Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iowa GOP: Romney wins caucuses [Romney 30,015, Santorum 30,007]
CNN ^ | 1/4/12

Posted on 01/04/2012 12:09:20 AM PST by Slings and Arrows

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney beat former Sen. Rick Santorum by a margin of just 8 votes in the Iowa GOP caucuses, the chairman of the Iowa Republican Party announced early Wednesday.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: ia2012; karlrove; rove
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-183 next last
To: napscoordinator

“Well that is fine. I would be happy to have a boring boy scout after the crazy President we have had. I guess you are another Romney fan. Yuk, but I guess that is your right to be.”

Oh, come on. I’ve posted about 8,293 times of FR exactly how I feel. I don’t like Romney. Never have. I don’t trust him and I don’t know what he really believes or what he’d really do as President because he opens his mouth and a bunch of words come out... and that’s it.

But that doesn’t mean I have to like Santorum, either (and I don’t). In addition to being terminally bland (and I believe part of being a leader IS having charisma!), he doesn’t strike me as a particularly nice guy. Would I prefer him to Obama? You bet. Do I like him as a candidate? No.

ALL of our candidates are, to me, unacceptable.


101 posted on 01/04/2012 6:39:29 AM PST by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: AlanGreenSpam
I was very impressed with his speech: from the heart and without a teleprompter or notes.

Our current President isn't able to speak for three minutes to a classroom full of fifth graders without a teleprompter.

102 posted on 01/04/2012 6:43:15 AM PST by Hoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland
Amen. This caucus was actually, IMHO, a very good thing.

Rick Santorum surprised the pundits and he got his support because he rolled up his sleaves and worked hard and reached the people. And the people in Iowa honored and respected that, in addition of course to seeing his strong conservative positions.

And all of America saw it on display.

I hope he surges elsewhere and has the organization and the money to go on from here and continue. I will donate to him in order to help.

He gave a great speech at the end and I believe he will continue to garner support. Bachman should throw in behind him...Perry may have an outside chance starting in South Carolina, but at this point it would be great to see him throw in behind Rick Santorum as well.

If that happened, then by the time we reach South Carolina it will be a race between Gingrich (who is sounding more angy and vengeful...which will also serve to help Santorum as he goes into pure attack mode and Rick continues to reach the people)...anyhow you will end up with Rick and Gingrich really battling it out in South Carolina and Romney third there.

Then comes Florida and that will be the real test and bellweather in my opinion.

I did not like at all when Santorum threw in behind Spectre and threw Toomey under the bus. That still really bothers me at a deep level...but outside of that and some of his votes for earmakrs, Santorum has been solid in most other areas conservatively and will get the Tea Party backing.

We shall see.

I know this, any of them (outside of Paul's foreign policy) would be orders of magnitude better than Obama, the avowed marxist who is openly destroying the free market and the pillars of the Republic as we watch. We literally, IMHO, cannot afford and perhaps not survive as a constitutional republic based on fundamental moral values with another four years of his damage.

103 posted on 01/04/2012 6:43:18 AM PST by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: princess leah

I think you got confused with the point I was making. Pick any name, put a D or an R after that name and you have some flavor of socialist.

I would not put my money or effort behind any candidate that that our lords and masters will select and ordain as the faces for us to “choose” from in November. Those faces are simpy fronts for the two wings of a political stage play that is bought and paid for just like the groceries in your cupboard. Everybody in this election is owned by somebody that is too busy running things to be bothered with the circus show that plays out for our amusement and abusement in DC.

Take a closer read at my tagline.


104 posted on 01/04/2012 6:44:18 AM PST by L,TOWM (Once you see that it is all Kabuki Theater, you are free to quit wasting your time on politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Pravious

If I knew you supported Romney, I would not have posted to you. Of course I know you are not a Romney fan. The race is not over, but I have to admit it is getting exciting. Anything can happen and will. You might get a more exciting candidate yet. I personally think Santorum is a great guy. Sure he probably can get “nasty” but all of us do from time to time. Bottom line, it ain’t over yet.


105 posted on 01/04/2012 6:44:51 AM PST by napscoordinator (President Santorum is our future! A miracle is happening before our eyes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA; Slings and Arrows; ari-freedom; PAConservative1; Carthego delenda est; P-Marlowe; ...
In reality and in PR value, whether Freepers like it or not, Mittens' people must know this is bad news for them.

And the Santorum campaign gets a huge boost under the sheets for money, venues and endorsements that will hold their fire for a while.

REALITY: 7 Romney, 7 Santorum, 7 Paul--so it's a tie...nothing changed in the delegate race, except Perry and Bachman voters are going to recede and vote for who next? Romney? Not likely.

PR VALUE: Read the headlines this morning: "Romney narrowly beats Santorum" "Romney edges past Santorum"

People (outside of FR) who pay little attention hear "That goodhair rich dude just barely beat who? Who is this Santorum guy?"

Will Santorum be able to build on it while Mittens is going all out but just barely treading water?

Meanwhile the caterwauling on FR is hilariously sad! My guy lost by a couple votes! Corrupt! Cheats! Well then how the hell did Paul get that many votes? Sometimes a cucumber is just a cucumber folks. If even Huntsman was out, Santorum "wins". What's the diff?

106 posted on 01/04/2012 6:50:59 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

Romney cannot win with only 25% of the vote, and 25% is all he will ever get. I would think that you would be happy that an actual conservative did as well as Santorum did, but for some reason you sound disappointed.


107 posted on 01/04/2012 6:57:09 AM PST by Hoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Luke21; This Just In; MaryLou1
There isn’t one drop of difference between Willard and Obama.

This is so idiotic. Mittens is certainly a lefty, east-coast blue-blood, but he's not a gaddam Marxist Islamist America Hater.

Slithering creeps who actually RUN the government like Napolitano, Holder, Sebelius, etc will be GONE no matter who wins on the GOP side.

That is 80% of the problem with Marxists running the bureaucracies. THAT is where executive power is.

Go ahead and stay home and let those bastards run the country in the ground so you can teach the GOP a lesson. You won't be allowed to revel in your smarmy "I told you so stories" in the "Obama II mandate" political correctness re-education camps.

108 posted on 01/04/2012 7:01:18 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

the way the not-romney candidates keep taking turns spiking up and getting brought down smacks of manipulation of public opinion by the media and romney team. the idea is that all will have had their moment and fallen, and romney gets the nomination, and the gop stays home in 2012 out of disgust.


109 posted on 01/04/2012 7:02:20 AM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

I assume the idea is to have the runner-up be a nobody, rather than someone like gingrich. heck, santorum is virtually unknown nationally. how can this guy pull 25% or whatever in iowa?


110 posted on 01/04/2012 7:04:49 AM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

Just nine votes away from conservatism.


111 posted on 01/04/2012 7:05:50 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg (Why, yes. I AM in a bad mood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kit cat
Nobody knows the game better than Newt? You have got to be kidding. Newt couldn't even manage to hold on to his Speakership when his own Party was in power. Knows the game? Newt is too damn lazy to know the game. He thinks he should win simply because he is Newt Gingrich - not because he works harder than everyone else. And now Newt will self-destruct because his ego has been hurt in his war with Mitt Romney.

Newt complains about the negative ads, but is too full of himself to realize that the charges are true. And now revenge is number one on his agenda. But Newt's self-destruction will be a good thing, because it will mean that a conservative wins the nomination instead.

112 posted on 01/04/2012 7:06:20 AM PST by Hoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
Whether Santorum won or lost by 1,000 votes, the end result would be the same: 7 delegates for Santorum and 7 for Romney. I`m not seeing the incentive for fraud over a couple hundred votes.

True, and I don't see the incentive, either. Romney was ahead in Clinton Cty. all evening, and that is likely where he made up the difference; meager, yes, but a win is a win. That said, the delegates ARE what matters, and Santorum had a remarkable showing.

At least I got a laugh out of the Soledad O'Brien and Romney interview on CNN this morning. She, who suffers a perseveration disorder called "stuck on Hispanic", and looks like she's hoarding nuts for the winter, could barely contain herself over Romney's alleged lack of support for Dream Act.

113 posted on 01/04/2012 7:06:46 AM PST by Calliecat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA; All
Sadly, many "conservatives" are so simple that they can be swayed by a single letter. They've never stopped to ask themselves what Republican they wouldn't vote for if they can be persuaded to vote for Willard Romney the open socialist.

There are millions of people all across this country who have registered and voted GOP their whole lives and think of themselves as conservatives, but who wouldn't last three days on FR without riding the lightning.

These are the Romney supporters. They like a candidate who is "conservative" in personality and image, not necessarily so much in ideology.

They are not that way because of secret mind control waves from Karl Rove. They are that way because it's what they really believe.

Those of you who think that Freepers or the Tea Party are the overwhelming majority of GOP voters and so should have an easy win in any primary contest need to wake up and smell the damn coffee. It ain't so. Not yet anyway, and maybe not for years.

As I have said again and again, it's easy to zot moderates and RINO's from FR. It is impossible to zot them from the GOP voting rolls. Only persuasion will work.

114 posted on 01/04/2012 7:11:46 AM PST by Notary Sojac (Liberalism: Ideas so good, they have to be mandatory!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

Looks like Mittens can rig up some dirty tricks.


115 posted on 01/04/2012 7:11:46 AM PST by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender! REMEMBER NEDA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
Meanwhile the caterwauling on FR is hilariously sad! My guy lost by a couple votes! Corrupt! Cheats!

Got that right. It's as pathetic as the DUmmies whining about Ohio in 2004. Some of the people on this thread are really losing their grip on reality.

116 posted on 01/04/2012 7:15:10 AM PST by Notary Sojac (Liberalism: Ideas so good, they have to be mandatory!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty
Who will lose to Obama IMO—sometimes I wonder if that’s why they want him.

That's exactly why they want him. Our nation is circling the drain and the GOP is more concerned over whose turn it is to run for President.

117 posted on 01/04/2012 7:19:24 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg (Why, yes. I AM in a bad mood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Bush V. Gore? FL?


118 posted on 01/04/2012 7:24:20 AM PST by USMAMULE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

Romney could win every primary and every caucus. He will not ever get a vote from me.


119 posted on 01/04/2012 7:24:52 AM PST by Grunthor (Do you worship the State or do you worship the Lord? There is no middle ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123

Unknown? The knock on him has been whether he can get the votes, not his experience or conservativism. He knocked it out of the park in Iowa.

He just got way more ‘known’ and is the frontrunner right now.


120 posted on 01/04/2012 7:25:58 AM PST by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

So the Two guys who beat Newt but lost (barely) to Mitt should get out of the way so that Newt can beat Mitt?

“Hello, my name is Logic and I do not believe that we have ever met.”


121 posted on 01/04/2012 7:29:58 AM PST by Grunthor (Do you worship the State or do you worship the Lord? There is no middle ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

Like they did with Cain who also said that he’d strip out PP funding?

Not sure what to say. He’s got the vote so far.


122 posted on 01/04/2012 7:32:10 AM PST by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: bert

“The far right has no chance.”

I didn’t have you pegged as a Rommney man.


123 posted on 01/04/2012 7:32:49 AM PST by Grunthor (Do you worship the State or do you worship the Lord? There is no middle ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

On to South Carolina. Mitt will not fare so well there. And Florida?

He probably will in NH.


124 posted on 01/04/2012 7:32:55 AM PST by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

I think Santorum will give Romney a battle in the Northeast.


125 posted on 01/04/2012 7:33:58 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

The only thing that surprises me is how close the totals were. SEVEN people, huh? I’m honestly just disgusted at this whole “primary” season, personally. I threw my hands up a few weeks back... I’m still peeking in hoping to see something I can get on board with, but I keep getting annoyed when I look and see the folks in the ring still, especially when I see the folks at the top (no offense to Santorum who is just the “latest flavor” in a VERY VERY weak field...).


126 posted on 01/04/2012 7:39:02 AM PST by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAConservative1

LOL - No doubt, huh?


127 posted on 01/04/2012 7:39:56 AM PST by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine; Luke21; This Just In; MaryLou1

Please tell me 3 major policy differences, “bold colors not pale pastels” if you will between Mitt Romney and Barak Obama.

Things they have DONE not things they have said.

When you cannot, you will see why many of us believe that the only real difference between the men is pigment.


128 posted on 01/04/2012 7:44:04 AM PST by Grunthor (Do you worship the State or do you worship the Lord? There is no middle ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I hope you are right. I plead ignorance about most of the North East.


129 posted on 01/04/2012 7:46:22 AM PST by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Kit cat

I sure hope you’re correct... The ONLY thing that could make me come around at this point is a candidate that packs a good punch (but remember to bring smelling salts for the public). It has to be devastating when he goes after these candidates, or I fear his personal baggage will weigh him down. He can’t be wishy-washy and he HAS to speak clearly - no fancy “agreements” just tell it like it is, period. He has to project himself through that smoke in the media and be non-apologetic for being angry... The PUBLIC is that angry, it’s time those representing us were. An HONEST-to-God “the buck stops here” surge/movement. Or else the slimy bastards in DC are going to get away with their scheming again (it may already be too late as it seems EVERYONE who steps forward has gotten neutralized in some way). All JMHO. I’m really pessimistic at this point in the game.


130 posted on 01/04/2012 7:48:01 AM PST by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
I think Santorum will give Romney a battle in the Northeast.

Red Hampshire has a 'gay marriage' law on the books...Santorum is NOT popular around here. I'd like to see him give Romnuts a run for his money, but I wouldn't hold my breath; especially with the open primary loading up with bored democrats...

131 posted on 01/04/2012 7:50:34 AM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

This means that Santorum really was the better candidate, because rOmney had to spend millions upon millions of dollars to get only 8 votes more.


132 posted on 01/04/2012 8:19:12 AM PST by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor; Luke21; This Just In; MaryLou1
Please tell me 3 major policy differences, “bold colors not pale pastels” if you will between Mitt Romney and Barak Obama.

Oh, I see. That's called comparing and contrasting. In other words what is similar and what is different.

Now that's a little more sane than this idiotic statement:

There isn’t one drop of difference between Willard and Obama.

Horsepuckey.

1) Mittens was born in DETROIT MICHIGAN in 1947 to a Republican Governor and Capitalist. The other one was born and raised somewhere else by America Hating anti-capitalist Islamist/Marxists and thinks Joe the Plumber ought to be raided like a piggy bank.
2) Mittens is for keeping terrorists from the battlefield in Gitmo. The other one pledged to shut Gitmo down, open civil courts to terrorists, and sell guns to Mexican drug cartels in order to increase gun restrictions on law abiding US citizens.
3) Willard's book is title "NO APOLOGY: THE CASE FOR AMERICAN GREATNESS" where he proclaims the concept of American Exceptionalism. The other one 'wrote' some books about how wonderful his drunken father's Marxist dreams were, how terrible, unfair and racist America's imperialism has been, married a woman who was ashamed of America all her life, abuses our allies and bows to any foreign head of state he can find.

Even if it were all for show, and even if all their "policy positions" were identical, the difference between a president who makes speeches about American Exceptionalism vs one who praises the Occutards is night and day.

Mitt Romney called for the resignation of Eric Holder on December 3 for his participation in a campaign to undermine 2nd Amendment rights (F&F.) Obama has expressed his utmost confidence in Holder. We can go on like this, but you don't want "three positions" or "three hundred."

You want a simple barb to maintain the simpleminded juvenile construct in your head that relieves you of the necessity of making a hard decision between imperfect and worst.

Leftists are proud of you for taking a "Zero Tolerance" attitude that you've learned well from them.

The same idiocy which expels a kid from school for a keychain with a picture of a gun on it is the type of rationale that claims Hussein Obama and -any- GOP candidate is identical.

Idiotic fools.

133 posted on 01/04/2012 8:23:34 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

Just who has a better voting record than Santorum?


134 posted on 01/04/2012 8:23:50 AM PST by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: byteback

That poll only adds up to 68%, which means 32% is still undecided.

Really, it’s still anybody’s race.


135 posted on 01/04/2012 8:25:55 AM PST by Brookhaven (Mitt Romney has been consistent since he changed his mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

I became aware of Red Hampshire in the late 1990’s, when really rabid left wing gay baby boomers left Californicator land to go live in and fornicate Gayhampshire.

More of these wretched people went to Gayhampshire during that time period than Ashland Or, Taos NM or in Colorado’s left wing meccas.

“Red Hampshire has a ‘gay marriage’ law on the books...Santorum is NOT popular around here!”


136 posted on 01/04/2012 8:32:13 AM PST by Grampa Dave (ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS DESTROYING AMERICA-LOOK AT WHAT IT DID TO THE WHITE HOUSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

I became aware of Red Hampshire in the late 1990’s, when really rabid left wing gay baby boomers left Californicator land to go live in and fornicate Gayhampshire.

More of these wretched people went to Gayhampshire during that time period than Ashland Or, Taos NM or in Colorado’s left wing meccas.

“Red Hampshire has a ‘gay marriage’ law on the books...Santorum is NOT popular around here!”


137 posted on 01/04/2012 8:32:30 AM PST by Grampa Dave (ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS DESTROYING AMERICA-LOOK AT WHAT IT DID TO THE WHITE HOUSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

Your post was eloquent and a joy to read unfortunately you missed the mark; “Things they have DONE not things they have said.”

IOW, Looking at both mens’ political records (not what they’ve said) name three major policy differences.


138 posted on 01/04/2012 8:33:42 AM PST by Grunthor (Do you worship the State or do you worship the Lord? There is no middle ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
They are both politicians you blithering idiot.

They don't DO anything but talk! That's their job.

People who think a single person is supposed to come in a "do" something to cure America are statist politburo types who believe in a centrally planned life for all Americans out of Washington.

Unlike idiot Perry's and Obama's remarks they DO NOT "create jobs."

JFK did not "go to the moon." Obama did not "kill bin laden". They made policy decisions and speeches about it.

If you want to play that game, Ronald Reagan authorized 12 million babies to be aborted during his term.

But again, you are no different than arguing with a horse. You can't comprehend anything you're hearing and you've got nothing but the same sh!t coming out day after day, and you don't think your sh!t stinks.

139 posted on 01/04/2012 8:44:47 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

I’m disappointed because Santorum is not a strong fiscal conservative, which makes him an incredibly vulnerable candidate.


140 posted on 01/04/2012 8:49:07 AM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123

Well, Huckabee was an unknown who took IA by a much larger margin in ‘08. So there’s certainly a historical precedent for this sort of thing.


141 posted on 01/04/2012 8:55:19 AM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

I don’t see Santorum gaining much traction beyond social conservatives. Which makes him a loser, because most people care far more about the country’s fiscal situation than about pro-life issues. Santorum doesn’t have a strong record when it comes to sound fiscal policy.


142 posted on 01/04/2012 8:59:11 AM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo
I don't know, shop around. The point is that Santorum's a statist and profligate big spender.
143 posted on 01/04/2012 9:03:00 AM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

“you blithering idiot.”

Do you truly expect anyone to read past that? If politicians did nothing but talk, this nation would never have existed, the civil war would have never been fought, the moon would have never been landed upon, the Soviet Union would have never been defeated.....etc.

I’m sorry that you had to come to the realization that there exists no true difference between the two socialists, and I am even more sorry that this caused you to lash out in an ugly manner.


144 posted on 01/04/2012 9:04:45 AM PST by Grunthor (Do you worship the State or do you worship the Lord? There is no middle ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

Listening to Iowa local talk radio...WHO’s Mickelson... seems there’s more than anecdotal evidence that the ‘Rats some of the Demonrat’s version of operation chaos went to Willard... If it were not for same-day registrations, I believe Santorum might have won - maybe even handily.

Mickelson just had a caller on who claimed her son, an “occupier”... went to his local caucus AND GOT ON THE PLATFORM COMMITTEE!!! Whiskey Tango Foxtrot... Oscar Mike Foxtrot Golf... That is whacked.


145 posted on 01/04/2012 9:05:48 AM PST by Keith in Iowa (No Mit Sherlock. No Mit, not now, not ever. | FR Class of 1998 |)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAConservative1

At least when I was watching he was just saying based on where the votes at the last minute were coming from, it seemed most likely that Romney would edge it.

I don’t think it was stolen.

Regardless, eight votes is tiny, and the headline is giving Santorum equal praise if not more so compared to Romney despite coming in second.


146 posted on 01/04/2012 9:08:45 AM PST by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

Rick Santorum is known for being a social issues guy, but he won Iowa talking about manufacturing and bringing jobs back, not gay “marriage” and baby killers.

Yes, he is a social conservative. Social Conservative does not equal stupid, he knows what the hot issues are. I am not saying “he’s the guy” especially since Perry is going to give South Carolina a shot but I’d crawl over molten glass to vote for him over Romney.


147 posted on 01/04/2012 9:09:07 AM PST by Grunthor (Do you worship the State or do you worship the Lord? There is no middle ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Country Patriot

He knew because the map showed which areas still had votes out. Therefore, he concluded a Romney win (he said by around a 100 votes, so it was a lot narrower than Rove even predicted) based on the results of precincts in the same area.

Don’t get this conspiracy theory. Besides, no need to whine about an eight-vote loss that really is a huge victory for a candidate who was in the single digits a few weeks ago.


148 posted on 01/04/2012 9:14:58 AM PST by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
I am even more sorry that this caused you to lash out in an ugly manner.

Boohoo. You call someone "identical" to an America-Hating Islamist Marxist and you're the one with the hurted fweeling? You say those words to my face and as you demand on your "about" page, I'd "kick your ass" pal.

This whining coming from a moron who claims there that he is in a blue state in "enema territory?"

Really. That's embarrassing.

You have the opportunity to co-opt people as allies, but you insist on making everyone out to be enemies. I for example am no fan of Romney, and I've said ove rand over, Romney vs Obama would be bad vs worst. Invading Iraq when we didn't know where the WMDs were was a bad or worse choice. Easy is it to sit back and criticize those who make tough choices.

By example, if it came to a street brawl between capitalists wearing Tea Party slogans and GOP t-shirts -versus- a bunch of Obama loving Occutards and I don't give a rat's ass how many primaries they've worked or log cabin republicans there are included, I'm fighting with them and against the Marxists.

You sit in your namby pamby rocking chair and say they're all the same, hoping the Occutards win the day so you can stick your tongue out at the imperfect republicans.

COWARD.

149 posted on 01/04/2012 9:22:46 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

Please tell me the three major policy differences in the political records of Romney and Obama.

Thank you.


150 posted on 01/04/2012 9:39:37 AM PST by Grunthor (Do you worship the State or do you worship the Lord? There is no middle ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson