Maybe because the plaintifs were representing themselves and there was nothing to actually appeal?
posted on 01/10/2012 11:17:37 AM PST
(Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
Why would you think there was nothing to appeal? Please elaborate.
I didn’t follow this at all so wasn’t even familiar with the case. Hence my lack of knowledge.
posted on 01/10/2012 5:00:49 PM PST
(I'm lucky enough to live, walk & breathe among heroes! I am the mother of a US Marine!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson