Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum just hit it out of the park on Hannity (IMO)
1-6-12 | self

Posted on 01/06/2012 6:36:47 PM PST by Anti-Hillary

Love what he said when asked about earmarks. Said that as a senator of course you try to get money to go back to your state. The reason McCain became so hawkish on earmarks was because his record on the real problem, entitlements, was a disaster so he started harping on earmarks. HA!!!!!


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: santorum; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

1 posted on 01/06/2012 6:36:52 PM PST by Anti-Hillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

Sweet! Someone needs to post a link.


2 posted on 01/06/2012 6:37:55 PM PST by Antoninus (Defeat Romney--Defeat Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

To be fair, I don’t know what Congressman or Senator has a good record on entitlements, with Paul Ryan being a notable exception. Admittedly I don’t know much about Santorum’s record on this, but what did he do to reform entitlements while Senator? Did he help push the Bush Social Security reform plan in 2005 when most Republican Congresscritters and Senators just ran for cover? If he did, good for him. If not, then what grounds does he have for critiquing anyone else’s record on that?


3 posted on 01/06/2012 6:42:45 PM PST by MissesBush (Raising taxes on an economy in a death spiral is like taking up smoking when you have emphysema e x)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

Pretty lame explanation for both.


4 posted on 01/06/2012 6:44:55 PM PST by Reagan69 (I supported Sarah Palin and all I got was a lousy DVD !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Shhhhhh, Santorum won Iowa. Keep it a secret.
He should be climbing all over national news. No, not him. Wuss.

Doesn't want to make waves.

None of these politicians these days have a set.

Of course the story has gone away already. There was a 20 vote descrepancy. He won by 12, not lost by 8.

5 posted on 01/06/2012 6:46:40 PM PST by AGreatPer (Obama has NEVER given a speech where he did not lie!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer
Doesn't want to make waves. None of these politicians these days have a set.

Well he has come out for cuts in Soc Sec NOW

What other politician has the gonads to do that ?
6 posted on 01/06/2012 6:50:02 PM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

That’s why as much funding as possible should be local. If Vermont wants a maple syrup museum, Vermont should fund it, not send its senators to grub from the trough. The system as it’s set up just encourages profligate spending on local projects as all of us try frantically to get our fair share back. If we funded everything out of state and local budgets we’d be much more thoughtful.


7 posted on 01/06/2012 6:54:50 PM PST by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush
Did he help push the Bush Social Security reform plan in 2005 when most Republican Congresscritters and Senators just ran for cover? If he did, good for him. If not, then what grounds does he have for critiquing anyone else’s record on that?

2005 was a different world. This is what I call picking flyspecks out of pepper. Wake up. There are a few more pressing issues in 2012 than some ill-advised Bush fiasco seven years ago.

8 posted on 01/06/2012 6:56:23 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

Not sure it’s a matter of Gonads. More it’s a matter of timing. Now aint the time.


9 posted on 01/06/2012 6:57:03 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

voting for raising the debt limit multiple times is a problem. He is not conservative


10 posted on 01/06/2012 6:57:26 PM PST by Leader_Of_The _Conservatives (High time to bring back the true sons of liberty!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer

Yeah he should man up like the Al Gore and the Democrats. File a lawsuit, demand recount after recount after recount, whine incessantly about how the election was stolen, throw a red flag and demand a review.

I find it refreshing. Move on to the next battle. The Iowa total was inconsequential as no matter the total he came out the winner. Now focus on New Hampshire get a 2nd place finish, fill your war chest and kick ass in the Palmetto state.


11 posted on 01/06/2012 6:59:38 PM PST by bleach (If I agreed with you, we would both be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

Yes, he did. My wife was watching and I went to watch (I rarely watch FOX anymore after Beck left, but I like Rick). Hannity’s “interview” was a million times better than O’Reilly’s “interview” the other night. Given the magnitude of what had just transpired in Iowa, I can say O’Reilly’s “interview” was THE WORST INTERVIEW I have ever seen in the history of politics.


12 posted on 01/06/2012 7:02:02 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bleach
I agree with your point 100%.

However, if it was a democrat can you believe how they would be crying.

I like Santorum. Not sure he can meke it. But the best VP canidate there is.

13 posted on 01/06/2012 7:09:47 PM PST by AGreatPer (Obama has NEVER given a speech where he did not lie!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

It appears it will now be a level playing field in SC.
Rick will have the money to compete.


14 posted on 01/06/2012 7:11:39 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives

If the goal is to stop Willard, then who the hell is conservative? We’re left with the two Rick’s and Newt.

Unless Sarah jumps in, right now this “Rick” is the firewall. Mitt breaks out of SC with three wins and it’s a short primary season and a long campaign one for the conservative side.
This Ivory soap 99 and 99/100th percent pure insanity is going to surely lead us to defeat and I’m not finished with my SHTF prep.


15 posted on 01/06/2012 7:14:36 PM PST by bleach (If I agreed with you, we would both be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Rick Santorum? What a statist nobody frat-boy type. The last time he ran in a purple state he lost by 18%. An empty suit version of Romney (who I will hold my nose when I vote for him in December).

Easily the worst repub in this field. Less charismatic than even Bachmann.


16 posted on 01/06/2012 7:18:38 PM PST by bucephalus (Sarah loves me, not you - back off, ingrates!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bucephalus

To each his own.


17 posted on 01/06/2012 7:25:47 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer

You have a point. He has never been in my top choices but may be our last. I don’t see Perry regaining ground and I’m not a fan of his version of the Dream Act. Newt has flamed out. I don’t like the scorched earth napalming of the field, unless he knows he has no chance and is trying to open the door for a fresh face.


18 posted on 01/06/2012 7:26:48 PM PST by bleach (If I agreed with you, we would both be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bleach

That type of approach got us the baby socialist Bush when Alan Keyes was the better candidate in 2000....I want someone with a proven track record of conservative voting and a liberty minded agenda. When we have freedom and liberty...the rest will fall in place


19 posted on 01/06/2012 7:29:24 PM PST by Leader_Of_The _Conservatives (High time to bring back the true sons of liberty!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives

Where are they? I don’t see them on the ballot. You get them on the 2012 ballot, this pivotal election and we’ll see then. For now this is our choice.

Allen Keyes? Allen West maybe..


20 posted on 01/06/2012 7:35:15 PM PST by bleach (If I agreed with you, we would both be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

Watch out!

Santorium is a HIGE “social justice” devotee.

Look at his record, PERSONALLY and what he voted for.

Look at the sweetheart deal he got on his house and how he had to pay back the state of Pennsylvania oodles for internet service for his kids living in VIRGINIA to be SCHOOLED by a PENNSYLVNAI school district. This guy is ENTLTILMENT minded as a silly Senator, SNAEKY and GREEDY. Self gain is the name of his game.


21 posted on 01/06/2012 7:39:32 PM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

I think Rick hit into a double play with his remarks about reforming SS right now. The Dems are going to have field day with this one.


22 posted on 01/06/2012 7:43:30 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bleach

There is one person with a true liberty minded agenda and that is Dr. Paul. Conservatives seem now to be more worried about the next 3rd world country we need to invade that poses no threat per the Mossad and the CIA....there are conservatives here that hate the Patriot Act and the NDAA. But will support and vote for the same republicans that will keep it in place...the GOP sadly has become the police state fear party...melting in to that demoncrat mindset


23 posted on 01/06/2012 7:44:44 PM PST by Leader_Of_The _Conservatives (High time to bring back the true sons of liberty!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Someone posted this indicating Santorum excuses his record on earmarks by saying someone else was bad on entitlements. My point was, if Santorum didn’t help in 2005 when Bush attempted to reform SS, the biggest entitlement, then why is he criticizing someone else’s record on entitlements? Maybe that’s all ancient history, but a candidate’s record is contained in history. And if he didn’t help reform entitlements in 2005, how are we suppose to believe he’ll be a force for reform should he become our nominee and later possibly president?


24 posted on 01/06/2012 7:46:57 PM PST by MissesBush (Raising taxes on an economy in a death spiral is like taking up smoking when you have emphysema e x)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nmh

Your spelling and grammatical errors totally undermine any credibility as a critical thinker, so stick to Ron Paul sites where you’ll be among more like-minded souls.


25 posted on 01/06/2012 7:47:47 PM PST by caper gal 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives

You are living in a Neville Chamberlin-inspired fantasy land. If I were still an idealistic 20-something, I, too, would want to believe Dr. Paul’s Rx of isolationism would make all the bad guys leave us alone. But facts are stubborn things and we have to deal with the far more frightening reality of enemies bent on our destruction and confront them realistically.


26 posted on 01/06/2012 7:56:29 PM PST by caper gal 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Stop with the dimwit ron paul lies.
27 posted on 01/06/2012 8:04:43 PM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Newt, Willard, Perry and nervous supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: caper gal 1

Do you know how old I am? Dont be so quick to judge me because I dont fear a backwards third world country. I dont feel we should have a police state because of that either....this drum has been beat too many times...starting with Iraq....we aint leaving there in victory are we?


28 posted on 01/06/2012 8:09:15 PM PST by Leader_Of_The _Conservatives (High time to bring back the true sons of liberty!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: caper gal 1
You are living in a Neville Chamberlin-inspired fantasy land. If I were still an idealistic 20-something, I, too, would want to believe Dr. Paul’s Rx of isolationism would make all the bad guys leave us alone.

Dr. Paul is old enough to know better.

So are most FReepers...but not all.

29 posted on 01/06/2012 8:12:55 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush
good for him
30 posted on 01/06/2012 8:39:54 PM PST by JohnBovenmyer (Obama been Liberal. Hope Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: heartwood

AMEN.


31 posted on 01/06/2012 8:40:10 PM PST by fightinJAG (So many seem to have lost their sense of smell . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bucephalus

‘who I will hold my nose when I vote for him in December’

I’m glad you are voting in December.


32 posted on 01/06/2012 8:53:02 PM PST by AlmaKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives

No, thanks to Obama putting an election promise to end the war even if it meant losing eveything we had fought for before the lives of those given to help free Iraq is unforgivable. Obama’s politically motivated pre-mature withdrawal leaves a lot of American blood on his hands.


33 posted on 01/06/2012 9:18:23 PM PST by caper gal 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bucephalus

You don’t mean December - you mean when you vote on the first Wednesday in November.


34 posted on 01/06/2012 9:25:05 PM PST by caper gal 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AlmaKing

As long as you vote!

I dont care if you cant bring yourself to pull the lever for Romnay- but at least make sure you go, and get everyone else you know to go, to vote down the line for the REST OF THE REPUBLICAN TICKETS for senators and congresscritters!!!!!!!!!!

I was hinking the other day that it might be fun and a kick in the teeth to the establisment GOP to have a veto-proof republican congress WHILE Obambi is in office

wait wait wait.... hear me out

If Romney was in with a GOP congress, he can continue the status quo and the GOP’s will go along with him just because...

But if the GOP were to govern the country by congress, overturn obamacare, and gut the government there would be nohing Obama could do about it

He could go on vacation to hawaii and stay there

I read an article the other day that he barely goes to the oval office anymore- he sits around in shorts and t-shirt in a TV room upstairs watching ESPN all day while his minions bring people around to see him for 15 mintes max.


35 posted on 01/06/2012 9:28:25 PM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: nmh

Was Santorum paying taxes in the district from which he benefitted? If so, what’s the deal?


36 posted on 01/06/2012 9:35:12 PM PST by alstewartfan (27 of 36 of Romney's judicial appointments were DEMOCRATS!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
2005 was a different world.

Yeah, we were a lot less broke then. The Tea Party wasn't born yet. W was elected, before 2005, saying he was going to start privatizing SS. It is no longer a hopeless subject, merely a difficult one. I give Santorum credit for being consistent and forthright... and right with his stand on SS. As the sure to fail date for SS, when doing nothing, gets closer the politics will change. Ask the Paulbots how many of them expect to collect anything from SS. Many older voters despise Obama and understand the need to reform SS. They aren't all FDR's brain washed minions any more.

37 posted on 01/06/2012 9:52:52 PM PST by JohnBovenmyer (Obama been Liberal. Hope Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

Santorum is a joke. He will not get the nomination.
He needs to take his Mr. Rogers sweater vests and go home to be a father to his seven children.

And no Rick, blah does not sound anything like the word “black”.Nice try.

I love Hannity’s facial expression when he’s interviewing someone he doesn’t take seriously or care for. It’s a kind of bemused half smile. And the poor guy has to try to keep a straight face with Levin’s jokes popping up on his computer 24/7.


38 posted on 01/06/2012 10:24:24 PM PST by Mountain Mary (Awaken Oh America...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary
Those people who think that Rick Santorum is a big-government conservative should have a look at this thread.
39 posted on 01/06/2012 10:57:12 PM PST by danielmryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
Not sure it’s a matter of Gonads. More it’s a matter of timing. Now aint the time.

So just exactly when will "the time" be?

40 posted on 01/06/2012 10:58:59 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan

Did anybody mention the following fact?

OBAMA”CARE” IS A MONOPOLY, AND THEREFORE VIOLATES THE ANTI-TRUST LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.


41 posted on 01/06/2012 11:03:51 PM PST by Graewoulf (( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

IF “ - - - a senator of course you try to get money to go back to your state.”

THEN how does that differ from embezzlement?


42 posted on 01/06/2012 11:07:59 PM PST by Graewoulf (( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan

I believe you meant to link this post: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2829572/posts


43 posted on 01/07/2012 1:01:51 AM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush

He cosponsored Social Security Reform


44 posted on 01/07/2012 3:03:05 AM PST by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

some time after his election.

Going after Social Security now is like shooting himself in the foot.

We all know it has to be corrected, but why shoot your chances down right at the peak of your popularity?


45 posted on 01/07/2012 5:02:29 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: caper gal 1

Iraq forced our hand...as a sovereign nation, starting this year they would start putting our troops on trial if they did something wrong. With that we were forced to leave in defeat. A meaningless invasion to go aftet a dictator we propped up 30 years ago


46 posted on 01/07/2012 5:14:08 AM PST by Leader_Of_The _Conservatives (High time to bring back the true sons of liberty!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: PGalt; All

Well, I’m no O’Reilly fan anymore. So many at FOX are in the tank for Romney and Ann Coulter has become a traitor to the Conservative cause. First wanting Christie to run and now endorsing Romney. THAT SAID.............. I thought it was good for O’Reilly to give Rick a “heads-up” on what the media and his opponents were going to hit him with. To be fore warned is to be fore-armed.


47 posted on 01/07/2012 7:56:00 AM PST by no dems (I'm more concerned with America's future than I am Newt's past.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives; All

voting for raising the debt limit multiple times is a problem. He is not conservative
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
YEAH; you tell ‘em Leader_Of_The_Conservatives: Hell yeah!!! Let’s us Conservatives destroy every candidate we have before the General Election and send him into the GE such “damaged goods” that Obozo will win easily and we’ll have him and his Marxist Administration for another four years so they can finish destroying this nation. WAY TO GO BRO..... The Obama Administration and the Socialists of the world thank you.

(You fumb duck!)


48 posted on 01/07/2012 8:05:27 AM PST by no dems (I'm more concerned with America's future than I am Newt's past.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: caper gal 1
Maybe we should have listen to Paul 10 years ago when he said this
49 posted on 01/07/2012 8:16:46 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: no dems; mickie
"I thought it was good for O'Reilly to give Rick a 'head's up' on what the media was going to hit him with....."

....as though Rick wasn't aware of this fact himself. Rick knew, the whole political world knew that Rick's head was next on the chopping block.

O'Bloviator was just stating the obvious....and the funny part of it is that he's still taking credit for the fulfillment of his redundant "warning".

Leni

50 posted on 01/07/2012 8:22:51 AM PST by MinuteGal (A Happy New Year is OBAMAGEDDON in 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson