Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FINAL CURTAIN: OBAMA SIGNS IMDEFINITE DETENTION OF CITIZENS INTO LAW AS FINAL ACT OF 2011
JonathanTurley.org ^ | January 2, 2012 | Jonathan Turley

Posted on 01/02/2012 5:56:39 PM PST by Yosemitest

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 next last
To: Yosemitest

But, he said he won’t use it.

And there are no death panels.

And GM paid us back.

And Barry got Osama.

And he’s natural born and doesn’t have 19 different SSNs.


81 posted on 01/02/2012 9:13:26 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pipe Dog

4 later


82 posted on 01/02/2012 9:18:48 PM PST by Pipe Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

http://urbanlegends.about.com/b/2008/11/13/bogus-khrushchev-quote-makes-the-rounds-again.htm


83 posted on 01/02/2012 9:20:49 PM PST by willamedwardwallace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Granted, the general gist of the quote was real... the Soviets certainly intended to subvert our system of government and replace it with communism. However, there is no original source that directly points to this quote ever being directly uttered.

It doesn’t ever help to spread urban legends to prove a point, because these are the types of things that the left will latch onto to make our side look stupid.


84 posted on 01/02/2012 9:20:57 PM PST by willamedwardwallace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheBigJ

But that bill doesnt eliminate the right an accused citizen would have to an appeal or trial before losing their citizenship. They could still appeal just like in any other accusation and it would have to be proven ina court of law that they provided material support to a terrorist organization or actively and purposefully engaged in hostilies.


85 posted on 01/02/2012 9:21:32 PM PST by emax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

http://books.google.com/books?id=NCOEYJ0q-DUC&lpg=PA59&ots=hASuXzC_GF&dq=%22You%20Americans%20are%20so%20gullible.%20No%2C%20you%20won%E2%80%99t%20accept%20communism%20outright%2C%20but%20we%E2%80%99ll%20keep%20feeding%20you%20small%20doses%20of%20socialism%20until%20you%E2%80%99ll%20finally%20wake%20up%20and%20find%20you%20already%20have%20communism.%20We%20won%E2%80%99t%20have%20to%20fight%20you.%20We%E2%80%99ll%20so%20weaken%20your%20economy%20until%20you%E2%80%99ll%20fall%20like%20overripe%20fruit%20into%20our%20hands.%22&pg=PA59#v=onepage&q=%22You%20Americans%20are%20so%20gullible.%20No%2C%20you%20won%E2%80%99t%20accept%20communism%20outright%2C%20but%20we%E2%80%99ll%20keep%20feeding%20you%20small%20doses%20of%20socialism%20until%20you%E2%80%99ll%20finally%20wake%20up%20and%20find%20you%20already%20have%20communism.%20We%20won%E2%80%99t%20have%20to%20fight%20you.%20We%E2%80%99ll%20so%20weaken%20your%20economy%20until%20you%E2%80%99ll%20fall%20like%20overripe%20fruit%20into%20our%20hands.%22&f=false


86 posted on 01/02/2012 9:24:24 PM PST by willamedwardwallace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: emax

>>>It is very likely they would if the govt truly tried to detain a random number fo US Citizens because they didnt like what they said or simply because, for instance, they took part in Teap Party or OWS movements. SCOTUS has ruled these kinds of detentions as unconstitutional several times before.<<<

I don’t think they’ll do the old Stalinesque trick of having every city arrest 100 people at random to instill terror. I think they’ll carefully assess who to arrest, and at what moment, and skillfully manipulate the message and media in order to make it clear that the state is not to be questioned. All it took for many years was popping Randy Weaver’s wife and burning a church filled with “cultists.” Modern media will inflate the few picked as examples so it will seem like 100 people at random in every city. Gosh, keep your guns, listen to Rush, go and pray. As long as you your complaints are impotent and your guns are in the closet, they won’t mind at all.


87 posted on 01/02/2012 9:25:02 PM PST by redpoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

and Seal Team Six is still alive.


88 posted on 01/02/2012 9:39:04 PM PST by Hoosier-Daddy ( "It does no good to be a super power if you have to worry what the neighbors think." BuffaloJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

At the “discussed earlier” link in Turley’s article above -
comments [appx.200] are for the most part by libs. They are livid over this law; are disgusted with Obama, and the universal tone is that this action of Obie’s is the last straw.

Another theme - horrifying - is that many of them plan to register as Republicans so they can vote in the primaries, for Ron Paul! They want Paul to get the nomination - then they’ll use him as their means to vote Obama out. Paul would then be their very own anti-war, anti-Obama savior - and one who’s definitely not an evil Republican. They don’t care that Paul’s a racist, since Obama’s a racist and nobody seems bothered by it. [nobody but Republicans and conservatives] A bit of liberals’ true colors showing through on the race score.


89 posted on 01/02/2012 9:49:27 PM PST by GGMac ((lesson learned re Obie: parse every sentence, every word, every gesture, every photo))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter

“A person who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States...”

Too much latitude for interpretation here. What are associated forces? What kind of hostilities?

OWS is a loose association that was hostile at times. Will they still get due process if they reconvene and become violent?


90 posted on 01/02/2012 10:21:58 PM PST by Rennes Templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

Did you read the part that says it doesn’t apply to citizens of the United States, lawful resident aliens, or those captured within the borders of the United States?


91 posted on 01/02/2012 10:27:44 PM PST by RightFighter (It was all for nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter
You missed it. Read the original article again.
92 posted on 01/02/2012 10:37:39 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter
Read post #92.
93 posted on 01/02/2012 10:38:49 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

mark


94 posted on 01/02/2012 10:40:17 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
It takes more than a president to get this crap enacted.

That observation deserves repetition.
95 posted on 01/02/2012 10:52:44 PM PST by Jay Santos CP ("Idiocracy"... It's no longer just a movie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

and his own base who would be storming the white house if it were Bush doing this is completely silent.... Liberals are proving themselves to be unprincipled hypocrites and foolish tools of big government enslavement.


96 posted on 01/02/2012 10:53:11 PM PST by Typical_Whitey (Democrat socialist engineering of America is treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: willamedwardwallace
Rule number ONE: Liberals Lie! So don't trust your "books google.com source".



97 posted on 01/02/2012 11:09:36 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

I haven’t a clue what else to say.

Perhaps my tag-line may provide an avenue to assuage your - and mine - misery?


98 posted on 01/02/2012 11:29:42 PM PST by raygun (http://bastiat.org/en/the_law DOT html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

Yes, since the govt would have to prove that this bill applies to them in a court of law first-esp since the bill was intended to apply only to someone who either was a member or provided support to Al Qaeda, Taliban or an affiliated Terror outfit or had a direct role in 9/11. Then they would have to come to a sort of consensus on whether or not existing law allows for their detainment-since again, this bill states that the laws regarding detaining US citizens and legal aliens are the same as they were before. And whether or not existing law and our current state of conflict allow for detention and suspension of Habeus Corpus is highly debated, thus clearly contestable in a court of law. So in a way, they would get due process-if the govt was still interested in playing by the rules and following the laws. If they werent, then NDAA 2012 would be wholly irrelevant anyway,


99 posted on 01/03/2012 12:46:08 AM PST by emax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man; potlatch; devolve; ntnychik; dixiechick2000

100 posted on 01/03/2012 12:54:45 AM PST by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson