Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

KFC Finger Lickiní Halal Food
EDL ^ | 1-4-12 | EDL

Posted on 01/05/2012 1:59:16 PM PST by bayouranger

The EDL have spent the last couple of years trying to raise the awareness of the creeping Islamisation of Britain through Islamic. One of the principal vehicles for Islamisation is the pushing of halal foods onto an unsuspecting and unknowing British populace. A furore arose when it was revealed that much meat was being passed to the general public without their knowledge or consent. In the wake of these revelations, many supermarkets began to label meat as halal or non-halal.

Many chain restaurants are also passing off halal meat to the general public without really advertising the fact. Nando’s, for example, serve only halal chicken in their restaurants. For a couple of years Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) has been trial-marketing halal foods in selected outlets. They claim on their website that this has been due to a huge demand for halal food.

Given that only halal foods can be served at these outlets, we are seeing Islamic shariah laws being imposed on the British public without their consent, without consulting them, and without their being informed. To identify the KFC outlets that are involved in the trial is difficult. One has to discover a small insignificant label. If one is not aware that the shop is selling or trialling the sale of halal meat to the public, one would be hard-pressed to find out, without asking directly.

KFC’s behaviour raises a number of very important issues which are hard to ignore once you understand the full significance of what is being done. KFC claim the following:

‘For some time, we have received requests to provide halal food in parts of the UK and as a result of this, we are running a halal trial within communities where we anticipate a strong demand for halal products.’

One of those communities is mine – in Hounslow West. This area does indeed have a Muslim community, but it is relatively small compared to the Sikh and Hindu communities, not to mention the Christian population in the same area. This is also the case in many of these so-called ‘areas of high demand’ for halal products. The issues for other religious communities are:

1. Sikhs cannot eat halal meat.

2. Christians cannot eat meat dedicated to a pagan god (Allah is not Jehovah).

3. Observant Jews must eat kosher, and not halal.

4. Non-religious people who hold animal welfare important do not want to eat the meat of animals that have been slaughtered cruelly.

Despite the claim that KFC consider animal welfare important, the assertion that all the chickens are stunned before slaughter is simple misdirection. The type of stunning used is minimal, and does not leave the animal fully unconscious. The animal is still sentient and able to feel the pain of its impending death.

No Muslim scholar would accept meat as being halal if the animal were fully unconscious at the moment of death. So KFC’s claim to hold animal welfare in high regard is pure nonsense.

It is also important point to note is that there is no choice given to non-Muslims about what food will be provided them at these restaurants. If you are a non-Muslim, you can have halal meat and only halal meat. This is because halal meat cannot be prepared in the same food-preparation area as non-halal foods stuffs. KFC are not willing to provide more than one food preparation area in any given restaurant, so we must eat halal foods, and only halal foods.

In these trial outlets there is no choice for the non-Muslim to have, say, bacon in his food, as can be found in other KFC outlets that are not being trial-marketing halal foods. The population of Muslims is generally much smaller than the non-Muslim population, so we have to ask: Why are we being pushed to have halal-only restaurants when we, the majority, are not Muslim?

In my own community in Hounslow West, there are several KFC style chicken food outlets that are halal-only and are obviously aimed only at Muslims. So why does corporate KFC want to try to capture a relatively minor market share, at the expense of annoying the majority by pushing halal foods on it.

Our masters in parliament do not want halal meat served in the restaurants in the palace of Westminster, so why should we? No one is saying Muslims cannot have halal foods, but they are well-provided by restaurants that cater to them, and sell foodstuffs that are almost identical.

It is time we stood up and boycotted all KFC restaurants until this madness is stopped. Kentucky Fried Chicken owners must be made to realise that we live in a country that is not Muslim-dominated, that in fact it is largely non-Muslim, and that these people do not want halal foods.

If you want to learn whether your local KFC is involved in this trial, please take a look at this link. Further information about our halal campaign can also be found here.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: england; filthykoranimals; halal; kfc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Although the article doesn't include how halal food also supports terrorism, it is spot on in drawing attention to the filthy ways koranimals do business.


1 posted on 01/05/2012 1:59:26 PM PST by bayouranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bayouranger

Oh yeah...don’t order bacon at any halal only KFC.

Not..I repeat..NOT safe for work.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AjnrbVxcRXw&feature=related

Filthy koranimals.


2 posted on 01/05/2012 2:01:51 PM PST by bayouranger (The 1st victim of islam is the person who practices the lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayouranger

Ummm, if you eat halal food, likkin’ you fingers might not be the best idea. Just sayin’.


3 posted on 01/05/2012 2:03:20 PM PST by mkmensinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayouranger

A dead chicken is a dead chicken, unless halal means other things.


4 posted on 01/05/2012 2:08:15 PM PST by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayouranger
2. Christians cannot eat meat dedicated to a pagan god (Allah is not Jehovah).

Pretty darn sure Paul destroyed that idea in his epistles. In fact, I am positive he did so.

5 posted on 01/05/2012 2:09:46 PM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayouranger

Muslim followers cannot consume the following:

pork or pork by products
animals that were dead prior to slaughtering
animals not slaughtered properly or not slaughtered in the name of Allah
blood and blood by products
alcohol
carnivorous animals
birds of prey
land animals without external ears

The prescribed method of slaughtering all animals excluding fish and most sea-life per Islamic law. This method of slaughtering animals consists of using a well sharpened knife to make a swift, deep incision that cuts the front of the throat, the carotid artery, wind pipe and jugular veins but leaves the spinal cord intact.

The head of an animal that is slaughtered using halal methods is aligned with the Qiblah (Mecca). In addition to the direction, permitted animal should be slaughtered in the name of Allah (the Lord) and the person who is slaughtering should be a Muslim and he/she should be in a good mental condition and faith.


6 posted on 01/05/2012 2:10:03 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayouranger

Fully conscious...fully unconscious? All tastes the same. Heck, when I killed our Thanksgiving turkey which I raised myself (53 lbs dressed out) it was like wrestling an 8 year old.

Except I got to cut his throat in the end.

;o)


7 posted on 01/05/2012 2:10:14 PM PST by Grunthor (Do you worship the State or do you worship the Lord? There is no middle ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

I won’t eat it because I won’t support Islam.


8 posted on 01/05/2012 2:11:58 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bayouranger
I wonder if KFC is doing the same thing here in the U.S.A.

Etiam non princeps sed usque ad genua, Principis Pacis!
9 posted on 01/05/2012 2:12:37 PM PST by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines RVN 1969 - St. Michael the Archangel defend us in Battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Let me know when you find a practising Muslims in ‘good mental condition,’ it’s definitionally impossible.


10 posted on 01/05/2012 2:12:52 PM PST by americanophile ("this absurd theology of an immoral Bedouin, is a rotting corpse which poisons our lives" - Ataturk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Fine, then don’t. But it isn’t a strike against a Christian’s faith if he doesn’t care where the meat came from.


11 posted on 01/05/2012 2:12:59 PM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bayouranger
Dhabiha: method of slaughterMain article: Dhabihah Ḏabīḥah (ذَبِيْحَة) is the prescribed method of slaughtering all animals excluding fish and most sea-life per Islamic law. This method of slaughtering animals consists of using a well sharpened knife to make a swift, deep incision that cuts the front of the throat, the carotid artery, wind pipe and jugular veins but leaves the spinal cord intact.[2] The head of an animal that is slaughtered using halal methods is aligned with the Qiblah. In addition to the direction, permitted animal should be slaughtered in the name of Allah (the Lord) and the person who is slaughtering should be a Muslim and he/she should be in a good mental condition and faith.

Thus, ensuring that Muslims are a necessary part of the meat production industry. Why, what could possibly go wrong?

12 posted on 01/05/2012 2:14:50 PM PST by Hodar ( Who needs laws; when this FEELS so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConorMacNessa
I wonder if KFC is doing the same thing here in the U.S.A.

I'd assume it is - and let KFC corporate worry about unfortunate rumors, lost sales, forced restaurant closings, bankruptcy, etc.

BTW, Church's Fried Chicken is owned by an Islamic investment bank that has full control over the menu. There are obviously "halal" sources of chicken meat in North America.

13 posted on 01/05/2012 2:21:07 PM PST by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bayouranger
Pretty much all food[Obviously, not Pork, etc] served in SE Asia[Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia] is all halal. McDonald's, KFC, Pizza Hut, ie is all like this.
14 posted on 01/05/2012 2:21:44 PM PST by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayouranger

Awaiting post by idiot whining about how “evil” the EDL is in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.....

Oh yeah, especially since anyone who is Sikh cannot eat at certain KFCs anymore.

Yeah the EDL is anti-Sikh and anti-Hindu too... /sarc


15 posted on 01/05/2012 2:21:44 PM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

[ BTW, Church’s Fried Chicken is owned by an Islamic investment bank that has full control over the menu. There are obviously “halal” sources of chicken meat in North America. ]

Just eat at a KFC that is built into a pizza hut as the pizza has pork sausage in it.


16 posted on 01/05/2012 2:24:41 PM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mkmensinger
>>>Ummm, if you eat halal food, likkin’ you fingers might not be the best idea Narrated Ibn 'Abbas: The Prophet said, 'When you eat, do not wipe your hands till you have licked it, or had it licked by somebody else." Sahih Bukhari 7:65:366
17 posted on 01/05/2012 2:33:04 PM PST by SIRTRIS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bayouranger

I didn’t know that bit about “Christians cannot eat meat dedicated to a pagan god.” I went to Catholic school, but they never covered that. (Of course, first it was “You can’t eat meat on Fridays,” but that changed too, after Vatican II.)


18 posted on 01/05/2012 2:35:27 PM PST by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayouranger
Christians CAN eat meat sacrificed to a pagan god. See 1st Corinthians.
19 posted on 01/05/2012 2:53:31 PM PST by GAB-1955 (I write books, serve my country, love my wife and daughter, and believe in the Resurrection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayouranger
Since when is the English Defence League a reliable source of news?
20 posted on 01/05/2012 2:54:48 PM PST by GAB-1955 (I write books, serve my country, love my wife and daughter, and believe in the Resurrection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson