Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Question For Iowans -- What Was Santorum's Position On Ethanol During The Caucus?
moi | 1-5-11

Posted on 01/05/2012 6:29:02 AM PST by Tribune7

Can anyone in Iowa tell me what Santorum said about bringing back ethanol subsides/saving mandates?

If he campaigned on doing that, I'm going back to Perry.

It's still ABR in the primary.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: energy; ethanol; mandates

1 posted on 01/05/2012 6:29:06 AM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2828884/posts

The answer is yes.


2 posted on 01/05/2012 6:43:25 AM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

I was wondering what you suggest the U.S. use as an oxygenate in our gasoline, since MTBEs were outlawed due to the fact that they are a proven carcinagen.


3 posted on 01/05/2012 6:44:37 AM PST by Iowa Granny (Clintion ruined a dress, but Obama ruined a Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
Search engines are your friends:

From last June:

Former Senator Rick Santorum (R-Penn.), who officially announced his candidacy for the presidency on Monday, wants to first phase out ethanol subsidies and then have the government provide incentives for flex-fueling stations.
http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/politics/blogs/republicans-continue-to-do-the-ethanol-dance

My view is that in the big picture, ethanol is not that important of an issue. Let's get a good leader with the right values elected, then educate him if necessary.

Rick Santorum looks very good to me, CERTAINLY as the only viable alternative to Newt McRomney.

Rick Perry had his chance...he is toast for this cycle. I wish he'd drop out.

4 posted on 01/05/2012 6:47:13 AM PST by PreciousLiberty (Real Hope - Santorum '12!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny
suggest the U.S. use as an oxygenate in our gasoline

Air.
5 posted on 01/05/2012 6:53:12 AM PST by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny
The US is currently mandating far more ethanol in our fuel then just the oxygenate requirements for those small areas requiring Reformulated Gasoline due to smog.


6 posted on 01/05/2012 7:06:50 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty
Search engines are your friends:

FreeRepublic is a better one as it appears Santorum did cozy up to the ethanolfare recipients & that might be the reason he clobbered Perry in Iowa.

Santorum will remain my second choice

7 posted on 01/05/2012 7:27:58 AM PST by Tribune7 (Vote Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marty60

thanks


8 posted on 01/05/2012 7:28:43 AM PST by Tribune7 (Vote Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny

If something is necessary neither mandate or subsidy is required.


9 posted on 01/05/2012 7:29:55 AM PST by Tribune7 (Vote Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny

“what you suggest the U.S. use as an oxygenate in our gasoline”

Same thing we used prior to 1992, nothing.


10 posted on 01/05/2012 7:33:02 AM PST by READINABLUESTATE ('illegal immigrant', 'outbreak', 'drill', 'strain', 'virus', 'recovery', 'deaths', 'collapse', 'huma)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

my question was about what should the alternative oxygenate be, if ethanol isn’t used.


11 posted on 01/05/2012 7:34:06 AM PST by Iowa Granny (Clintion ruined a dress, but Obama ruined a Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny

Ethanol is fine as the oxygenate. It is the millions of gallons above that minimal requirement that is the real problem.


12 posted on 01/05/2012 7:35:08 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

I distinctly remember Santorum saying that ethanol subsidies need to be eliminated. The funding would be cut every year for four years down to zero. This was probably in early November.


13 posted on 01/05/2012 7:36:00 AM PST by cornfedcowboy (Trust in God, but empty the clip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: READINABLUESTATE

It’s my understanding (correct me if I’m wrong) that MTBEs were used exculsively prior to ‘92,, at which time the Feds began phasing them out, after large amounts of MTBE residue were found in California’s drinking water. Later MTBEs were found to be carcinagenic, and were outlawed.

So going back to what was used in 1992 doesn’t appear to be realistic to me.

What am I missing?


14 posted on 01/05/2012 7:39:11 AM PST by Iowa Granny (Clintion ruined a dress, but Obama ruined a Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny

oxygenate is crap from the EPA.
Corn is for making whiskey, not fuel for cars. (and tortillas for the Julio’s)
Do away with the stupid EPA and associated regulations, and the problem is solved.


15 posted on 01/05/2012 7:45:02 AM PST by 9422WMR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 9422WMR

You are far more optimistic than I am!

I would love to do away with the EPA, but I don’t see it happening anytime soon.


16 posted on 01/05/2012 8:04:21 AM PST by Iowa Granny (Clintion ruined a dress, but Obama ruined a Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Click the Pic

It’s going to be a beautiful day to support Free Republic

Donating monthly
Will End Freepathons!

17 posted on 01/05/2012 8:07:19 AM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty
Let's get a good leader with the right values elected, then educate him if necessary.

One of the "right values" is that taxpayer money not be spent on private energy markets to suit a politician's whims. Anyone who requires educating on that principle will not be my preferred choice for president.

18 posted on 01/05/2012 9:24:02 AM PST by BfloGuy (The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

‘One of the “right values” is that taxpayer money not be spent on private energy markets to suit a politician’s whims. Anyone who requires educating on that principle will not be my preferred choice for president.’

Where is spending taxpayer money acceptable to you? Gardasil?

The system requires a lot of reform. We’re not going to get that with 0 in office. Santorum is offering $5 trillion in cuts over five years. That seems a good starting point.


19 posted on 01/05/2012 9:27:45 AM PST by PreciousLiberty (Real Hope - Santorum '12!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

Well what ever it was Perry is the only candidate that the Ethanol lobby campaigned against. They passed out a flyer at caucus places naming only Perry.


20 posted on 01/05/2012 9:53:21 AM PST by pgkdan ("Make what Americans buy, Buy what Americans make, and sell it to the world" Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
Would explain why he was the conservative in third place in Iowa.

I'm glad he didn't quit.

21 posted on 01/05/2012 10:00:55 AM PST by Tribune7 (Vote Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
Would explain why he was the conservative in third place in Iowa.

I'm glad he didn't quit.

22 posted on 01/05/2012 10:01:15 AM PST by Tribune7 (Vote Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny

Prior to the EPA mandating MTBE, it was up to the refiner what, if anything was necessary to add to produce a given octane level. MTBE’s were a bad answer to an environmentalist wacko fabricated question, which is typical for what we get from government. Personally, I’d like to see the EPA shut down, and it’s employees sent to forced labor in cornfields for their sins.


23 posted on 01/05/2012 1:49:37 PM PST by zeugma (Those of us who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson