at this time - without being buffered on all sides from being attacked on his record? Who are his greatest enemy? Conservatives? Wouldn't the OBVIOUS step be to get one or two to be his buffer on stage during the debates? Isn't that how evil comes in - by deception and surrounding itself by it's own mouthpieces while it stands smiling and poised? Not that they agree with him but stand in the way of being kicked to the curb by the other candidates? Mitt should have been diced up and served back to the liberal camp where he belongs on that first debate. He had NO right to that GOP stage with his romneycare big gov't homo necklace he wears. And when some took out their knives, MB either attacked them at the onset or interrupted them with her rheortic - to bring attention away from it. Her attorney skills in action.

From the GOP elite, the media and some 'conservative' voices? What's the common denominator - to deceive the voters. Which one of the 3 kicked mitt to the curb? Which one protected him from being kicked to the curb? How many endorsements did mitt seeking after and 'got' from who we consider conservative? Those are the ones who are seeking political gain - and compromised conservative values. Tell me that has not happened and MB is no different than them. The game is so old - but the players are new and what was needed is some of those players that conservatives believed in.

I believe in Truth - and Truth fights evil, it doesn't buffer it or come against those who are fighting it.

You believe what you want and need to soothe you - I have no problem recognizing that evil exists and it's greatest accomplishment is worming itself in the midst of what one would consider good. It needs that cover to survive.

[Leto]

If she is such a stalwart conservative then why has she been attacking everyone to the right of Romney, while wearing knee pads for him?

[Paul Ross]

It doesn't matter who wins, the words I have expressed are true. Newt is not a conservative. Wake up.

And ask yourself this...where is Newt Romney on Obama's eligibility? Why does Newt Romney run from the subject?

Because Progressives will not defend the Constitution, that 'outdated document'.

No matter what the People's majority want. They must be "outdated" too, eh?

[Paul Ross]

She isn’t. You have apparently missed her numerous attacks in the last two months alone. Newt Romney is not being let go.

[Paul Ross]

Bachmann is needed more in the White House. In the Congress she is routinely ignored by the RINO elitists such as Boenher and Cantor. Did you see Cantor’s creepy fraudulent historical description of why Jews side with the Democrats?

[MayflowerMadam]

What I like about Bachmann is that she knows intimately the threats to America, as she’s on the House Intelligence Committee. She’d be more up to speed than any of the other candidates, and could hit the ground running. That, added to the fact that she’s committed to our security, would be good.

What gives me a “hinky” feeling is her statements that she’s in subjection to her husband. (I don’t need a sermon on “subjection” in marriage; as a Baptist P.K., I’ve heard/seen it all and I get it.) If she had two options on a decision and is leaning the correct way, but hubby advises the other, what would she do?