Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michele Bachmann: Never mind Iowa, I’m in it for the long haul
Hotair ^ | 01/03/2012 | Tina Korbe

Posted on 01/03/2012 6:46:33 AM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Psalm 73
Thanks. What I would really like to see is a total revamp of the primary process. As much as I like the people of Iowa and New Hampshire, I believe they have too much influence in the current process. It's not really fair for the people of Texas and California (to name a couple of states) to have the nominee already decided for them before they even get a chance to vote.

What I propose is a series of three "national" primaries occurring in say February, April and June. Now when I say national, I'm really talking about 50 separate state primaries (or caucuses if a state so chooses) held on the same day - three times.

I think this would add a lot of excitement to the process and get more people involved.

The first primary should be more of a weeding out process. Basically have it where you need a certain percentage of the vote (say 10%) to move on to the second primary. This primary shall have no delegates awarded.

The second primary (held around April) will award 50% of the available delegates on a proportional basis. This way, it will not be possible for a nominee to be selected but we will have a clear idea by now who the top tier of candidates are.

The third and final primary should be held in June. This primary would award the remaining 50% of the delegates on a proportional basis. If a candidate has amassed over 50% of the TOTAL delegates, he/she will go to the convention as the nominee. If no candidate has 50% of the total, then we will determine the nominee at the convention and candidates with smaller delegate totals will be in the position to release their delegates to the candidate they feel will best represent the party.

I believe this process will result in a much better quality nominee.

Let it be so!

21 posted on 01/03/2012 7:42:37 AM PST by SamAdams76 (I am 34 days away from outliving Marty Feldman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

I agree whole heartly. Iowa and New Hampshire have way to much influence and do not speak for the whole country. This whole process is so upside down. thanks for your thoughtful post. Denco


22 posted on 01/03/2012 7:45:48 AM PST by denco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It seems that for some folks, the political process, and the adulation of average folks on the stump, seems to be some kind of addiction.


23 posted on 01/03/2012 9:38:54 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Michele Bachmann never had a chance in h*ll of being a serious contender. All she is doing is diluting the Tea Party vote. Where is her money coming from?
24 posted on 01/03/2012 9:45:26 AM PST by McGruff (Hold the House, retake the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson