Todd? Who cares? ; )
I want SARAHCUUUUUUUDA’s enthusiastic endorsement and vote. Btw, Sarah actually VOTED for Huck in her primary before accepting McLame’s number two in 2008..
But McLame (33%) hijacked our nomination from Huck (30%) & Thompson (15%) - the prohibitive favs among conservatives in SC, the decider state.
And now Willard (30%) is scheming to do the same versus Newt (A STRONG 23% WHO NEEDS HELP..C’MON SARAH!), Santorum (19%), and Perry (5%) - the evangelical three favs by far and away combined over Willard.
Sarah should endorse the strongest Evangelical/Christian/Conservative candidate just as she VOTED for our strongest one in 2008...
IN 2012: That’s Newt!!!
Sarah should endorse the strongest Evangelical/Christian/Conservative candidate just as she VOTED for our strongest one in 2008...
IN 2012: That’s Newt!!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Delusional Newbie Alert.
Huckabee would have been annihilated even worse than McCain was.
Newt is not an Evangelical Christian; he is a Convenience Catholic.
“...the prohibitive favs among conservatives in SC, the decider state.”
Have you ever thought how ridiculous it is, with 47 of 50 states not having had even one crossover voter, much less having a republican primary voter, cast even one single primary ballot, and no County Convention having voted on one State Convention Delegate, much less any State Covention deciding on who their delegates to the National Convention will be, we the people - the grassroots if you will - are accepting that South Carolina is the “decider state” and it is about to be “decided” for us who our presidential nominee is going to be?